Talk:Fuko

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Revision as of 00:36, 19 October 2007 by Hexvoodoo (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 130.13.221.222 (Talk); changed back to last version by Dekkappai)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

I'm having trouble believing she has posed topless. Is there any proof? :-) NiceGuysFavoriteJuggs 15:15, 5 March 2007 (PST .

Well, take a look at this. Enjoy. Please remove this copyrighted picture after viewing. --Flaxapa 04:07, 6 March 2007 (PST)

Absolutely awesome! I have never been so happy to be wrong in my life! Thank you!:-D NiceGuysFavoriteJuggs 17:28, 6 March 2007 (PST)
You are welcome, buddy. She is one of natures marvels. --Flaxapa 02:04, 7 March 2007 (PST)

The great body-type controversy

The body-type field seems awfully subjective to me, but, thankfully, this isn't a site which wastes time arguing over whether things are strictly... ahem... "encyclopedic" or "notable." It's nothing I'd propose an edit war over either. Maybe we can reach a consensus. This model looks thin to me-- except, quite obviously, in the upper regions. I notice she's got a bit of a pot belly, but that hardly makes her "chubby" in my book. "Chubby" brings to mind well-filled-out models like Mariko Morikawa or maybe even Kimiko Matsuzaka. Am I in a minority here? Should we have a vote over what body-type to classify Fuko under? I say she's pretty thin basically, with a little tummy, and an enormous top. Dekkappai 09:45, 14 April 2007 (PDT)