User talk:Biguns

About the change in the Orit Fux article.

Hi Biguns!, well with regard to change done in the article about Orit Fux, really there is not sense, only i believed would be just that being I the article creator, I would have the right to elect the photo, in fact, I almost don't make changes in articles that I did not write, only to correct some erroneous data, style or format, i expect your comprehension, and i don't want to enter in conflict with anybody for anything, I'm here only to share our great passion for the BIG BOOBS.

Greetings and Blessings. Kamui99 03:33, 22 January 2008 (EST)

Diana / disambiguation

I've been thinking about how disambiguation should be handled here. For women with the same first name, but different full names (like the Diana page), not having a Diana page at all is probably best. That way, someone searching for Diana will get the search results for "Diana." For women with the same name (like Samantha Fox), I think a disambiguation page should be used.

If you have any other ideas or thoughts on this, by all means let me know. :) The Honorable 12:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)

I actually think you're right. But since the Diana article already existed, I thought I might as well do something with it and let you decide if you want to delete it or not.

Nevertheless, what about a category for disambiguation pages? -Biguns 12:46, 7 March 2008 (EST)

Good idea. I've made Category:Disambiguation and put the ones I could find in it. The Honorable 00:25, 8 March 2008 (EST)

The "Big tit movies / pictures of..."

Re: your note on Alessandra Derya: the affiliate links section isn't really for admins-only section. If you know someone has been in, say, Score, and {{scoreland}} hasn't been added, you (or anyone) is welcome to add it. :) The Honorable 13:23, 16 March 2008 (EDT)

"Vandalism"

Just a note -- "vandalism" should only be used to describe an article being deliberately defaced, not well-intentioned fixes that you may disagree with. :) The Honorable 20:43, 24 March 2008 (EDT)

Like deliberately removing a main image without even bothering to explain? -Biguns 09:00, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

I hadn't noticed that when I posted my original message. I still wouldn't call it vandalism, but, yeah, that's not cool. The Honorable 20:55, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

Well, there's vandalism by addition and vandalism by subtraction. The former may stick out more (because it uses curse words and such), but in essence their affects are really the same. They're both vandalism. -Biguns 05:43, 26 March 2008 (EDT)

Markéta Pechová / Marketa Pechova

I've moved Markéta Pechová back to Marketa Pechova -- Hexvoodoo has said that he prefers no special characters in article titles. (Unfortunately, I can't remember where he said it... :) The Honorable 17:43, 30 March 2008 (EDT)

Sure. If I had known about this rule (although it has no need in Mediawiki), I wouldn't have done the move. -Biguns 18:37, 30 March 2008 (EDT)

No problem; even though you didn't know, your intentions were obviously good. I think it's mainly for the benefit of search engines, and because we've had a few pages that were difficult to move/delete because of unusual characters. The Honorable 18:49, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

Spam

Biguns, please learn the meaning of the term "Spam" before applying it to inter-BP links. The links you removed from Rumi Akutsu were to potential, and planned BP articles. Thank you. Dekkappai 12:58, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

If that is not spam (plus vandalism by omission), I don't know what is. It's just a random link to one of her videos, that gives you % for each sale that comes through this link. If I wanted to, don't you think I could add such links to each and every article in this site with my seller's ID in them? -Biguns 14:03, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

A couple of points, Biguns

1. If you are seriously calling THIS edit "Vandalism by omission" [sic], take a look at how many inter-BP links have been restored after you removed them. I count 15 intentional "Vandalism by omission"s [sic] by you to my accidental two, which occurred while reverting yours. ("Topless=yes", "large areolas" Gee, I think we could have figured this out without even translation from the Japanese.)
2. I don't for a minute believe you seriously do consider my reversion "Vanadlism by omission" [sic], but rather that you wanted to "get back" at me for taking exception to your removal of red links, and so you went whining to the Admin-on-duty. In other words, you were being an asshole, and, with all due respect, for the sake of BP and good will among your fellow editors, I recommend that you not continue to behave in an asshole-like manner.
3. Both The Honorable and Hexvoodoo have encouraged the uploading of video/DVD covers to add information and images to articles. This makes perfect sense in the format of a filmography, which can provide information such as date of release, etc., instead of bare images. Filmographies need sourcing which can provide verification-- how else do we know if anonymous editors are just pulling titles and dates out their arses? Sourcing is good, it is not Spam. If you are against providing filmographies/video covers, and links to their verification here at BP, may I ask-- what are you doing here? If you prefer to remove information that has been contributed by others, perhaps Wikipedia is where you belong.
4. You accuse me of getting a percentage of sales that come through this site. To my knowledge, most Japanese online sites, dmm.co.jp included, do not take foreign orders. And regardless, if you were around when BP was starting up, you might have seen Hexvoodoo actually encourage commercial links.
5. What you call a "random link to one of her videos" is a link to dmm.co.jp, a Japanese consortium of adult-video companies. The links to this site provide catalogue numbers and other information on the video which is supplied by the makers of the videos themselves, not by a "random" retail site.
6. Because these subjects are in Japanese, searching for information will be difficult for most users of Boobpedia, that is why links to the specific video page is valuable. Not only can the data be confirmed, and further information/review/description be obtained (if one reads Japanese), screen-caps of the video itself are provided.
7. Finally, and most importantly, until you become an Admin-- and I don't see that happening soon-- I encourage you strongly to focus more on your own contributions than on wasting the time of other editors by pestering them over the minutiae of editing-style and false accusations of bad-faith editing.

Regards, Dekkappai 19:15, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

It's funny the only one here who has to resort to curses is the one who blames others of personal agendas. Besides, you're a demagogue. Vandalism by omission is just that (e.g. removing stats and categories without even bothering to mention why). Also, I removed your sales' link, not your covers. What does it have to do with covers? Maybe Wikipedia's rules bother you, but you do realize this site has rules too (that were not set by yours truly), right? Have you read the help and FAQ pages? -Biguns 20:23, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

Publicity photos/paparazzi photos

When you say "publicity photos," I think you mean "paparazzi photos." Publicity photos usually refers to posed studio photos, not photos taken outside movie premieres and events. The Honorable 20:36, 1 May 2008 (EDT)