Boobpedia:Suggestions
This page is for suggestions and comments about Boobpedia. To add a new section, click here. Suggestions for Boobpedia articles can be posted at Boobpedia:Requests. Requests for merging duplicate pages can be posted at Boobpedia:Duplicates. |
Booble Winners
How about having a template for it, just like the DanniGirls template? Cost 00:31, 15 December 2008 (EST)
- This has been given a priority of C. If anyone has free time or is bored or whatever, feel free to do so. Cost 18:33, 6 January 2009 (EST)
Category intersection search
How about a Long Hair Category? There are some guys who like long hair with their big boobs.
How about being able to search for women by a set of categories or tags? For example, go to a search page and have check boxes for each category. The user clicks the categories for the women they are interested in and a search reveals which women fit that criteria.
E.g. Checking boxes for Blonde, DD, and Fake would return Diamond Foxx, Shyla Stylez, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphaqup (talk • contribs) 03:39, 20 December 2008. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
- I've thought of this too-- say clicking Japanese, BBW & lactation brings up just the actresses/models who fit into all three categories. I don't think this kind of thing is possible though with the software. Someone with more technical expertise will have to answer. Dekkappai 00:00, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- I've always wanted this too. This would be a really neat feature. Cost 22:08, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- Wikipedia has been working on it forever -- see Wikipedia:Category intersection. The version of MediaWiki that Wikipedia is running sort of supports intersections, but it's clunky. The Honorable 13:03, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- Does it say that somewhere in the version page? What did they install that allows this? Why is it clunky? -Thefixer 09:49, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- I think it's built into newer versions of MediaWiki. Wikipedia is running 1.14alpha, which is too bleeding edge for other sites. And having to search for +incategory:"Category name 1" +incategory:"Category name 2" strikes me as clunky. *shrug* The Honorable 11:25, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- How often do we update the sie to new versions of WikiMedia? And what requirements do we need to meet to get the newer versions of MediaWiki? Cost 23:03, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- Good question. Also, you can probably just manually edit the search page and insert "incategory" input fields. -Thefixer 07:23, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- I've been using the category intersection in Wikipedia for the past month and although you have to write a bunch in the search box, I find that it works quite well. Would it be possible for us to get that version, or would that affect other areas of the website too much??? -Johnson9000 01:26, 16 October 2009 (EST)
- Good question. Also, you can probably just manually edit the search page and insert "incategory" input fields. -Thefixer 07:23, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- How often do we update the sie to new versions of WikiMedia? And what requirements do we need to meet to get the newer versions of MediaWiki? Cost 23:03, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- I think it's built into newer versions of MediaWiki. Wikipedia is running 1.14alpha, which is too bleeding edge for other sites. And having to search for +incategory:"Category name 1" +incategory:"Category name 2" strikes me as clunky. *shrug* The Honorable 11:25, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- Does it say that somewhere in the version page? What did they install that allows this? Why is it clunky? -Thefixer 09:49, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- Wikipedia has been working on it forever -- see Wikipedia:Category intersection. The version of MediaWiki that Wikipedia is running sort of supports intersections, but it's clunky. The Honorable 13:03, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- I've been going around this limitation by using Google and the texts that the categories show on the page. So, for instance to google for look-a-likes of my sister-in-law, I'd search for:
+site:boobpedia.com +Caucasian +"34E bra" +"Natural tits" +Average +Brunette
- --LikeMnatural 17:17, 12 January 2009 (EST)
- I've tried the above. I too think we should be able to cross reference to find specific girls. But when it comes to cup size, how about being able to search for a range. For example "From A to C" or "From DD to Biggest". This would be in addition to cross referencing girls by performance. My ideal search would be: "Anal", "Natural", "Boobs: From DD To Largest". Thank You.- Federov1455
- This is a most longed for feature. I don't know about MediaWiki nor do I want to, but it's based on PHP and I could hardcode a PHP page to do just that. I'd just need a copy of the website and a reduced copy of the database, like with just 5 different girls, of course with DB password changed but the DB structure should remain the same. After I'm done, the owner would just need to copy my page in the website tree, and change the password in the page accordingly. That's all. I'm pretty confident it shouldn't take too long to do and I'd try to respect themes and make it as versatile as possible. KR80 17:28, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
FreeOnes has this functionality as Advanced Search, accessible under the Babes banner button. It allows a good variety of items to search on, and allows modifications to the search after launch. For instance, if you searched for Asian Porn Stars with DD boobs living in France, after launch you could add Adult Models and Centerfolds, and select from various sorting criteria. buben8r 19:40, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
StumblePorn
http://stumbleporn.com/masters.php
This could help generate more traffic for our website.
According to Alexa, our global reach is down 33% while our page view is down only 5%. That means that even though less people are coming than before, the ones that are coming are viewing many pages and are staying longer on our site. Accordingly, we just need to bring people to our site, and they'll stay.Cost 22:17, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- We could also try incorporating Google Analytics to see where our visitors are going and derive ways in which we can increase new traffic and maintain current visitors. Speaking of which, do the administrators here feel that we need to increase traffic?Cost 22:42, 1 January 2009 (EST)
New categories of actions
How about adding new categories of hardcore actions like creampie, DPP, DAP, IR —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipper (talk • contribs) 16:08, 22 December 2008. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
- Yeah, that would be nice. Cost 21:29, 22 December 2008 (EST)
- I agree. Also possibly adding handjobs or titfucking as for some models(Crystal Gunns), that is as far as they will go --titman86 22:55, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
Another word for Boobs and Tits
This website should have a dictionary nor a encyclopedia about boobs and tits. Also make a list of words like hooters, jugs, knockers, bazookas, melons, gazoombas, whoppers, fun bags, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VL2345 (talk • contribs) 04:37, 28 December 2008. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
- Good idea-- with as much legitimate etymology as we can dig up, and words in languages other than English (especially slang, with English translations) Someone start it up, and I'll be happy to contribute some choice Japanese & Korean ;) Dekkappai 23:50, 27 December 2008 (EST)
- Yeah, there is probably a huge list on urban dictionary.Cost 12:06, 29 December 2008 (EST)
- I'll see what I can do. Apara 20:10, 30 December 2008 (EST)
- Alternate names for breasts, here you go. Apara 15:45, 31 December 2008 (EST)
- That's a start! However, each term generally has a more specified and deeper meaning. For example, to scream is a synonym of to say, but not vice-versa. How can we incorporate these definitions on that page? I was thinking of having each one under its own heading, but that might get too cluttered. Cost 22:46, 1 January 2009 (EST)
- I was looking up the origins for each words. But had no luck finding anything of now. Apara 02:16, 7 January 2009 (EST)
- That's a start! However, each term generally has a more specified and deeper meaning. For example, to scream is a synonym of to say, but not vice-versa. How can we incorporate these definitions on that page? I was thinking of having each one under its own heading, but that might get too cluttered. Cost 22:46, 1 January 2009 (EST)
- Alternate names for breasts, here you go. Apara 15:45, 31 December 2008 (EST)
- I'll see what I can do. Apara 20:10, 30 December 2008 (EST)
- Yeah, there is probably a huge list on urban dictionary.Cost 12:06, 29 December 2008 (EST)
Wikipedia
Where can we see a list of all the Wikiepdia copied articles hereCost 15:26, 29 December 2008 (EST)
- I don't know if there's a list (a category might be appropriate), but when I was going through the articles to remove "Wikipedia" notices from articles which had been deleted there, I put "GFDL" into the search box, and got a list of every article which had that notice. Dekkappai 15:42, 29 December 2008 (EST)
- Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:GFDL shows every article that links to the GFDL template, which should be all of the Wikipedia imports. The Honorable 20:07, 29 December 2008 (EST)
- Thanks. I was just fixing articles I imported from Wikipedia, and I thought it would be nice if I could go and fix other imported articles later on. I just did Sarah Blake, how is it? Cost 21:56, 29 December 2008 (EST)
Mammary intercourse
Anyone of you think putting it in the biobox or as a category saying that performer engages in it? Apara 02:16, 7 January 2009 (EST)
- Is that the old titty fuck? Cost 07:03, 7 January 2009 (EST)
- Not sure... I don't know what goes on in the U.S. and other porn industries, but for just about every one of the Japanese AV actresses, paizuri is a given... At least these days... On the other hand, it's one performance category I'd mark without feeling a need to source... Dekkappai 13:18, 7 January 2009 (EST)
- I say go for it. This is a performance that's the exclusive domain of big-breasted women. Someone with an A- or B-cup wouldn't really be able to engage in this. Speaking of sourcing, how can you source performances? For the ones that are listed on LA Direct or something similar, you can look up their profile, but for the vast majority, you'd have to source a picture or a clip. That would be much harder to do. This Wikipedia article has more info on it.Cost 16:42, 7 January 2009 (EST)
- Right, sourcing them is tricky, which is why I rarely mark them. I think sourcing them is important though-- I don't think we want to say "So & so gives BJs in public" if it's not verifiable. The way I've done is is to put a ref tag after marking "yes" in the BJ field. The ref tag gives a note saying "See: Back cover to the video, So & So Gives BJs to a Whole Buncha Guys! Part 13, where the back cover to that video clearly shows So & So engaged in the act. And we have the video cover uploaded, so it's easy to verify. Dekkappai 18:09, 7 January 2009 (EST)
- I say go for it. This is a performance that's the exclusive domain of big-breasted women. Someone with an A- or B-cup wouldn't really be able to engage in this. Speaking of sourcing, how can you source performances? For the ones that are listed on LA Direct or something similar, you can look up their profile, but for the vast majority, you'd have to source a picture or a clip. That would be much harder to do. This Wikipedia article has more info on it.Cost 16:42, 7 January 2009 (EST)
- Not sure... I don't know what goes on in the U.S. and other porn industries, but for just about every one of the Japanese AV actresses, paizuri is a given... At least these days... On the other hand, it's one performance category I'd mark without feeling a need to source... Dekkappai 13:18, 7 January 2009 (EST)
AVN and other Awards
How should we put them up? Should we just follow the method that's been used on most of the pages right now? Cost 20:16, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- I don't bother with them. If this wiki was more porn orientated, I would say go for it. Apara 20:30, 13 January 2009 (EST)
"Articles with new pictures" Section
Some of us agree that this section should be removed. Not only that isn't updated when a new picture is uploaded. It also promotes editors to upload a good amount of pictures, that isn't necessarily needed. Apara 13:51, 17 January 2009 (EST)
- I concur. In my opinion, the entire homepage should be revised and revamped. Cost 22:00, 18 January 2009 (EST)
Boobmedia
As we have in Wikipedia, we might have a "Boobmedia", acting like a catalogue of the uploaded photos. Cheers! Biff.
- Some of the pictures have been tagged with categories... Cost 15:42, 2 March 2009 (EST)
- You are talking about Wikimedia Commons, which is used as a common media repository for different Wikimedia projects. There is no need for such here, the categories are sufficient as Cost said above. --LikeMnatural 05:01, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
Naturals
In the naturals section can we also break it down to bust and cup size
- We could just use category intersection search for that. Cost 17:34, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
Updating Awards
Right now, the DanniGirls list/template is 5 months outdated. This is probably the case with other ones as well. As a grass-roots wiki organization, I think we should lets users take on roles/duties as they see fit. We should try to keep these lists updated. Right now, it feels like we've hit a plateau.
I've been maintaining the Big Naturals page right now. I want to do the DanniGirls one too, but I don't know how to make a template that will work the ones from past years. If you can give me a link that shows how, I'll be happy to do it.
Anyways, list what lists/etc you want to help maintain here. Cost 23:10, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
- Hi, Cost. I assume we're all watching & maintaining our own subject-areas. I've been watching the Japanese series that I've created, and have a user-page to check for updates here. Maybe we could have more "official" pages for maintaining updates? But, for these particular articles, I'm the only one maintaining them, so I wouldn't think it necessary. I don't look in much at other areas of BP... Dekkappai 18:05, 6 May 2009 (EDT)
Recommendations
If we visit a model's page, we could have a sort of 'if you liked model A, try models B and C'
- We do, but it's optional. Apara 04:44, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
- We could try making a standardized procedure for it...Cost 16:42, 15 May 2009 (EDT)
- Personally I wouldn't use it. I think some of us had a discussion about this before. Apara 19:27, 15 May 2009 (EDT)
- I'm not in favor of this option either-- too subjective. Nearly always when I look at these "You may also like, similar body" that other editors have added, they seem to me to have nothing in common... Dekkappai 02:42, 17 May 2009 (EDT)
- We could try making a standardized procedure for it...Cost 16:42, 15 May 2009 (EDT)
Maritial status indication
How about a maritial status indicator in the biobox? It could say things like 'Married' 'Single' 'Divorced' etc.
- I guess we could add that to the biobox. However, just remember that most pro porn stars don't really state this in their bios/interviews.Cost 16:41, 15 May 2009 (EDT)
The Internet
Note lines in YOUR writing - and I mean writing that is not necessarily in the individual articles, but rather in the Boobpedia writing.
"Super Amanda is an Italian-American singer, writer, and internet personality".
The word "Internet" is a proper noun, and all proper nouns in English are always capitalized, and not to capitalize "Internet" is a deep, deep insult to all of the electrical engineers and computer scientists who have labored long and hard for years to make the Internet the marvel that it is. It's insulting!
I have seen the same problem with people who are too dimwitted to capitalize TV, BBC, FAA, RAF, RCA, SST, USAF, and so forth.
Another bad one that has cropped up along with the Internet is the group of foreigners whose brains are too sluggish to capitalize the words like the following, thus insulting billions of people: Australian, Brazilian, Canadian, Chinese, Danish, English, French, German, Hungarian, Indian, Japanese, Korean, Lithuanian, Mexican, Nigerian, Omani, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish, Turkish, Ugandan, Vietnamese, Yiddish, and Zambian. It is easy to remember: these are Always Capitalized in English, whether they are in your native tongue or not.
D.A.W. 00:55, 30 July 2009 (EDT)
New Body Type Category
I think the body type categories are incomplete. While Slim, Muscular, Athletic, Chubby and BBW are just fine, I have a big problem with the term Average. I think a lot of curvaceous ladies who are not slim but not chubby (eg. Claire Dames, Kim Kardashian) have no choice but to be described as "average". I'm not saying that you should do away with the term "average" but to instead create a category for ladies who have nice curves and a big ass but who are not chubby. I would personally suggest the term "Voluptuous" or "Curvaceous". So bottom line is I think this should seriously be considered as the "Average" category is way too general and hence the ladies who have a lot of curves should get their own category.
DuanCulo 03:55, 03 August 2009 (EDT)
- I don't like the term "voluptuous" because any busty women could be called voluptuous, and it's also possible for slim girls to have "nice curves and a big ass". I think we can just get rid of the "average" category all together. Anyone overweight can be "chubby" or "BBW", anyone with normal weight can be "slim", "muscular" or "athletic", and anyone underweight could maybe be "skinny". Claire Dames looks slim to me. Teddy 07:55, 3 August 2009 (EDT)
- Hi, DuanCulo. I noticed your "Voluptuous" suggestion, but said nothing because I'm not a big fan of the "Body type" category anyway. I think it's pretty subjective and rarely use it myself, except for obvious BBWs. (I remember getting into minor edit-wars over someone labeling some model "chubby" who looked "slim" to me...) That said, I agree with Teddy, that "voluptuous" (and "curvaceous") can pretty much mean "big-boobed", which fits all of our subjects here. Another editor was adding the description "zaftig", which, to me, is about the same thing. These terms all imply over-all more fleshy than "average", without being "chubby", but I think it's just too vague a term to be nailed down more objectively than the existing ones-- which are already too subjective themselves, in my opinion. Dekkappai 09:23, 3 August 2009 (EDT)
More TV tits
I don't find any pictures or info on Amanda Blake from "Gunsmoke" or Gloria LeRoy (Boom Boom from All in the Family). I think those are some major tits that should be added.
Not sure who wrote this but apparently you're new here. The suggestions page isn't where you request articles. I will research the two women you mentioned and if they seem acceptable then I will put in requests for them. Next time you want to request an article then you should go here:
http://boobpedia.com/boobs/Boobpedia:Requests
--DuanCulo 20:01, 11 August 2009 (EDT)
Search Rankings & User Ratings
Is there a system which ranks the most searched articles? If not do you think this would be a good idea? Also does the idea of having users rate the persons on the site and having a ranking for this a possibility?
--DuanCulo 20:37, 11 August 2009 (EDT)
Silly Suggestion?
Anybody think it would be a good idea to make a category for the ladies on boobpedia who have been arrested (eg. Katie Morgan, Claire Dames, Brittney Skye etc.) ? It's kind of a silly idea but it occurred to me that quite a number of them have been arrested (especially the porn stars) --DuanCulo 01:55, 22 September 2009 (EDT)
Search Suggestion
There are searchs by hair color, MILF, cup size, and nationality. Is there a way to integrate all the searchs? For example if your looking for a petite, caucasian, 5'6", with 34DD bra size you could narrow the field down much greater. Love the site by the way.
International bra sizes
Like many things in the world there isn't a standard on bra sizing. For example I'm sure I wasn't the only one who didn't really know what size a 98 H-metric really was.
So I did a little searching and found a great bra size converter. http://www.85b.org/bra_conv.php Since I love big boobed Japanese girls I often have that page open in a tab as browse the girls on this site. BTW the 98 H-metric belongs to Yoko Matsugane who would be a 42 F in the US.
I have a few possible suggestions.
The main page should have a bra size converter built into it or provide a link to one. Have a link to a bra size converter at the bottom of every page. In the measurement box also/only list the U.S. measurement
I wouldn't mind manually entering the U.S. sizes into the info boxes of my favorite women but it is obviously not the best solution.
Bustyluver 17:38, 2 November 2009 (EST)
Option for thumbnail picture as a search output option
When I try to identify a woman identify a woman by characteristics I would like to see (as a search option) a set of thumbnail pictures of the women meeting the search criteria. Clicking on a picture would lead to the woman's Boobpedia page.
User:Longwood247 17:35 17 March 2010 (PDT)
Bust and Bra sizes (American standards herein)
I think I am missing something here. According to all research I have seen about women's measurements and fitting bras ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brassiere_measurement ) the measurements are Chest (under breasts to get band size) waist (over belly button) and hips (over fullest part of hips and butt).
So, if someone is listed as 36-24-36, then she would wear a 36 bra. If she lists that she wears a 32G, that would be extremely tight around the chest. If she listed the proper one, with the exact same cup size, but a band that fits properly, this would be a 36 DD or E.
I saw one on here where a girl had, like, a 44-31-43 build, and yet it had her bra listing as 36I. That is ridiculous to say that stretching an extra 8 inches is something women would do. That 36I would also convert to a 44 D.
I guess being a guy with some Pecs, I could take my listing of 44 A, and say I wear a 32 G!!!
Comments?
msjayhawk 17:01, 19 October 2010 (EDT)
Duplicate Boobpedia entries
Teresa Orlowsky = Teresa Orlowski, Category:FEMJOY models = Category:Femjoy models Another l33cher 04:29, 26 April 2011 (EDT)
I have found that 2 people in the Latina section have 2 pages, causing those 2 persons to have 4 pages between them.
The first one is Lil Chica who has a page called Chica (http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Chica) and one named Lil Chica (http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Lil_Chica). If you like, you can go to http://www.freeones.com/html/l_links/Lil_Chica/ and look at her picture galleries and you will see that they are both the same.
The next one, Marisol De La Cruz has a page under the same name (http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Marisol_De_La_Cruz) and one under the name Marisol DeLa Cruz (http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Marisol_DeLa_Cruz) which is just the merging of the middle names. Their profile pics are from the same gallery.
I would like for the Chica's page to be merged with Lil Chica's under the name 'Lil Chica' (or for Chica's page to be deleted) and the same for Marisol De La Cruz under the name 'Marisol De La Cruz' (or for the one with the merged middle names to be deleted). I am new here and I do not know how to merge or delete pages. Therefore, I am leaving it up to you guys to do it for me. I would recommend doing this as I am currently looking through the Latina page and gets annoying when I see the same person mentioned more than once as it consumes my time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KCG (talk • contribs) . To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
- Welcome to Boobpedia, KCG. The articles are clearly the same person so I manually added the info from the Chica article to the Lil Chica article and edited Chica to redirect to the newly merged version. If you check the source for the redirect, you can see how I did this and then do the same for the articles on Marisol De La Cruz. Best of luck with your editing here. --Loose cannon 13:39, 11 March 2011 (EST)
- I've now redirected Marisol DeLa Cruz to Marisol De La Cruz. There wasn't any extra information in the page that I redirected. --Loose cannon 18:22, 20 March 2011 (EDT)
I wish I had visited the Suggestions category before. I came across a duplication of Ariella Ferrera as Ariella Ferrara a couple days ago, and sent a message through the Contact link. All of the valid links under Ferrara actually came out as Ferrera, so the duplication may have been merely a typo on the part of the submitter.
FreeOnes has an entire thread in their discussion forum about duplications, and I think it would be nice for Boobpedia to have a similar vehicle. buben8r 19:15, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
- Just created a separate page for duplicates. See you there! -- Bernie55 23:25, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
Biobox updates
Please add script, so that the eye color will automatically add category (as hair color does). Eye color is a bit more permanent than hair color, so it helps with identification.
Does Topless + Bush = Full Frontal? How about adding Butt (or Full Rear)? Bush suggests only pubic hair - If a shaved girl shows her labia in a rear shot, how do I list that? Another l33cher 04:24, 26 April 2011 (EDT)
Hot 100
It would be cool if there was a 1-10 scale to rate each girl, and if she got at lest 100 ratings of 8 stars or more she would make a list of the 100 hottest big boob stars at the moment. Then the total ammount of votes for her would be averaged to see what position she would be. ps2085 15:36, 3 August 2011 (EDT)
Policy on referral links
I checked the boobpedia FAQ, Help, and Policy pages but could not find an answer. Whose CCBill referrer links (and related) are these and are they permitted? Are they all owned by the website owner? Cassandra 00:21, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
- ccbill links could be for a variety of sites. if it's added by one of the admins then it's good. otherwise please bring it to my attention. thanks. --Hexvoodoo 03:35, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
- I found out that they were being generated by a template, and that the referrer links help Boobpeida out. I'm pleased to be adding them now.
Move page
Please move Haylie-Marie Coppin to Hayley-Marie Coppin. "Hayley" is the correct spelling, as seen on her website (hayley-secrets), Only-Tease, Art-Lingerie, etc. Cassandra (talk) 03:40, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
- done. --Hexvoodoo 04:04, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
Big-Breasted Penthouse Pets
I Have A Suggestion, Even Though Boobpedia Got The Category For Big-Breasted Playboy Playmates, Why Not Create A Page Nor A Category For Big-Breasted Penthouse Pets!!
Boob Types & Tattoo
Boob type section in the bio like 'firm', 'floppy' etc. would be nice. (For search / filter reason.) Also areolas ('tiny', 'large', 'puffy', 'light', 'dark') an nipple type ('thin', 'thick', 'long').
Also, like Piercing, Tattoos can be noted ('back', 'belly', 'tits', 'arm' etc.) this can help to find / identify. Done so on thenude.eu .
I like the idea. However, for the tattoos, I don't think the site's search engine is advanced enough to search for tattoos on specific body parts yet. --Ruben12321 17:18, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
Glamour model or adult model
Are topless models, such as Page 3 girls, glamour models or adult models? Category:Glamour models states "The Glamour models category is for busty women who have done primarily non-nude modeling. Examples are swimsuit models, Japanese Idols, fashion models, and fitness models. Nude models belong in the Adult models category". Teddy 06:41, 25 January 2012 (EST)
"Favorites"
It would be nice to be able to save girls onto a "Favorites" page rather than just a Watch-list. --Ruben12321 17:17, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
- If you mean a public list of your favorites, you can always add that to your user page, or create a subpage in your userspace (User:Ruben12321/Favorites, for example). The Honorable 18:43, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
Additional hair colors
Right now the template only seems to support hair color and hair color_2; there are quite a few performers that have run the full range of blonde, brunette and redhead. Similarly, while it gets to be splitting hairs (literally) at some point, additional options like auburn, pink etc. could be useful. Shin d 11:26, 8 June 2012 (EDT)
pls update the site with some new faces and Boobies pls...
Nipples Categories
In addition to long, puffy, pierced and inverted, we should have "small nipples", like the ones on lucy pinder and so many models
Areolas Categories
We should have a category for small areolas, medium areolas as well as the large areolas category thats there.
- A category for small areolae is ok, but I disagree with a category for medium areolae, as it would need to be added to about 15,000 articles. Teddy 14:29, 12 September 2012 (EDT)
pictures on disambiguation pages
we could post images of the models on the disambiguation pages instead of just listing their names. that way users could simply look for the model they want instead of clicking the names one at a time. just an idea to make browsing easier.
Mainpage of Boobpedia
Hello!
Can anybody tell me, why the mainpage didn't got updated for such a long time?
Greetings!
Frank
I agree, the main page should not have the same small selection of models every day for what seems like years. For an acive site, there should be different ones cycled in. Maybe randomized 6 models on each main page visit? Xewe 02:09, 17 March 2013 (EDT)
Categories for Pubic Hair Types
I would like to see a clickable category for pubic hair type (ie. full, trimmed, shaved,). It would also be awsome if categories could be combined with other categories or tags (ie. Redead + natural + trimmed) and your result would yield someone like Nikki Rhodes.
Robyn Ryder
why not merging Robyn (40something) with Robyn Ryder's profile?
Search
It would be nice to be able to search multiple stats of the bio box. Maybe call it specific search.
Suggestion
What if you add a section in which you can post an image of a pornstar asking the name and users can help find that pornstar. --Jorghex 04:29, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
Artificial Exclusion
The exclusion from Boobpedia B-cupers and even A-cupers is artificial and wrong.
F.i., what is the difference between Jessie Volt and Nikita Bellucci? Both are French. Both have pretty Natural boobs. Both have proportional bodies with curvaceous 36-inch hips. But Nikita Bellucci (5 ft 4 in) is taller in 3 inches than Jessie Volt and respectively has pretty C-Cups contra pretty B-Cups of Jessie. There’re no Big Tits Movies for both of them. But Nikita is on board and Jessie is out…
Com’n! If Boobpedia is for BIG boobs only, the C-cupers must be excluded too, their boobs aren’t big ones. IMO, we can deal with B-Cups & A-Cups either. --nonduc 11:18, 28 July 2014 (EDT)
- I accept the C-cup limit as one of the rules for contributing here. But I would be in favor of removing the C cup limit too. Boobs is boobs, and they're enjoyable in all shapes and sizes. Dekkappai 12:19, 28 July 2014 (EDT)
- How can you accept the wrong limitation? :-O It’s counter-productive for contribution. A lot of stars don’t enhance their A & B because their boobs have pretty natural form and are goodlooking. A large amount of natural boobs are excluded from boobs encyclopaedia. --nonduc 02:48, 30 July 2014 (EDT)
Define Occupational Categories
I think it would be nice to have an FAQ section giving definitions for Adult Model, Nude Model, Glamour Model, Actress and Porn Star. After having surfed Boobpedia for a few years, I just recently discovered the Nude Model category, and I wonder how this category differs from Adult Model. What really surprised me is that this category does not appear in the Categories page. Neither do I see categories for Sports Woman or TV Personality, but I do see one for Actresses.
My definitions- Amateur: A woman who is recorded by a non-professional camera person, or who is recorded without getting paid for the recording. Payment for any performance is automatic disqualification from Amateur status. The reputation of an Amateur is typically grown on the Internet via social media. Actress: A woman who performs professionally on stage or television, or in movies, without displaying nudity. Sports Woman: A woman known for participation in a sport or physical activity, such as Basketball, Bodybuilding, Bowling Tennis, Golf, Lacrosse, Baseball or Soccer, among others. TV Personality: A woman who regularly appears on television as a Talk Show Host or News Broadcaster. Glamour Model: A woman who, without displaying nudity, is regularly photographed or videotaped for the purpose of advertising performances, fashions, cosmetics or other products. Adult Model: A woman who has been professionally photographed or videotaped either nude or topless, which may include engaging in fondling or kissing with another person. Nude Model: A woman who has been professionally photographed or videotaped fully nude. Porn Star: A woman who has been professionally photographed or videotaped while engaging in coitus, fellatio or cunnilingus. Engaging in fondling or kissing with another person, by itself, does not qualify for this category. buben8r 19:01, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
Female body shapes
As a huge fan of the "hourglass" body shaped women, I have been looking for a way to find them easily. So many models these days... I found those formulas at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_body_shape They pretty much make sense for me. If you use the formulas for these ladies, for example : http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Jana_Defi, http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Karin_Spolnikova, http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Sylvia_McFarland would fall in the "Top Hourglass" category. http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Petra_Verkaik, http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Ava_Addams, http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Donna_Ewin would fall in the "Hourglass" category. And so on.
Regards, Below the formulas.
Hourglass If (bust − hips) ≤ 1" AND (hips − bust) < 3.6 " AND (bust − waist) ≥ 9" OR (hips − waist) ≥ 10" Bottom hourglass If (hips − bust) ≥ 3.6" AND (hips − bust) < 10" AND (hips − waist) ≥ 9" AND (high hip/waist) < 1.193 Top hourglass If (bust − hips) > 1" AND (bust − hips) < 10" AND (bust − waist) ≥ 9" Spoon If (hips − bust) > 2" AND (hips − waist) ≥ 7" AND (high hip/waist) ≥ 1.193 Triangle If (hips − bust) ≥ 3.6" AND (hips − waist) < 9" Inverted triangle If (bust − hips) ≥ 3.6" AND (bust − waist) < 9" Rectangle If (hips − bust) < 3.6" AND (bust − hips) < 3.6" AND (bust − waist) < 9" AND (hips − waist) < 10"