User talk:Prophecy: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Fair use images: new section)
 
(138 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* [[User talk:Prophecy|Main talk page]]
* [[User talk:Prophecy|Main talk page]]
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 1|Archive 1]] from 2008-04-12 to 2008-08-05
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 1|Archive 1]] from 2008-04-12 to 2008-08-05
==Faster, Pussycat! Year! Year! ==
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 2|Archive 2]] from 2008-08-05 to 2008-12-07
Hi, Prophecy-- Yes, I agree we definitely don't want any more columns in the filmography listings. Actually, as far as commercial links, my References serve that purpose, though Boobpedia isn't getting any benefit from this, I guess. Also, I doubt many BP-users would even be able to use those site-- Most Japanese retailers don't ship overseas.
Thanks for catching the template goof-- I sometimes work too fast, at night, sleepy, and drinking, and am not as careful as I should be :-) I do go back and review my work constantly, so I'd have probably caught the mistakes eventually. About the ''Faster, Pussycat, Kill! Kill!'' year, though, I suspect 1966 is the correct date from the print source. I know IMdB and Wiki say 1965, but this would mean that ''Motorpsycho'' and ''Faster Pussycat'' were released the same month-- highly suspicious, as I know that ''Motorspsycho'' was sort of a rehearsal for ''Faster Pussycat''... Some pretty reliable websites like [http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/16/pcat.html THIS] say 1966. I'll hold off on changing it back though until I'm home tonight and can check the print source. I say, if the print source says '66, that's what we're using for our source, and that's the year we should use... (Wouldn't it be nice if ''we'' are more accurate than Wiki on this? That's what they get for driving away editors who really have an interest in content instead of Wiki-politics ;-) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:22, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
:Hey, wait-- I think I have access to contemporary ''Variety'' reviews and the ''AFI Catalogue''-- I'll check them later and let them decide the year. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:26, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
::Strange... I think I had August 1966, right? But here's what I find:
::* MOTOR PSYCHO 
::*:''Hollywood Reporter'' v.186 n.45 , 13 August 1965, p.3
::* FASTER, PUSSYCAT! KILL! KILL!
::*:''Hollywood Reporter'' v.189 n.20 , 08 February 1966
::*:''Variety'' 09 February 1966
::Which would indicate ''Motorpsycho'' was released in Aug '66, and ''Pussycat'' in Feb '66... And ''Faster Pussycat'' says released in '65, ''copyright'' '66... I'll try to dig up the original sources and check what they say. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:39, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
:::Ah HA! ''Faster Pussycat'' was given an L.A. showing on Aug 6, 1965, and then released nationally on Feb 1, 1966. (I ''assume'', but have no evidence, that the L.A. showing was a pre-release viewing, and that more post-production was done before the '66 release... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:51, 5 August 2008 (EDT)


== Fishnets ==
I've been noticing the uploading of fishnet clothing pictures. Some pin up article have pictures of them in fishnets. [[Lorraine Burnett]] and [[Marge Mellor]], come to mind.[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:10, 9 December 2008 (EST)
:Oh ok, well if you needed more, then you know where to look....[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:27, 9 December 2008 (EST)


== Swiss ==
== Movie Pages ==
While I was looking at the biobox of a few people. I noticed "Swiss" is a red link. But when I look at the Swiss category page. Their names are on the category. Sort of odd don't you think? I remember you were redirecting nationalites awhile ago. Maybe that was it? [[User:Apara|Apara]] 20:23, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
==Tango II (bra)==
Sure-- I read it last night. I'll see if I can touch it up quickly. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:25, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
:OK, done-- feel free to alter anything if I've inadvertently changed the meaning. :-) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:32, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
::By the way-- there were no real errors in what you wrote, I just made minor style adjustments, but the article as you wrote it was perfectly fine... "Distribution" does imply a distributor / company, I think... Maybe just "Models who wear... ?" [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 13:05, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
:::I'll think it over today and let you know if I come up with any possibilities... Oh-- I double-checked the print source I'm using on the Meyer films, and they agreed with the AFI & original years. Looks like we're right and IMDb/Wiki is wrong :-) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 13:33, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
:::Oh, one more thing-- about the question of whether to include non-busty and/or male actors in the "starring" field of the film infobox: How about this: We only put the featured busty actresses in the infobox "Starring" field, but then we have a separate "Cast" listing within the film article which lists everyone-- actors & actresses, with their role names, if known. I'll try to get started on this with the Meyer films tonight. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 14:18, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
::::No ideas on the bra list yet... I came across this little bit that may help with the Japanese bras, if it doesn't tell what you already knew: http://www.gijo.org/main/faq#faq3, and http://www.gijo.org/main/faq#faq4 [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:00, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
==Problems with Uschi's filmography==
Hi, Prophecy. I was just trying to work on [[Uschi Digard]]'s filmography, and came across a couple problems. I've got the best version I was able to put together saved at [[User:Dekkappai\Uschi]].
#First and foremost-- is a filmography this large, all templated, an abuse of Templates, and will it cause server problems? And if it is, what do we do with large filmographies?
#If I include the film ''[[Up!]]'' in the filmography, it messes up anything that comes below it-- all the film templates display as text "template" all squished into one box. If I put the film at the top of the list though, it works OK...
#This filmography has several "protect" links to commercial affiliates. I put these all under the "notes", and they worked fine in Preview mode, but BP won't let me save it, saying I'm trying to alter or remove Protected text. The only way I was able to save it in my workspace was to totally remove the links... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 02:40, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
:#Right. "Huge boobs" with an interesting, multiple derivation: De-kappu (D-cup) + Oppai (titties) or dekai (enormous -- the "k" doubled for emphasis) + oppai. Got it off an old [[Mariko Morikawa]] video. And no, I don't have them, though I've become uncomfortably aware lately, that that's how the name could be interpreted... No, I'm interested in them, very much so, the Asian variety particularly, but I don't ''have'' them unless you  mean "have" as in being happily married to someone with a couple :-) (Korean, not Japanese, but the Korean for "dekkappai" wouldn't serve me very well because of that country's unfortunate, but hopefully eventually to be rectified, lack of a big-bust industry.)
:#The Big Server Crash of August 6. '''''ME???''''' I'm '''''innocent!!!'''''. :-) No, really-- I wasn't doing anything at the time but checking recent changes. It happened at a time that I was on a computer where I'm unable to edit anything BP-ish. By the time it came to my lunch hour / BP-free editing time, BP had been down for a couple hours. No idea what could have done it...
:#Thanks for fixing ''Up!''-- I should have looked at the template. Where it goes in '76-- I don't know, since we don't have dates attached to the releases in the filmography yet. I or someone else will have to fix that up later.
:#The Protect tags-- yes, we're a small, level-headed, and agreeable group of editors so far, I really see no reason for those tags, and, apparently, they're going to prevent any kind of Filmography work... Even if we did have an editor who went on a Crusade to remove all the affiliate links, that kind of thing is easily reverted. And it seems like a "protect" tag should be added only ''after'' something like that happens... I'll try working around them like you said-- though I don't see how that would make any more difference than simply building the filmography around them as I did... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:42, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
::Well, what's odd is I ''did'' originally build my filmography around the protect tags, keeping the affiliate links and the tags intact, and it still wouldn't let me save it at the article... that's why I copied it to my user space. I had basically just reformatted the existing filmography and stuck the Protect tags and affiliate links into the Notes section, but BP wouldn't let me do that... Japanese lesson #2: By odd coincidence, Uschi's name has meaning in Japanese. I mean this as no reflection on the lovely lady herself, but "ushi" in Japanese means "cow"... which reminds me of a great Korean wild-goose chase I went on a while ago. My wife, ever sensitive to my interests :-) pointed out that there was a boob-centric Korean video made in the 1980s called "Cheosso Buin" ("Madame Milk Cow"). Unfortunately, research around the web turned up evidence that the title was just a lot of hype, and the lead actress was hardly BP-worthy :-( [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 12:14, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
:::Ah... I built the template filmography through global "Find & Replace" commands, so maybe I inadvertently added or removed a space or something in the "Protect" tags. I'll try redoing it tonight. I don't mind having them in the "Notes" field so much if there are no actual notes to the film. But if they start pushing out real data, then they become overly intrusive. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:06, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
:::By the way, they get pretty clever in playing around with the titles related to my user name. Check out [[Nozomi Takeuchi]]'s video titled "π" (Pi - pronounced "Pai" as in "Oppai"...:-) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:31, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
==Film template==
I thought All Movie Guide was in there as one of the Databases, but I don't see it now... Shouldn't it be there? For now, I'll just add it as external link. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:25, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
:Good-- One thing about AMG though is, they have a "Plot synopsis" main page, which is often useful. But sometimes they also have a "Review" which is useful in its own right, and sometimes written by a different critic than the one who wrote the synopsis. In the film template, Wiki only links to the Plot synopsis. We might want both? Or maybe we're loading the template up to much, and the Review should go in external links? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:43, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
::Uschi: I copied and pasted the protected text into the notes field, and again it wouldn't let me save it. I'm sure nothing was changed between the "Protect" parameters this time... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 02:41, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
:::I was trying to save it at Uschi's article, the filmography. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 11:11, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
::::I see you managed to save it, but it looks like the afilliate/protect tags are completely gone? How'd you manage that, and is this what we should be doing? Seems to me that these "protect" tags are a big pain in the ass, and for absolutely no good reason-- None of us would intentionally remove/alter them, but they're making our editing difficult... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 11:39, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
:::::Ouch! My condolences, Prophecy. I know how this kind of thing hurts. I was working on ''[[The Joy of Big Tits]]'' on a day that the server was down. I worked long and hard on it all day-- probably about 12 hours. Then when I was exhausted and ready to call it a night and go to bed, I thought I'd create an "image upload" file to make uploading easier. Get this: I OVER-WROTE the original article file!!! That was not a happy moment :-(
:::::By the way, Prophecy-- you mentioned thinking about starting an article on the film ''Eyes Wide Shut'' (I haven't seen the film yet) because it had a scene with a busty actress in it, but deciding that this alone didn't fulfill BP's inclusion category. How did you work around this problem? I ask because I recently saw a 1960s Japanese historical drama (set in ancient China) which has a couple scenes of a spectacularly-built Japanese actress. I haven't been able to find her name yet, and the film would not qualify as a big-bust film just based on these couple scenes with one supporting actress... What to do? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:18, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
::::::She's not top-, but one of the recurring characters in the film. She's the wild & strong wife of the leader of a band of outlaws. You see her through the film, and then towards the end, while her husband is away, she gets horny and decides to take her frustrations out on one of the other outlaws. She rips off her own blouse and-- WOW-- :-) And the director (Koji Wakamatsu-- very respected in ''pink films'') keeps coming back to that scene, even after the loving's over, and she, fortunately for us viewers, sees no reason to put her clothes back on :) Maybe "Big tits in such & such a film?" Anyway, until I can get some information on her, it's all speculation for now. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:01, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
:::::::Well, the Meyer filmographies weren't taken from IMDb, but from the AFI Catalog (Apara tells me that one of these is in error). I didn't know what format to put the cast in, so I just made that up. Maybe a table would be better? Doris Wishman? Yes, I think she deserves an article. She made several nudist films with our subjects in the early '60s, then the 2 big Chesty Morgan films. So, Wishman is definitely BP-material, though I don't feel inspired to start that article soon... eventually though... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:17, 10 August 2008 (EDT)


== "It's nearly impossible to have smaller areolas" ==
For a few of the articles, I want to mention that the performer performed in the infamous pardory ''Who's Naylin' Paylin?.'' How do you make those pages?  [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:37, 10 December 2008 (EST)
:Yes. I forgot to add that... [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:42, 10 December 2008 (EST)


Do you want to explain [http://www.boobpedia.com/butler/index.php?title=Lily_Anderson&diff=70730&oldid=70727 that comment]? If that is small, what does large look like? -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 19:08, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
== Booble Girls ==
: Can you give me an example from this site of the '''minimum''' size which you consider large? That way I'll only categorize by that from now on. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 05:07, 10 August 2008 (EDT)


A [[Boobpedia:Suggestions|request]] has been made for a [[:Template:DanniGirls|DanniGirls]]-type template for [[:Category:Booble Cover Girls|:Category:Booble Cover Girls]], if you're interested (and don't have any other projects you're working on :) ) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 22:09, 15 December 2008 (EST)


== What do you think ==
== Supporting Actresses and Sequels ==
Of this whole dilemma, that happened the over a day and half? (If you haven't noticed). [[User:Apara|Apara]] 11:00, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
:He/she was told many times about having it discussed. But didn't listen. I'm sure it wouldn't had been a problem. But too late now. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 11:43, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
::I actually told him about what he was doing. Before reverting anything. I told him or her to stop. Until it was discussed. Even Dekkappai and Hex told him the same. But he or she didn't listen. Then got banned. I didn't want to cause anything, but reverting his edits was appropriate on my take. I was really annoyed when my user paged got renamed. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 11:51, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
:::Here's the talk page: http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/User_talk:Wufei05 [[User:Apara|Apara]] 11:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
::::You are right. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 12:04, 13 August 2008 (EDT)


My 2-cents: I think Apara handled the situation completely appropriately. The new editor started making major prject-wide category changes with his/her very first edit. After several of these, Apara politely suggested waiting for a discussion. The new editor continued, and even reverted Apara when he reverted a few of these edits-- laying the grounds for an edit war. It was the new editor who created the entire mess, after several warnings from the three of us (hex included). So I think, no, this situation could not have been avoided, and the new editor <s>borders on vandalism</s> (strike that: ''IS'' a vandal, after I see what he did to Apara's page). I fully support a block. And by the way-- welcome back, Prophecy-- I was wondering where you went! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 13:05, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
What do we do with supporting actresses? Should we include them in the template or just the article? The two films that have this are ''[[Pirates]]'' and ''[[Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge]]''.


::::: Oh, I just discovered the whole discussion after I wrote my comments... [[User:Prophecy|Prophecy]] 13:15, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
The latter is also the sequel to the former. Should I put it type=episode in the template for them?


==Template concerns==
[[User:Cost|Cost]] 13:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)
Hi, Prophecy. I've tried to load the [[Uschi Digard]] page several times, and it won't work... (It did work just now, on probably the 6th or 7th try.) Russ Meyer took quite a while... Does this spell trouble in template-ville? I'm planning on templating the [[List of Cinema Unit GAS DVDs]] article, because almost all of those DVD covers also go on one or more actress page. I'll separate the list into year first, but still I'm concerned-- are these templates going to load? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:56, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
:Yeah, that's what I was planning on doing too. [[User:Cost|Cost]] 02:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)
:OK-- Uschi loaded just fine, and quickly right now... So who knows what's going on? Anyway, I'll forge ahead with the templating plans. Once I break the big GAS list into years, there will be less than a couple dozen videos in each sub-article, so it shouldn't be too bad. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:28, 14 August 2008 (EDT)


== Since you started the article ==
You probably have something to say, [[Talk:Madonna]]. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 03:07, 4 January 2009 (EST)


==Problem with Google template?==
==Micro Tits Ciccone==
Hi, Prophecy. I've been noticing that the closing parenthesis on the Google template seems to have a line-break before it. Check out the sourcing at [[:Image:Moa Anzai.jpg]] (my latest discovery/obsession ;) for an example. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:30, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
Sure, but she has not looked like the black and white photo for almost 25 years, the new photo is what she looks like. Madonna is NOT a C and barely ever was, in her early days she was virtually flat chested. I have sent pics to an editor to show you what I mean. Cone bras does not a bust make. My text is very relevant to boobpedia so I'm disappointed that is deleted. The article reads like a madonna fan cut and paste-this is a site about big boobs not over hyped ones. Also anyone who would use Lynsey in the same sentence madonna does not know their boobs. madonna needs to be compared to smaller women. Just an opinion. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)
:Thanks-- I noticed the server hiccup, and I figured the fix was going on :-) Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:50, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
 
::One more minor template issue: If you check out [[Moa_Anzai#Life_and_career]], you'll see the inline templates of video titles (Big Tits Moa 111K and Big Tit All Stars, Vol. 1) are not italicized, which they should. I'm stepping out now, so won't be editing and interfering should you decide to update the code. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 17:32, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
Why was the picture deleted? That is WHAT SHE LOOKS LIKE.
:::OK-- strange that the title is italicized alright in the filmography, but can't be italicized in an inline reference... anyway, I think it's fairly important to italicize film titles, so I've devised a work-around. Unfortunately that work-around means we either have to have all the non-title info (year & director) in italics also, or put that non-title info outside the template... I took the latter course. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 20:32, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)
::::Thanks! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:02, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
 
Hi Prophecy. OK, I have to admit to not paying much attention to many of the parameters in the "Biobox new" template. One that's confused me is "Frontal" I take this to mean fully nude, "Frontal"? If so, it is confusing to me why a certain editor has removed "Yes" from frontal at [[Chiharu Mizushima]]... Mizushima has done full nude (with nothing censored-- i.e., illegal in Japan) hardcore, etc. pretty much anything and everything I could think of that would be called "Frontal"-- and much of it is easily found on the Web. So wouldn't that be a "yes"? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:44, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
 
:No trouble... Just an opportunity to display [[:Image:Chiharu Mizushima fronta.jpg‎|the flower of Mizushima's womanhood]]. And a lovely sight it is to behold ;) Much more aesthetically pleasing to me than all these male appendages I'm coming across in other articles :-(... Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 11:19, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
Hi, it's breastking, I responded to you on the madonna page. i wrote most of Russ Meyer's wikipedia page btw. Madonna is the Anti-Super Vixen in every way shape and especially form! Best WishesBreastKing 07:20, 5 January 2009 (EST)
==Video articles==
 
You know, while we were developing these video templates (which I'm really just now starting to implement), you mentioned thinking the front-cover (smaller) image should be at least 240px for a potential future article on the video. I commented that there probably wouldn't be such articles, and that the images were just going to be used in filmographies... Well, the more I hunt around and research, the more I think you were right. I probably still have a bit of a Wikipedia mentality left over, "Any film less 'notable' than ''Citizen Kane'' is subject to deletion review, and even ''Kane'' had better cover his ass with plenty of 'reliable' sourcing!"... I'm finding good, lengthy, professional reviews (in Japanese) of each individual video, and well-written fan-based reviews in English. It certainly wouldn't be beyond the scope of BP to have such articles... I'll try to find images at least 240px when I can... screen caps could be used to illustrate particular scenes, reviewer ratings could be discussed, etc... BP's still a young and small project, so we're still covering the basics, but it's a thought for the future... and further justification of these templates. Just some thoughts... Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 19:55, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
I responded again on the Mandonna page.Regarding my great article on Russ Meyer from wikipedia, you are extremely incorrect and lying as there are tons of notations and citations on my wikipedia article, THAT I PUT IN, that's why I was awarded my Barn Star for it as it was only two paragraphs when I got there.Perhaps you are not clear as to what my wikipedia name is? I also wrote most of the other Russ Meyer related pages correcting mistakes.
:Right-- I kind of circle around in my editing... I'm back with the Japanese actresses now, but I'll get back to Gaston Lachaise soon-- lots more sourcing to go through with him... I'm not into comics, but I've got in mind an article on the cartoonist Gilbert Hernandez also-- Know him? [http://www.grovel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/heartbreak-soup-02.jpg This] and [http://www.newinspirationalmovement.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/luba.jpg this] may give you an idea why his work has caught my eye as a potential BP subject. GREAT work on the [[Katja Ehrhardt]] article by the way! OK-- back to work! Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 21:00, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
http://www.smh.com.au/ffxImage/urlpicture_id_1037490053060_2002/11/17/18ent_madonna.jpg
::Did I just cause a small crash? I uploaded 32 video templates. Things slowed down in the middle of the uploading, and I waited a while. Everything was fine until I uploaded the [[List of Cinema Unit GAS DVDs: 2007]] article. It registered in the "recent changes," but I couldn't get it to display. I was at another computer about half and hour later, and couldn't get Boobpedia to load at all. I'm back home and everything seems fine now-- I can see the list article... Think things are alright now? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 19:55, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 
:::OK, I'll proceed with caution... Last night I started [[List of Cinema Unit GAS DVDs: 2006]], which was half-complete (30 templates were on the article, but only half had content), and it seemed to go fine... Although Uschi's filmography templates are almost all empty as well... You're right, the more prolific actress articles are the ones that are going to give us more trouble here... Uschi seems to be working fine right now-- I'll take out that template list & save it to my workspace. Hopefully we have no crash :-) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 10:38, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
==Happy New Year==
:::Strange... I got into Uschi's article fine and removed the templates, but now I can't open my own Uschi filmography-- at my user space... I'll save it on disk. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 11:13, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
Happy New Year to you too, Prophecy! I don't know if you've noticed, but we received some big news for [[Fuko]] on the new year-- She's going all-out AV. (Personally, I'd prefer just nude-posing, but I'll take AV without complaint if it comes to that ;) About other editors, yes, I see what you mean... I haven't followed what this is all about, but there was a certain editor at WP involved in the Russ Meyer page who was also changing Fuko's measurements at random, calling them "real" measurements, but based on pure guess-work... I hope this sort of bat-shittery isn't coming over here... One of WP's bad habits is carrying assumptions of good faith beyond the breaking point for disruptive users, while being unnecessarily harsh on good contributors. I trust BP's administrators will not fall into that trap though :) Looking forward to another year of good work with you. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)
==More minor template issues==
:I fear it's getting even worse than pixels. You notice the stars over her nipples on the video cover, I assume? There's a new wave of censorship sweeping Japan. I hope that doesn't mean AV DVD covers are going to start looking like that!  :-( [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:15, 6 January 2009 (EST)
Hi again Prophecy... While working with these templates, I'll probably come across more minor issues. One is the Series / Notes fields (I think I mentioned this before). I'm finding that I'm pasting Series info twice, once in both fields, to get it to show in the "Notes" field-- which I think is useful. If you're fine with this redundancy, it doesn't bother me much either. The second issue is a little more significant. If you look at [[Mammary_intercourse#In_Japan]], you'll see I've made reference to a video, and the template puts it as "Big-Titted Tit-Fucking Perverted Woman: Kira Namikaze (Jiro Kanoko, 2007)", which is fine, except that it doesn't give a source/reference. The citation will appear in the "References" section, of course, but we won't be able to tell the exact point in the text that it refers to, because the "Release date" is not listed inline. Actually, I think, for videos, that displaying release date inline ''would'' be useful and appropriate, and that would solve the citation problem also. I tried entering <nowiki>"{{film|GAS-062|released=1|director=1}}"</nowiki>
::Hi, Prophecy-- I have a question on [http://www.boobpedia.com/butler/index.php?title=Harumi_Nemoto&diff=94725&oldid=94675 this edit] at [[Harumi Nemoto]]. Did you mean to re-locate the References section up from the bottom? If so, why? I thought we'd agreed References at bottom was to be a BP-standard. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)
instead of <nowiki>"{{film|GAS-062|year=1|director=1}}"</nowiki>, but this didn't work. Would adding this variation to the inline citation be too much trouble at this point? The alternative would be to put the citation after the inline template in the article, but that defeats at least some of the purpose of the template, and would also result in a mysterious double-citation (one from the actual template, which does not indicate where it came from within the text)... Also, the issue of inline citations of actual films will come up eventually... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 13:43, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
::I notice you removed the Ja-wiki link in the lead with that edit also. I've been including that as a standard format in the Japanese model articles... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:51, 6 January 2009 (EST)
:(Sorry for posting that in the wrong section) anyway-- is this a solution? In [[:Template:GAS-062]], I've moved the citations to the "name" field. This displays fine, so far, in filmographies and inline citation. In an article on the video itself, it's going to display in the title portion of the infobox, above the video cover image, I assume-- which is fine, I would think. The only possible issue with this I can see is how that field is used-- The template is not going to be looking for a film article with that exact name, is it? I assume the template looks for the exact text after the "article" field... When and if we do start articles on individual Japanese videos, this will be a minor issue since I prefer identifying them by the "ID#" rather than the Original Research-ish English title I've made up, or copied from the poor-English on the video cover, but again, not a big issue... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 14:17, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
:::Oops. It was Apara. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 23:12, 6 January 2009 (EST)
::(Please let me know as quickly as you can if putting the reference in the "Name" field is an acceptable solution, since I'm preparing templates right now. Cheers!) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 14:29, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
==A weighty issue==
:::Series / Notes solution: Perfect-- just the solution I had in mind, thanks! :) The inline citation problem: No, those mysterious numbered citations in the reflist section corresponding to no number in the text (which results from using the template inline) does seem to me to be a pretty important problem. It's the kind of thing that can be very frustrating for a reader, and will make our articles look bad... So, if there really is no way to work around this, I think we'll just have to not use the templates inline... I guess we can't use them everywhere... Actually, the template sourcing is for the data contained within the template, which is not normally part of an inline mention of the film, so there really is no need to use a source from the template in an inline reference. The only advantage to having the template used inline is if the year, title or director of the film/video is changed within the template. (In the case of the videos, where the data is difficult to find, and can potentially be corrected later, this is a valid use for the template, but I think the citation problem is a bigger issue...) I guess we'll have to just use the templates for Infoboxes and Filmographies. Anyway, thanks for all the work, and I'll continue on! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:32, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
Hi, Prophecy. I've got an interesting problem here... I've just discovered that two of "my" models are the same person... She used the name [[Pine Miyazaki]] when she was a plump-ish big-bust model for [[Cinema Unit GAS]], then she put on some weight and became a full BBW model under the name [[Yui Kyomoto]]... So her two infoboxes are the same in many points, but very different in other points-- waist and hip measurements particularly. What to do? I'm going to go ahead and put two separate infoboxes in the merged article, but that looks clunky, and makes the "Alias" field redundant... Any better suggestions? (Incidentally, I find she made quite a few videos under a third name-- whether that involves any significant body changes, I don't know yet.) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:04, 13 January 2009 (EST)
==Thanks again==
:I've merged the two into her first stage name-- [[Momoko Okada]]-- and, again, their are significant physical differences, though she is the same model. Apparently she's been gaining weight throughout her career, beginning in 2004. The gain is reflected in the cup-size also-- from G (Japanese) to J. (And a very pretty girl, thin or fat, in my book :-) Tell me if the article can be tidied up in any way-- looks awfully cluttered to me, with three infoboxes, but I don't know how else to get around this problem. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:55, 13 January 2009 (EST)
Hi, Prophecy. I finally finished templating the [[Cinema Unit GAS]] DVD list, and now I'm plugging them into the actress articles. I have to thank you again-- this makes the process of adding new videos to filmographies amazingly easy... Only one thing I've come across while doing this is that when an actress has a non-templated film on her filmography, the process of creating a "temporary" inline template is actually much more time-consuming than creating an actual template... Maybe I'll just keep these in tables (creating a temporary, awkward double-filmography) when I don't have time to create a full template... Anyway, Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 12:15, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
::Hi, Prophecy... Well, I'd agree with you normally-- such as with your Lindsay example-- but in this case, the actress is almost making a different "character" for each name/weight change. The data within each name seems to be consistent, but once she has upped her weight, she changes name, character, and the info that goes with it... Yet she is still the same person, so I don't think separate articles on each one would be the answer either... How about making separate sections within the article for each "identity", with each one having its own biobox? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:40, 13 January 2009 (EST)
==Non-template filmographies?==
:::Ah... can't relocate the biobox to another section? That will be a problem... I haven't dug into this case enough to be 100% sure, but I suspect I will find that other data does change also... height might stay the same, but birthplace may change, as, obviously, the name does... I'll make this article a research project-- this model has caught my eye in the past, in all three of her incarnations as a pleasing subject for further research :-) -- and I will fill you in on the details once I have found the information... Maybe three separate, inter-linked articles will be the best way to go? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:48, 13 January 2009 (EST)
Hi, Prophecy. Again, the templates are working out great! I have a question though: My old table-based filmographies look quite different and obsolete now, compared to the new ones. I think most of the current ones-- filmographies of fairly major (within the genre) actresses & labels-- can be templated eventually. However, there are some situations that will never require templates, I don't think. The case that brings this to mind is an article/filmography I'm planning on a candid-camera sort of series, where the cameraman basically films busty and BBW women walking down the streets of Japan. I find the subject quite worthy of an article, but there would be no need to template the individual videos, since we're not going to have articles on any of the individual women, or, most likely, any of the individual videos. Doing the regular inline "temporary" template would probably be inappropriate in a case like this also... Could you give me table-based code which would make a table that looked the same as the new template filmographies? Or is there another way around this? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:33, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
::::I agree, it would be best to be in one article. But it's true, this is an unusual case. She's obviously the same person, but she's creating a different persona for each physical change... Like I say, I'll research her, and think more about it. Once I get more info on the subject I'll ask you, and maybe get the Admins involved too. Got to go now-- cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:54, 13 January 2009 (EST)
:Thanks Prophecy. Right, I could build this sort of filmography through the Film template-- but doing this with Uschi has caused problems, so I thought that when the actual templates are unnecessary, just doing it as a table would be better-- as long as we can make table that look identical to the new template filmographies. I'll experiment both ways though to see what works best. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 23:49, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
==Comparison==
::...That makes sense... but the Uschi filmography only had two or three films with actual film template files... the rest were just calls to the "Film" template... anyway, I'll experiment and see how things work both ways. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:14, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
Hi Prophecy-- I'm currently editing where I don't have the leisure of doing any image-viewing... Hence, the harmless category-adding and linking edits. I'll check tonight (my night-- morning, or whatever for you-- about six-seven hours from now). [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:31, 15 January 2009 (EST)
==DVD / VHS release?==
:I had a look for myself. They seem to have the same eyebrows (which isn't much). But I can't really see any similarities at all. I tried looking for birth marks/moles, but couldn't find any. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Hi Prophecy... on the videos, occasionally I've come across conflicting release dates, and now I see what the issue is: They're released in 2 formats, on different dates. Do we want to address DVD / VHS release date? Or just go with the earliest release, and ignore the format? In my old table-filmographies, I used to include both releases, but it's probably no really necessary. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 11:26, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
 
:Ah, that would work. But would it foul anything up if I put the format after the date? Like: "September 28, 2007 (DVD) <break> December 28, 2007 (VHS)"? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 11:34, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
== Spam blacklist ==
::OK-- working out fine. Thanks! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 12:00, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
 
I've taken it off the list. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 18:53, 27 January 2009 (EST)
 
==Bad news==
Hi, Prophecy. I see you've been busy at work here. I've been trying to keep up with the Japanese series too-- lots of great stuff going on over there these days :) Horrible news though: My home computer became basically useless last night. The system's all screwed up-- way out of date anyway... I now have no Internet, to say the least. No image capabilities, and probably not even able to do text editing... Also I see they've now disabled image downloading at the public computers I use too... So, I'm going to be, basically, unable to contribute here except for text, and that only very rarely... I'll do what I can to keep up with things until I can get the home computer situation fixed! I'll try to check in as often I can, and keep a record of what's going on with the Japanese videos/actresses. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:42, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
:Jeez, I didn't know you'd take the news so hard! I think I've got the problem fixed now, so work on the Japanese boob community should re-commence tonight or tomorrow. Glad to be back! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:06, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
::No problem-- just kidding above :) The magnificent [[Mitsumi Nanao]] caused the trouble-- I was trying to view a video of hers, and downloaded software that screwed up some of my system files. Anyway, now that I've got Internet again, I'll dig back in on Mitsumi! Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:11, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
==Video Company/Studio/Label template?==
Hi Prophecy. I noticed your nice manufacturer templates, but couldn't find a similar one for video (or film) studios & labels. I'd like to put a template, or at least the company logo on appropriate pages-- I've started quite a few on Japanese studios & labels. Should I just use the manufacturer template? Or would it be worthwhile to create a new film or video studio template? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:14, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
:OK-- I'll just do the logos for now, but more specific templates are something to think about for future projects. Although I suspect a lot of the general studio information is going to be difficult to find on Japanese subjects. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:57, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
==The template problem==
Hi Prophecy. About the filmography template problem: More and more actress pages load sooo slowly due to the templated filmographies. At [[Mitsumi Nanao]], I'm experimenting with a new format. Just a text filmography in the actress' article, and a link to the "Main filmography" article at the top. Do you think that works? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:30, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
:Good-- I guess I'll start doing that as a standard for filmographies over, maybe ten entries? And the template entries on the actress' main page will be just those in which she is the star. I don't want to get back to putting in those cumbersome tables again, so just a text entry with a link to a full, templated filmography should work. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 10:51, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
 
== removed photos ==
 
hi prophecy, the removals were requested by a copyright agent working on behalf of one or more of the photographers. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:14, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
:that agent referred to her by one of her stage names. i assume he searches the internet for all images of her using that stage name. since i have no idea which photographers the agent represents, i don't know whether a photo from a different photographer would trigger another email. it's best to leave that page alone for now. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:38, 30 April 2009 (EDT)
 
== Template Lists ==
 
Do you know how to make template list, like the [[DanniGirls]] one? [[User:Cost|Cost]] 10:25, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Biobox new
:Hi, Prophecy. Cost pointed me to these list templates, which I haven't used yet. I couldn't think of an immediate use for them for my own work, but I have found a site which lists sales rankings (popularity) of busty/BBW models. Maybe this template would work for creating a list/template of their #1 model for each month... One thing though-- the list template itself doesn't seem to have much advantage over just listing the models manually. (Obviously, the template that goes on the model pages does offer an advantage.) But if there would be a way to add a thumbnail photo of the model in the straight lists, as at [[DanniGirls]], I think that would be a significant advantage. Is it possible? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
::Right now, the [[DanniGirl]] templates only go from 2006-2008. I was planning on adding the 2009 models to it. Other list templates, like the playboy and penthouse one can also be updated. [[User:Cost|Cost]] 17:12, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
:::That worked. I'll do some of the other lists as well. I just saw the real penthouse list and it goes up to 1969... I have my work cut out for me. Anyways, by posting on the suggestions page, I'm hoping other volunteers and lurkers will get encouraged to take the initiative to contribute. Hopefully it works.... [[User:Cost|Cost]] 17:24, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
::Hi again, Prophecy. Thanks for the explanation... I'm not sure I follow though. I don't think it was the images that caused the template/server problem. Remember our Uschi filmography test? That one had no images at all-- or maybe just one or two. I don't think it would be necessary at all to make sure that the biobox and the template photos are the same, so there's no need-- at least in my mind-- to make the biobox an all-purpose template. I would think just keeping the list template and adding a photo parameter would do... and wouldn't add much more stress to the server than the list template already has. Or am I not following? Anyway, I'll keep this in mind to try out for that "Top model of the month" list later on. Oh-- and Cost-- Sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you were asking if I knew how to do the template, meaning that I should give it a try-- I didn't realize you were asking for advice. But I've never used it anyway, so Prophecy is the right guy to ask :-) Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 03:28, 9 May 2009 (EDT)
 
== Biobox new ==
Hi Prophecy,
I am trying to use the Biobox new template in another wiki. I am using all the related templates as well as the monobook and common.css configuration. But I'm facing a problem. In the performances section even if i leave these fields empty the keywords continue appearing (Topless, Bush, Full frontal, Pink, Masturbation, Dildo, Fisting, etc.) and the categories are also being added at the bottom.
It's a brilliant template. I want to use it and properly attribute it to Boobpedia.
Do you have any idea why is this happening?
Thank you in advance--[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 11:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)<br>
Hi Prophecy, thank you for your kindness and your offer to help me. What I've seen (after testing) is that the template is working fine in MediaWiki 1.13.3 (or earlier) but it won't work in 1.14. Can you think of a quick fix for that or maybe guide me towards a solution? Thank you again. Have a nice day! --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 03:37, 12 May 2009 (EDT)<br>
I have further problems of compatibility between the template and Mediawiki's version :( <br>
Look [http://morfogenesis.com/index.php?title=Template:Biobox_new this], for example<br>
Let me check the issue and I'll call you back. Many thanks! --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 06:30, 13 May 2009 (EDT)<br>
Hi Prophecy, any news about the issue on Biobox new? Thanx. --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 04:57, 25 May 2009 (EDT)
 
== Tattoo category? ==
Hey Prophecy, long time, no talk.
 
I wanted to ask your opinnion on a category of women here on Boobpedia with tattoos. You think this would be relevant or a waste of server space? [[User:Apara|Apara]] 02:58, 13 May 2009 (EDT)
:Thanks for the feedback, I was thinking the same as you were. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 01:47, 15 May 2009 (EDT)
 
== Fair use images ==
 
Hi. Under the terms of fair use images, they should only be used within articles. Therefore please could you remove any fair use images on your user page. Thanks. [[User:Boobs Online|Boobs Online]] 18:16, 31 December 2012 (EST)

Latest revision as of 23:16, 31 December 2012

Fishnets

I've been noticing the uploading of fishnet clothing pictures. Some pin up article have pictures of them in fishnets. Lorraine Burnett and Marge Mellor, come to mind.Apara 23:10, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Oh ok, well if you needed more, then you know where to look....Apara 23:27, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Movie Pages

For a few of the articles, I want to mention that the performer performed in the infamous pardory Who's Naylin' Paylin?. How do you make those pages? Cost 18:37, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Yes. I forgot to add that... Cost 18:42, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Booble Girls

A request has been made for a DanniGirls-type template for :Category:Booble Cover Girls, if you're interested (and don't have any other projects you're working on :) ) The Honorable 22:09, 15 December 2008 (EST)

Supporting Actresses and Sequels

What do we do with supporting actresses? Should we include them in the template or just the article? The two films that have this are Pirates and Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge.

The latter is also the sequel to the former. Should I put it type=episode in the template for them?

Cost 13:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Yeah, that's what I was planning on doing too. Cost 02:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)

Since you started the article

You probably have something to say, Talk:Madonna. Apara 03:07, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Micro Tits Ciccone

Sure, but she has not looked like the black and white photo for almost 25 years, the new photo is what she looks like. Madonna is NOT a C and barely ever was, in her early days she was virtually flat chested. I have sent pics to an editor to show you what I mean. Cone bras does not a bust make. My text is very relevant to boobpedia so I'm disappointed that is deleted. The article reads like a madonna fan cut and paste-this is a site about big boobs not over hyped ones. Also anyone who would use Lynsey in the same sentence madonna does not know their boobs. madonna needs to be compared to smaller women. Just an opinion. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Why was the picture deleted? That is WHAT SHE LOOKS LIKE. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)


Hi, it's breastking, I responded to you on the madonna page. i wrote most of Russ Meyer's wikipedia page btw. Madonna is the Anti-Super Vixen in every way shape and especially form! Best WishesBreastKing 07:20, 5 January 2009 (EST)

I responded again on the Mandonna page.Regarding my great article on Russ Meyer from wikipedia, you are extremely incorrect and lying as there are tons of notations and citations on my wikipedia article, THAT I PUT IN, that's why I was awarded my Barn Star for it as it was only two paragraphs when I got there.Perhaps you are not clear as to what my wikipedia name is? I also wrote most of the other Russ Meyer related pages correcting mistakes. 18ent_madonna.jpg

Happy New Year

Happy New Year to you too, Prophecy! I don't know if you've noticed, but we received some big news for Fuko on the new year-- She's going all-out AV. (Personally, I'd prefer just nude-posing, but I'll take AV without complaint if it comes to that ;) About other editors, yes, I see what you mean... I haven't followed what this is all about, but there was a certain editor at WP involved in the Russ Meyer page who was also changing Fuko's measurements at random, calling them "real" measurements, but based on pure guess-work... I hope this sort of bat-shittery isn't coming over here... One of WP's bad habits is carrying assumptions of good faith beyond the breaking point for disruptive users, while being unnecessarily harsh on good contributors. I trust BP's administrators will not fall into that trap though :) Looking forward to another year of good work with you. Cheers! Dekkappai 09:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)

I fear it's getting even worse than pixels. You notice the stars over her nipples on the video cover, I assume? There's a new wave of censorship sweeping Japan. I hope that doesn't mean AV DVD covers are going to start looking like that!  :-( Dekkappai 22:15, 6 January 2009 (EST)
Hi, Prophecy-- I have a question on this edit at Harumi Nemoto. Did you mean to re-locate the References section up from the bottom? If so, why? I thought we'd agreed References at bottom was to be a BP-standard. Dekkappai 22:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)
I notice you removed the Ja-wiki link in the lead with that edit also. I've been including that as a standard format in the Japanese model articles... Dekkappai 22:51, 6 January 2009 (EST)
Oops. It was Apara. Dekkappai 23:12, 6 January 2009 (EST)

A weighty issue

Hi, Prophecy. I've got an interesting problem here... I've just discovered that two of "my" models are the same person... She used the name Pine Miyazaki when she was a plump-ish big-bust model for Cinema Unit GAS, then she put on some weight and became a full BBW model under the name Yui Kyomoto... So her two infoboxes are the same in many points, but very different in other points-- waist and hip measurements particularly. What to do? I'm going to go ahead and put two separate infoboxes in the merged article, but that looks clunky, and makes the "Alias" field redundant... Any better suggestions? (Incidentally, I find she made quite a few videos under a third name-- whether that involves any significant body changes, I don't know yet.) Dekkappai 00:04, 13 January 2009 (EST)

I've merged the two into her first stage name-- Momoko Okada-- and, again, their are significant physical differences, though she is the same model. Apparently she's been gaining weight throughout her career, beginning in 2004. The gain is reflected in the cup-size also-- from G (Japanese) to J. (And a very pretty girl, thin or fat, in my book :-) Tell me if the article can be tidied up in any way-- looks awfully cluttered to me, with three infoboxes, but I don't know how else to get around this problem. Dekkappai 00:55, 13 January 2009 (EST)
Hi, Prophecy... Well, I'd agree with you normally-- such as with your Lindsay example-- but in this case, the actress is almost making a different "character" for each name/weight change. The data within each name seems to be consistent, but once she has upped her weight, she changes name, character, and the info that goes with it... Yet she is still the same person, so I don't think separate articles on each one would be the answer either... How about making separate sections within the article for each "identity", with each one having its own biobox? Dekkappai 16:40, 13 January 2009 (EST)
Ah... can't relocate the biobox to another section? That will be a problem... I haven't dug into this case enough to be 100% sure, but I suspect I will find that other data does change also... height might stay the same, but birthplace may change, as, obviously, the name does... I'll make this article a research project-- this model has caught my eye in the past, in all three of her incarnations as a pleasing subject for further research :-) -- and I will fill you in on the details once I have found the information... Maybe three separate, inter-linked articles will be the best way to go? Dekkappai 16:48, 13 January 2009 (EST)
I agree, it would be best to be in one article. But it's true, this is an unusual case. She's obviously the same person, but she's creating a different persona for each physical change... Like I say, I'll research her, and think more about it. Once I get more info on the subject I'll ask you, and maybe get the Admins involved too. Got to go now-- cheers! Dekkappai 16:54, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Comparison

Hi Prophecy-- I'm currently editing where I don't have the leisure of doing any image-viewing... Hence, the harmless category-adding and linking edits. I'll check tonight (my night-- morning, or whatever for you-- about six-seven hours from now). Dekkappai 16:31, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I had a look for myself. They seem to have the same eyebrows (which isn't much). But I can't really see any similarities at all. I tried looking for birth marks/moles, but couldn't find any. Apara 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Spam blacklist

I've taken it off the list. The Honorable 18:53, 27 January 2009 (EST)

Bad news

Hi, Prophecy. I see you've been busy at work here. I've been trying to keep up with the Japanese series too-- lots of great stuff going on over there these days :) Horrible news though: My home computer became basically useless last night. The system's all screwed up-- way out of date anyway... I now have no Internet, to say the least. No image capabilities, and probably not even able to do text editing... Also I see they've now disabled image downloading at the public computers I use too... So, I'm going to be, basically, unable to contribute here except for text, and that only very rarely... I'll do what I can to keep up with things until I can get the home computer situation fixed! I'll try to check in as often I can, and keep a record of what's going on with the Japanese videos/actresses. Dekkappai 15:42, 23 March 2009 (EDT)

Jeez, I didn't know you'd take the news so hard! I think I've got the problem fixed now, so work on the Japanese boob community should re-commence tonight or tomorrow. Glad to be back! Dekkappai 16:06, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
No problem-- just kidding above :) The magnificent Mitsumi Nanao caused the trouble-- I was trying to view a video of hers, and downloaded software that screwed up some of my system files. Anyway, now that I've got Internet again, I'll dig back in on Mitsumi! Regards. Dekkappai 22:11, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

Video Company/Studio/Label template?

Hi Prophecy. I noticed your nice manufacturer templates, but couldn't find a similar one for video (or film) studios & labels. I'd like to put a template, or at least the company logo on appropriate pages-- I've started quite a few on Japanese studios & labels. Should I just use the manufacturer template? Or would it be worthwhile to create a new film or video studio template? Dekkappai 18:14, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

OK-- I'll just do the logos for now, but more specific templates are something to think about for future projects. Although I suspect a lot of the general studio information is going to be difficult to find on Japanese subjects. Regards. Dekkappai 18:57, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

The template problem

Hi Prophecy. About the filmography template problem: More and more actress pages load sooo slowly due to the templated filmographies. At Mitsumi Nanao, I'm experimenting with a new format. Just a text filmography in the actress' article, and a link to the "Main filmography" article at the top. Do you think that works? Dekkappai 00:30, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

Good-- I guess I'll start doing that as a standard for filmographies over, maybe ten entries? And the template entries on the actress' main page will be just those in which she is the star. I don't want to get back to putting in those cumbersome tables again, so just a text entry with a link to a full, templated filmography should work. Regards. Dekkappai 10:51, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

removed photos

hi prophecy, the removals were requested by a copyright agent working on behalf of one or more of the photographers. --Hexvoodoo 13:14, 28 April 2009 (EDT)

that agent referred to her by one of her stage names. i assume he searches the internet for all images of her using that stage name. since i have no idea which photographers the agent represents, i don't know whether a photo from a different photographer would trigger another email. it's best to leave that page alone for now. --Hexvoodoo 13:38, 30 April 2009 (EDT)

Template Lists

Do you know how to make template list, like the DanniGirls one? Cost 10:25, 8 May 2009 (EDT) Biobox new

Hi, Prophecy. Cost pointed me to these list templates, which I haven't used yet. I couldn't think of an immediate use for them for my own work, but I have found a site which lists sales rankings (popularity) of busty/BBW models. Maybe this template would work for creating a list/template of their #1 model for each month... One thing though-- the list template itself doesn't seem to have much advantage over just listing the models manually. (Obviously, the template that goes on the model pages does offer an advantage.) But if there would be a way to add a thumbnail photo of the model in the straight lists, as at DanniGirls, I think that would be a significant advantage. Is it possible? Dekkappai 16:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Right now, the DanniGirl templates only go from 2006-2008. I was planning on adding the 2009 models to it. Other list templates, like the playboy and penthouse one can also be updated. Cost 17:12, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
That worked. I'll do some of the other lists as well. I just saw the real penthouse list and it goes up to 1969... I have my work cut out for me. Anyways, by posting on the suggestions page, I'm hoping other volunteers and lurkers will get encouraged to take the initiative to contribute. Hopefully it works.... Cost 17:24, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Hi again, Prophecy. Thanks for the explanation... I'm not sure I follow though. I don't think it was the images that caused the template/server problem. Remember our Uschi filmography test? That one had no images at all-- or maybe just one or two. I don't think it would be necessary at all to make sure that the biobox and the template photos are the same, so there's no need-- at least in my mind-- to make the biobox an all-purpose template. I would think just keeping the list template and adding a photo parameter would do... and wouldn't add much more stress to the server than the list template already has. Or am I not following? Anyway, I'll keep this in mind to try out for that "Top model of the month" list later on. Oh-- and Cost-- Sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you were asking if I knew how to do the template, meaning that I should give it a try-- I didn't realize you were asking for advice. But I've never used it anyway, so Prophecy is the right guy to ask :-) Cheers! Dekkappai 03:28, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

Biobox new

Hi Prophecy, I am trying to use the Biobox new template in another wiki. I am using all the related templates as well as the monobook and common.css configuration. But I'm facing a problem. In the performances section even if i leave these fields empty the keywords continue appearing (Topless, Bush, Full frontal, Pink, Masturbation, Dildo, Fisting, etc.) and the categories are also being added at the bottom. It's a brilliant template. I want to use it and properly attribute it to Boobpedia. Do you have any idea why is this happening? Thank you in advance--Yorgos 11:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Hi Prophecy, thank you for your kindness and your offer to help me. What I've seen (after testing) is that the template is working fine in MediaWiki 1.13.3 (or earlier) but it won't work in 1.14. Can you think of a quick fix for that or maybe guide me towards a solution? Thank you again. Have a nice day! --Yorgos 03:37, 12 May 2009 (EDT)
I have further problems of compatibility between the template and Mediawiki's version :(
Look this, for example
Let me check the issue and I'll call you back. Many thanks! --Yorgos 06:30, 13 May 2009 (EDT)
Hi Prophecy, any news about the issue on Biobox new? Thanx. --Yorgos 04:57, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

Tattoo category?

Hey Prophecy, long time, no talk.

I wanted to ask your opinnion on a category of women here on Boobpedia with tattoos. You think this would be relevant or a waste of server space? Apara 02:58, 13 May 2009 (EDT)

Thanks for the feedback, I was thinking the same as you were. Apara 01:47, 15 May 2009 (EDT)

Fair use images

Hi. Under the terms of fair use images, they should only be used within articles. Therefore please could you remove any fair use images on your user page. Thanks. Boobs Online 18:16, 31 December 2012 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://www.boobpedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Prophecy&oldid=300672"