User talk:Biguns

About the change in the Orit Fux article.

Hi Biguns!, well with regard to change done in the article about Orit Fux, really there is not sense, only i believed would be just that being I the article creator, I would have the right to elect the photo, in fact, I almost don't make changes in articles that I did not write, only to correct some erroneous data, style or format, i expect your comprehension, and i don't want to enter in conflict with anybody for anything, I'm here only to share our great passion for the BIG BOOBS.

Greetings and Blessings. Kamui99 03:33, 22 January 2008 (EST)

Diana / disambiguation

I've been thinking about how disambiguation should be handled here. For women with the same first name, but different full names (like the Diana page), not having a Diana page at all is probably best. That way, someone searching for Diana will get the search results for "Diana." For women with the same name (like Samantha Fox), I think a disambiguation page should be used.

If you have any other ideas or thoughts on this, by all means let me know. :) The Honorable 12:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)

I actually think you're right. But since the Diana article already existed, I thought I might as well do something with it and let you decide if you want to delete it or not.

Nevertheless, what about a category for disambiguation pages? -Biguns 12:46, 7 March 2008 (EST)

Good idea. I've made Category:Disambiguation and put the ones I could find in it. The Honorable 00:25, 8 March 2008 (EST)

The "Big tit movies / pictures of..."

Re: your note on Alessandra Derya: the affiliate links section isn't really for admins-only section. If you know someone has been in, say, Score, and {{scoreland}} hasn't been added, you (or anyone) is welcome to add it. :) The Honorable 13:23, 16 March 2008 (EDT)

"Vandalism"

Just a note -- "vandalism" should only be used to describe an article being deliberately defaced, not well-intentioned fixes that you may disagree with. :) The Honorable 20:43, 24 March 2008 (EDT)

Like deliberately removing a main image without even bothering to explain? -Biguns 09:00, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

I hadn't noticed that when I posted my original message. I still wouldn't call it vandalism, but, yeah, that's not cool. The Honorable 20:55, 25 March 2008 (EDT)