User talk:Prophecy

• Main talk page
• Archive 1 from 2008-04-12 to 2008-08-05
• Archive 2 from 2008-08-05 to 2008-12-07

Fishnets

I've been noticing the uploading of fishnet clothing pictures. Some pin up article have pictures of them in fishnets. Lorraine Burnett and Marge Mellor, come to mind.Apara 23:10, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Oh ok, well if you needed more, then you know where to look....Apara 23:27, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Movie Pages

For a few of the articles, I want to mention that the performer performed in the infamous pardory Who's Naylin' Paylin?. How do you make those pages? Cost 18:37, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Yes. I forgot to add that... Cost 18:42, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Booble Girls

A request has been made for a DanniGirls-type template for :Category:Booble Cover Girls, if you're interested (and don't have any other projects you're working on :) ) The Honorable 22:09, 15 December 2008 (EST)

Supporting Actresses and Sequels

What do we do with supporting actresses? Should we include them in the template or just the article? The two films that have this are Pirates and Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge.

The latter is also the sequel to the former. Should I put it type=episode in the template for them?

Cost 13:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Yeah, that's what I was planning on doing too. Cost 02:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)

Since you started the article

You probably have something to say, Talk:Madonna. Apara 03:07, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Micro Tits Ciccone

Sure, but she has not looked like the black and white photo for almost 25 years, the new photo is what she looks like. Madonna is NOT a C and barely ever was, in her early days she was virtually flat chested. I have sent pics to an editor to show you what I mean. Cone bras does not a bust make. My text is very relevant to boobpedia so I'm disappointed that is deleted. The article reads like a madonna fan cut and paste-this is a site about big boobs not over hyped ones. Also anyone who would use Lynsey in the same sentence madonna does not know their boobs. madonna needs to be compared to smaller women. Just an opinion. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Why was the picture deleted? That is WHAT SHE LOOKS LIKE. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, it's breastking, I responded to you on the madonna page. i wrote most of Russ Meyer's wikipedia page btw. Madonna is the Anti-Super Vixen in every way shape and especially form! Best WishesBreastKing 07:20, 5 January 2009 (EST)

I responded again on the Mandonna page.Regarding my great article on Russ Meyer from wikipedia, you are extremely incorrect and lying as there are tons of notations and citations on my wikipedia article, THAT I PUT IN, that's why I was awarded my Barn Star for it as it was only two paragraphs when I got there.Perhaps you are not clear as to what my wikipedia name is? I also wrote most of the other Russ Meyer related pages correcting mistakes.

Happy New Year

Happy New Year to you too, Prophecy! I don't know if you've noticed, but we received some big news for Fuko on the new year-- She's going all-out AV. (Personally, I'd prefer just nude-posing, but I'll take AV without complaint if it comes to that ;) About other editors, yes, I see what you mean... I haven't followed what this is all about, but there was a certain editor at WP involved in the Russ Meyer page who was also changing Fuko's measurements at random, calling them "real" measurements, but based on pure guess-work... I hope this sort of bat-shittery isn't coming over here... One of WP's bad habits is carrying assumptions of good faith beyond the breaking point for disruptive users, while being unnecessarily harsh on good contributors. I trust BP's administrators will not fall into that trap though :) Looking forward to another year of good work with you. Cheers! Dekkappai 09:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)

I fear it's getting even worse than pixels. You notice the stars over her nipples on the video cover, I assume? There's a new wave of censorship sweeping Japan. I hope that doesn't mean AV DVD covers are going to start looking like that!  :-( Dekkappai 22:15, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, Prophecy-- I have a question on this edit at Harumi Nemoto. Did you mean to re-locate the References section up from the bottom? If so, why? I thought we'd agreed References at bottom was to be a BP-standard. Dekkappai 22:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)

I notice you removed the Ja-wiki link in the lead with that edit also. I've been including that as a standard format in the Japanese model articles... Dekkappai 22:51, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Oops. It was Apara. Dekkappai 23:12, 6 January 2009 (EST)

A weighty issue

Hi, Prophecy. I've got an interesting problem here... I've just discovered that two of "my" models are the same person... She used the name Pine Miyazaki when she was a plump-ish big-bust model for Cinema Unit GAS, then she put on some weight and became a full BBW model under the name Yui Kyomoto... So her two infoboxes are the same in many points, but very different in other points-- waist and hip measurements particularly. What to do? I'm going to go ahead and put two separate infoboxes in the merged article, but that looks clunky, and makes the "Alias" field redundant... Any better suggestions? (Incidentally, I find she made quite a few videos under a third name-- whether that involves any significant body changes, I don't know yet.) Dekkappai 00:04, 13 January 2009 (EST)

I've merged the two into her first stage name-- Momoko Okada-- and, again, their are significant physical differences, though she is the same model. Apparently she's been gaining weight throughout her career, beginning in 2004. The gain is reflected in the cup-size also-- from G (Japanese) to J. (And a very pretty girl, thin or fat, in my book :-) Tell me if the article can be tidied up in any way-- looks awfully cluttered to me, with three infoboxes, but I don't know how else to get around this problem. Dekkappai 00:55, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, Prophecy... Well, I'd agree with you normally-- such as with your Lindsay example-- but in this case, the actress is almost making a different "character" for each name/weight change. The data within each name seems to be consistent, but once she has upped her weight, she changes name, character, and the info that goes with it... Yet she is still the same person, so I don't think separate articles on each one would be the answer either... How about making separate sections within the article for each "identity", with each one having its own biobox? Dekkappai 16:40, 13 January 2009 (EST)