Boobpedia:Suggestions: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 96: Line 96:
If we visit a model's page, we could have a sort of 'if you liked model A, try models B and C'
If we visit a model's page, we could have a sort of 'if you liked model A, try models B and C'
:We do, but it's optional. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 04:44, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
:We do, but it's optional. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 04:44, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
::We could try making a standardized procedure for it...[[User:Cost|Cost]] 16:42, 15 May 2009 (EDT)


== Maritial status indication ==
== Maritial status indication ==

Revision as of 20:42, 15 May 2009

This is the page for making suggestions about Boobpedia. To add a new section, click here.

Booble Winners

How about having a template for it, just like the DanniGirls template? Cost 00:31, 15 December 2008 (EST)

This has been given a priority of C. If anyone has free time or is bored or whatever, feel free to do so. Cost 18:33, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Category intersection search

How about being able to search for women by a set of categories or tags? For example, go to a search page and have check boxes for each category. The user clicks the categories for the women they are interested in and a search reveals which women fit that criteria.

E.g. Checking boxes for Blonde, DD, and Fake would return Diamond Foxx, Shyla Stylez, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphaqup (talkcontribs) 03:39, 20 December 2008. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.

I've thought of this too-- say clicking Japanese, BBW & lactation brings up just the actresses/models who fit into all three categories. I don't think this kind of thing is possible though with the software. Someone with more technical expertise will have to answer. Dekkappai 00:00, 20 December 2008 (EST)
I've always wanted this too. This would be a really neat feature. Cost 22:08, 20 December 2008 (EST)
Wikipedia has been working on it forever -- see Wikipedia:Category intersection. The version of MediaWiki that Wikipedia is running sort of supports intersections, but it's clunky. The Honorable 13:03, 20 December 2008 (EST)
Does it say that somewhere in the version page? What did they install that allows this? Why is it clunky? -Thefixer 09:49, 22 December 2008 (EST)
I think it's built into newer versions of MediaWiki. Wikipedia is running 1.14alpha, which is too bleeding edge for other sites. And having to search for +incategory:"Category name 1" +incategory:"Category name 2" strikes me as clunky. *shrug* The Honorable 11:25, 22 December 2008 (EST)
How often do we update the sie to new versions of WikiMedia? And what requirements do we need to meet to get the newer versions of MediaWiki? Cost 23:03, 22 December 2008 (EST)
Good question. Also, you can probably just manually edit the search page and insert "incategory" input fields. -Thefixer 07:23, 23 December 2008 (EST)
I've been going around this limitation by using Google and the texts that the categories show on the page. So, for instance to google for look-a-likes of my sister-in-law, I'd search for:
   +site:boobpedia.com +Caucasian +"34E bra" +"Natural tits" +Average +Brunette
--LikeMnatural 17:17, 12 January 2009 (EST)

StumblePorn

http://stumbleporn.com/masters.php

This could help generate more traffic for our website.

According to Alexa, our global reach is down 33% while our page view is down only 5%. That means that even though less people are coming than before, the ones that are coming are viewing many pages and are staying longer on our site. Accordingly, we just need to bring people to our site, and they'll stay.Cost 22:17, 20 December 2008 (EST)

We could also try incorporating Google Analytics to see where our visitors are going and derive ways in which we can increase new traffic and maintain current visitors. Speaking of which, do the administrators here feel that we need to increase traffic?Cost 22:42, 1 January 2009 (EST)

New categories of actions

How about adding new categories of hardcore actions like creampie, DPP, DAP, IR —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipper (talkcontribs) 16:08, 22 December 2008. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.

Yeah, that would be nice. Cost 21:29, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Another word for Boobs and Tits

This website should have a dictionary nor a encyclopedia about boobs and tits. Also make a list of words like hooters, jugs, knockers, bazookas, melons, gazoombas, whoppers, fun bags, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VL2345 (talkcontribs) 04:37, 28 December 2008. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.

Good idea-- with as much legitimate etymology as we can dig up, and words in languages other than English (especially slang, with English translations) Someone start it up, and I'll be happy to contribute some choice Japanese & Korean ;) Dekkappai 23:50, 27 December 2008 (EST)
Yeah, there is probably a huge list on urban dictionary.Cost 12:06, 29 December 2008 (EST)
I'll see what I can do. Apara 20:10, 30 December 2008 (EST)
Alternate names for breasts, here you go. Apara 15:45, 31 December 2008 (EST)
That's a start! However, each term generally has a more specified and deeper meaning. For example, to scream is a synonym of to say, but not vice-versa. How can we incorporate these definitions on that page? I was thinking of having each one under its own heading, but that might get too cluttered. Cost 22:46, 1 January 2009 (EST)
I was looking up the origins for each words. But had no luck finding anything of now. Apara 02:16, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Wikipedia

Where can we see a list of all the Wikiepdia copied articles hereCost 15:26, 29 December 2008 (EST)

I don't know if there's a list (a category might be appropriate), but when I was going through the articles to remove "Wikipedia" notices from articles which had been deleted there, I put "GFDL" into the search box, and got a list of every article which had that notice. Dekkappai 15:42, 29 December 2008 (EST)
Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:GFDL shows every article that links to the GFDL template, which should be all of the Wikipedia imports. The Honorable 20:07, 29 December 2008 (EST)
Thanks. I was just fixing articles I imported from Wikipedia, and I thought it would be nice if I could go and fix other imported articles later on. I just did Sarah Blake, how is it? Cost 21:56, 29 December 2008 (EST)

Mammary intercourse

Anyone of you think putting it in the biobox or as a category saying that performer engages in it? Apara 02:16, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Is that the old titty fuck? Cost 07:03, 7 January 2009 (EST)
Not sure... I don't know what goes on in the U.S. and other porn industries, but for just about every one of the Japanese AV actresses, paizuri is a given... At least these days... On the other hand, it's one performance category I'd mark without feeling a need to source... Dekkappai 13:18, 7 January 2009 (EST)
I say go for it. This is a performance that's the exclusive domain of big-breasted women. Someone with an A- or B-cup wouldn't really be able to engage in this. Speaking of sourcing, how can you source performances? For the ones that are listed on LA Direct or something similar, you can look up their profile, but for the vast majority, you'd have to source a picture or a clip. That would be much harder to do. This Wikipedia article has more info on it.Cost 16:42, 7 January 2009 (EST)
Right, sourcing them is tricky, which is why I rarely mark them. I think sourcing them is important though-- I don't think we want to say "So & so gives BJs in public" if it's not verifiable. The way I've done is is to put a ref tag after marking "yes" in the BJ field. The ref tag gives a note saying "See: Back cover to the video, So & So Gives BJs to a Whole Buncha Guys! Part 13, where the back cover to that video clearly shows So & So engaged in the act. And we have the video cover uploaded, so it's easy to verify. Dekkappai 18:09, 7 January 2009 (EST)

AVN and other Awards

How should we put them up? Should we just follow the method that's been used on most of the pages right now? Cost 20:16, 13 January 2009 (EST)

I don't bother with them. If this wiki was more porn orientated, I would say go for it. Apara 20:30, 13 January 2009 (EST)

"Articles with new pictures" Section

Some of us agree that this section should be removed. Not only that isn't updated when a new picture is uploaded. It also promotes editors to upload a good amount of pictures, that isn't necessarily needed. Apara 13:51, 17 January 2009 (EST)

I concur. In my opinion, the entire homepage should be revised and revamped. Cost 22:00, 18 January 2009 (EST)
Yes, and regular updates would really be nice. I mean, I don't mind it now-- but if it were to change once a week or so, with a new feature, that would encourage people to look in. Dekkappai 22:44, 18 January 2009 (EST)
And, people might keep coming back then... Cost 18:36, 20 January 2009 (EST)

Boobmedia

As we have in Wikipedia, we might have a "Boobmedia", acting like a catalogue of the uploaded photos. Cheers! Biff.

Some of the pictures have been tagged with categories... Cost 15:42, 2 March 2009 (EST)
You are talking about Wikimedia Commons, which is used as a common media repository for different Wikimedia projects. There is no need for such here, the categories are sufficient as Cost said above. --LikeMnatural 05:01, 23 March 2009 (EDT)

Naturals

In the naturals section can we also break it down to bust and cup size

We could just use category intersection search for that. Cost 17:34, 6 May 2009 (EDT)

Updating Awards

Right now, the DanniGirls list/template is 5 months outdated. This is probably the case with other ones as well. As a grass-roots wiki organization, I think we should lets users take on roles/duties as they see fit. We should try to keep these lists updated. Right now, it feels like we've hit a plateau.

I've been maintaining the Big Naturals page right now. I want to do the DanniGirls one too, but I don't know how to make a template that will work the ones from past years. If you can give me a link that shows how, I'll be happy to do it.

Anyways, list what lists/etc you want to help maintain here. Cost 23:10, 5 May 2009 (EDT)

Hi, Cost. I assume we're all watching & maintaining our own subject-areas. I've been watching the Japanese series that I've created, and have a user-page to check for updates here. Maybe we could have more "official" pages for maintaining updates? But, for these particular articles, I'm the only one maintaining them, so I wouldn't think it necessary. I don't look in much at other areas of BP... Dekkappai 18:05, 6 May 2009 (EDT)


Recommendations

If we visit a model's page, we could have a sort of 'if you liked model A, try models B and C'

We do, but it's optional. Apara 04:44, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
We could try making a standardized procedure for it...Cost 16:42, 15 May 2009 (EDT)

Maritial status indication

How about a maritial status indicator in the biobox? It could say things like 'Married' 'Single' 'Divorced' etc.

I guess we could add that to the biobox. However, just remember that most pro porn stars don't really state this in their bios/interviews.Cost 16:41, 15 May 2009 (EDT)