User talk:Prophecy

• Main talk page
• Archive 1 from 2008-04-12 to 2008-08-05
• Archive 2 from 2008-08-05 to 2008-12-07

Fishnets

I've been noticing the uploading of fishnet clothing pictures. Some pin up article have pictures of them in fishnets. Lorraine Burnett and Marge Mellor, come to mind.Apara 23:10, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Oh ok, well if you needed more, then you know where to look....Apara 23:27, 9 December 2008 (EST)

Movie Pages

For a few of the articles, I want to mention that the performer performed in the infamous pardory Who's Naylin' Paylin?. How do you make those pages? Cost 18:37, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Yes. I forgot to add that... Cost 18:42, 10 December 2008 (EST)

Booble Girls

A request has been made for a DanniGirls-type template for :Category:Booble Cover Girls, if you're interested (and don't have any other projects you're working on :) ) The Honorable 22:09, 15 December 2008 (EST)

Supporting Actresses and Sequels

What do we do with supporting actresses? Should we include them in the template or just the article? The two films that have this are Pirates and Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge.

The latter is also the sequel to the former. Should I put it type=episode in the template for them?

Cost 13:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Yeah, that's what I was planning on doing too. Cost 02:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)

Since you started the article

You probably have something to say, Talk:Madonna. Apara 03:07, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Micro Tits Ciccone

Sure, but she has not looked like the black and white photo for almost 25 years, the new photo is what she looks like. Madonna is NOT a C and barely ever was, in her early days she was virtually flat chested. I have sent pics to an editor to show you what I mean. Cone bras does not a bust make. My text is very relevant to boobpedia so I'm disappointed that is deleted. The article reads like a madonna fan cut and paste-this is a site about big boobs not over hyped ones. Also anyone who would use Lynsey in the same sentence madonna does not know their boobs. madonna needs to be compared to smaller women. Just an opinion. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Why was the picture deleted? That is WHAT SHE LOOKS LIKE. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, it's breastking, I responded to you on the madonna page. i wrote most of Russ Meyer's wikipedia page btw. Madonna is the Anti-Super Vixen in every way shape and especially form! Best WishesBreastKing 07:20, 5 January 2009 (EST)

I responded again on the Mandonna page.Regarding my great article on Russ Meyer from wikipedia, you are extremely incorrect and lying as there are tons of notations and citations on my wikipedia article, THAT I PUT IN, that's why I was awarded my Barn Star for it as it was only two paragraphs when I got there.Perhaps you are not clear as to what my wikipedia name is? I also wrote most of the other Russ Meyer related pages correcting mistakes.

Happy New Year

Happy New Year to you too, Prophecy! I don't know if you've noticed, but we received some big news for Fuko on the new year-- She's going all-out AV. (Personally, I'd prefer just nude-posing, but I'll take AV without complaint if it comes to that ;) About other editors, yes, I see what you mean... I haven't followed what this is all about, but there was a certain editor at WP involved in the Russ Meyer page who was also changing Fuko's measurements at random, calling them "real" measurements, but based on pure guess-work... I hope this sort of bat-shittery isn't coming over here... One of WP's bad habits is carrying assumptions of good faith beyond the breaking point for disruptive users, while being unnecessarily harsh on good contributors. I trust BP's administrators will not fall into that trap though :) Looking forward to another year of good work with you. Cheers! Dekkappai 09:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)

I fear it's getting even worse than pixels. You notice the stars over her nipples on the video cover, I assume? There's a new wave of censorship sweeping Japan. I hope that doesn't mean AV DVD covers are going to start looking like that!  :-( Dekkappai 22:15, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, Prophecy-- I have a question on this edit at Harumi Nemoto. Did you mean to re-locate the References section up from the bottom? If so, why? I thought we'd agreed References at bottom was to be a BP-standard. Dekkappai 22:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)

I notice you removed the Ja-wiki link in the lead with that edit also. I've been including that as a standard format in the Japanese model articles... Dekkappai 22:51, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Oops. It was Apara. Dekkappai 23:12, 6 January 2009 (EST)

A weighty issue

Hi, Prophecy. I've got an interesting problem here... I've just discovered that two of "my" models are the same person... She used the name Pine Miyazaki when she was a plump-ish big-bust model for Cinema Unit GAS, then she put on some weight and became a full BBW model under the name Yui Kyomoto... So her two infoboxes are the same in many points, but very different in other points-- waist and hip measurements particularly. What to do? I'm going to go ahead and put two separate infoboxes in the merged article, but that looks clunky, and makes the "Alias" field redundant... Any better suggestions? (Incidentally, I find she made quite a few videos under a third name-- whether that involves any significant body changes, I don't know yet.) Dekkappai 00:04, 13 January 2009 (EST)

I've merged the two into her first stage name-- Momoko Okada-- and, again, their are significant physical differences, though she is the same model. Apparently she's been gaining weight throughout her career, beginning in 2004. The gain is reflected in the cup-size also-- from G (Japanese) to J. (And a very pretty girl, thin or fat, in my book :-) Tell me if the article can be tidied up in any way-- looks awfully cluttered to me, with three infoboxes, but I don't know how else to get around this problem. Dekkappai 00:55, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, Prophecy... Well, I'd agree with you normally-- such as with your Lindsay example-- but in this case, the actress is almost making a different "character" for each name/weight change. The data within each name seems to be consistent, but once she has upped her weight, she changes name, character, and the info that goes with it... Yet she is still the same person, so I don't think separate articles on each one would be the answer either... How about making separate sections within the article for each "identity", with each one having its own biobox? Dekkappai 16:40, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Ah... can't relocate the biobox to another section? That will be a problem... I haven't dug into this case enough to be 100% sure, but I suspect I will find that other data does change also... height might stay the same, but birthplace may change, as, obviously, the name does... I'll make this article a research project-- this model has caught my eye in the past, in all three of her incarnations as a pleasing subject for further research :-) -- and I will fill you in on the details once I have found the information... Maybe three separate, inter-linked articles will be the best way to go? Dekkappai 16:48, 13 January 2009 (EST)

I agree, it would be best to be in one article. But it's true, this is an unusual case. She's obviously the same person, but she's creating a different persona for each physical change... Like I say, I'll research her, and think more about it. Once I get more info on the subject I'll ask you, and maybe get the Admins involved too. Got to go now-- cheers! Dekkappai 16:54, 13 January 2009 (EST)

Comparison

Hi Prophecy-- I'm currently editing where I don't have the leisure of doing any image-viewing... Hence, the harmless category-adding and linking edits. I'll check tonight (my night-- morning, or whatever for you-- about six-seven hours from now). Dekkappai 16:31, 15 January 2009 (EST)

I had a look for myself. They seem to have the same eyebrows (which isn't much). But I can't really see any similarities at all. I tried looking for birth marks/moles, but couldn't find any. Apara 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)

Spam blacklist

I've taken it off the list. The Honorable 18:53, 27 January 2009 (EST)

Bad news

Hi, Prophecy. I see you've been busy at work here. I've been trying to keep up with the Japanese series too-- lots of great stuff going on over there these days :) Horrible news though: My home computer became basically useless last night. The system's all screwed up-- way out of date anyway... I now have no Internet, to say the least. No image capabilities, and probably not even able to do text editing... Also I see they've now disabled image downloading at the public computers I use too... So, I'm going to be, basically, unable to contribute here except for text, and that only very rarely... I'll do what I can to keep up with things until I can get the home computer situation fixed! I'll try to check in as often I can, and keep a record of what's going on with the Japanese videos/actresses. Dekkappai 15:42, 23 March 2009 (EDT)

Jeez, I didn't know you'd take the news so hard! I think I've got the problem fixed now, so work on the Japanese boob community should re-commence tonight or tomorrow. Glad to be back! Dekkappai 16:06, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

No problem-- just kidding above :) The magnificent Mitsumi Nanao caused the trouble-- I was trying to view a video of hers, and downloaded software that screwed up some of my system files. Anyway, now that I've got Internet again, I'll dig back in on Mitsumi! Regards. Dekkappai 22:11, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

Video Company/Studio/Label template?

Hi Prophecy. I noticed your nice manufacturer templates, but couldn't find a similar one for video (or film) studios & labels. I'd like to put a template, or at least the company logo on appropriate pages-- I've started quite a few on Japanese studios & labels. Should I just use the manufacturer template? Or would it be worthwhile to create a new film or video studio template? Dekkappai 18:14, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

OK-- I'll just do the logos for now, but more specific templates are something to think about for future projects. Although I suspect a lot of the general studio information is going to be difficult to find on Japanese subjects. Regards. Dekkappai 18:57, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

The template problem

Hi Prophecy. About the filmography template problem: More and more actress pages load sooo slowly due to the templated filmographies. At Mitsumi Nanao, I'm experimenting with a new format. Just a text filmography in the actress' article, and a link to the "Main filmography" article at the top. Do you think that works? Dekkappai 00:30, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

Good-- I guess I'll start doing that as a standard for filmographies over, maybe ten entries? And the template entries on the actress' main page will be just those in which she is the star. I don't want to get back to putting in those cumbersome tables again, so just a text entry with a link to a full, templated filmography should work. Regards. Dekkappai 10:51, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

removed photos

hi prophecy, the removals were requested by a copyright agent working on behalf of one or more of the photographers. --Hexvoodoo 13:14, 28 April 2009 (EDT)

that agent referred to her by one of her stage names. i assume he searches the internet for all images of her using that stage name. since i have no idea which photographers the agent represents, i don't know whether a photo from a different photographer would trigger another email. it's best to leave that page alone for now. --Hexvoodoo 13:38, 30 April 2009 (EDT)

Template Lists

Do you know how to make template list, like the DanniGirls one? Cost 10:25, 8 May 2009 (EDT) Biobox new

Hi, Prophecy. Cost pointed me to these list templates, which I haven't used yet. I couldn't think of an immediate use for them for my own work, but I have found a site which lists sales rankings (popularity) of busty/BBW models. Maybe this template would work for creating a list/template of their #1 model for each month... One thing though-- the list template itself doesn't seem to have much advantage over just listing the models manually. (Obviously, the template that goes on the model pages does offer an advantage.) But if there would be a way to add a thumbnail photo of the model in the straight lists, as at DanniGirls, I think that would be a significant advantage. Is it possible? Dekkappai 16:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)

Right now, the DanniGirl templates only go from 2006-2008. I was planning on adding the 2009 models to it. Other list templates, like the playboy and penthouse one can also be updated. Cost 17:12, 8 May 2009 (EDT)

That worked. I'll do some of the other lists as well. I just saw the real penthouse list and it goes up to 1969... I have my work cut out for me. Anyways, by posting on the suggestions page, I'm hoping other volunteers and lurkers will get encouraged to take the initiative to contribute. Hopefully it works.... Cost 17:24, 8 May 2009 (EDT)

Hi again, Prophecy. Thanks for the explanation... I'm not sure I follow though. I don't think it was the images that caused the template/server problem. Remember our Uschi filmography test? That one had no images at all-- or maybe just one or two. I don't think it would be necessary at all to make sure that the biobox and the template photos are the same, so there's no need-- at least in my mind-- to make the biobox an all-purpose template. I would think just keeping the list template and adding a photo parameter would do... and wouldn't add much more stress to the server than the list template already has. Or am I not following? Anyway, I'll keep this in mind to try out for that "Top model of the month" list later on. Oh-- and Cost-- Sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you were asking if I knew how to do the template, meaning that I should give it a try-- I didn't realize you were asking for advice. But I've never used it anyway, so Prophecy is the right guy to ask :-) Cheers! Dekkappai 03:28, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

Biobox new

Hi Prophecy, I am trying to use the Biobox new template in another wiki. I am using all the related templates as well as the monobook and common.css configuration. But I'm facing a problem. In the performances section even if i leave these fields empty the keywords continue appearing (Topless, Bush, Full frontal, Pink, Masturbation, Dildo, Fisting, etc.) and the categories are also being added at the bottom. It's a brilliant template. I want to use it and properly attribute it to Boobpedia. Do you have any idea why is this happening? Thank you in advance--Yorgos 11:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Hi Prophecy, thank you for your kindness and your offer to help me. What I've seen (after testing) is that the template is working fine in MediaWiki 1.13.3 (or earlier) but it won't work in 1.14. Can you think of a quick fix for that or maybe guide me towards a solution? Thank you again. Have a nice day! --Yorgos 03:37, 12 May 2009 (EDT)
I have further problems of compatibility between the template and Mediawiki's version :(
Look this, for example
Let me check the issue and I'll call you back. Many thanks! --Yorgos 06:30, 13 May 2009 (EDT)
Hi Prophecy, any news about the issue on Biobox new? Thanx. --Yorgos 04:57, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

Tattoo category?

Hey Prophecy, long time, no talk.

I wanted to ask your opinnion on a category of women here on Boobpedia with tattoos. You think this would be relevant or a waste of server space? Apara 02:58, 13 May 2009 (EDT)

Thanks for the feedback, I was thinking the same as you were. Apara 01:47, 15 May 2009 (EDT)

Fair use images

Hi. Under the terms of fair use images, they should only be used within articles. Therefore please could you remove any fair use images on your user page. Thanks. Boobs Online 18:16, 31 December 2012 (EST)