User talk:Dekkappai

(Archive 1: Feb-Aug 2008: Return to BP, Prophecy begins Filmography dev't)
(Archive 2: Aug 2008: Finish Film template discussion)

Question

...to a native speaker: Let's assume a model has worn man different bras. And let's assume every bra of hers has an article on Boobpedia. How would you call a list of her bras in her article? Braography?

Ah, no, that doesn't work. There may be bodies and other clothing included. I think there isn't a nice neologism we could find for that?

Prophecy 23:20, 4 August 2008 (EDT

You mean her birth year? Yes, it's linked automatically by the biobox. Prophecy 23:40, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

ofseries is actually meant only for episodes of TV serials for example. But it can also be used for Boku no Oppai. It appears in GOLU-09, too, after the type at the top of the infobox parameters: Video (Boku no Oppai). It is not necessary to have it in a filmography line though I think. It should be sufficient if you have all the title data, company and ID. Prophecy 00:14, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Hm... Perhaps not a bad idea. By the way, the notes column will be filled with those affiliate links and view on demand and stuff... On pages like Lucy Love, for example. I'll think about it. Prophecy 04:22, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

• You may be right about the Notes field. I do not like the affiliate links either. I do not like the "Big tits pictures / movies of" section. It's irritating and misleading. When I was a simple Boobpedia visitor, I never clicked on those links, because I learned after the first trial that it was only affiliate links NOT leading to the promised big tits pictures / movies of the model I was reading the article of. So this section was even contraproductive. Besides, the spaces around the / are wrong and bad typography. I removed the big tits pictures / movies section in every single of my articles. I have a list of websites the model worked with, this is honest, because it says: This is the website the model appears on. I put the affiliate links in there, because I do understand that Boobpedia needs this. I guess there aren't many donors. Boobpedia has to live somehow.
• But back to our Notes column: Installing an extra column for affiliate links is more than I want to grant. Besides, the filmography table cannot take more columns. Even now you said that some columns are squeezed if you view them with a low screen resolution. So I thought the best way to make it possible to include them when needed was to put them into the notes field. Remember: You are not obliged to put any affiliate links there. But I saw it in many of the "standard" pornstars pages like Lucy Love that VOD links have been added after a quite a few films by the admins. And this is ok. If a visitor wants to view scenes of the film, he can; and why not have the site pay Boobpedia for leading visitors to their VOD site. And: Especially the Lucy Love filmography is edited constantly, some editors thoroughly collect the films she participated in. If we want our clean and fancy filmography style to be used there, we have to offer the possibility to add the affiliate links. Besides, on Anna Semenovich#Cinema, I used the column for adding the role she was playing in the film (because I did not want an extra column for this either) and the IMDb link. I think we should just consider it as a multipurpose field where users can put things they'd like to appear in the filmography, but which don't have a field elsewhere.
• Different thing: Apparently yuo copied the data from {{Beneath the Valley of the Ultravixens}} to {{Up!}} without changing all parameters. :-) Now both films have partly the same data.
• Please archive this talk page too, except this last section. It has become huge just in a few days, but I think most work is done. It's difficult to load, therefore I removed the example filmography of Russ Meyer from this page too. Prophecy 14:05, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Ok, look Faster Pussycat up in the print source, and compare with other sources if possible. If you change it back to 1966, please be sure to change the year in August 6, too! August 6 appears on the Boobpedia Main page tomorrow, in the right box, as "Today in boob history" (appears if a page for the day exists). So it would be nice if we were correct. :-) Prophecy 15:28, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Need help

Hi Dekkappai,

could you have a look at Tango II (bra)? It's my first bra article which is not only a stub - but I'm not quite satisfied with my grammatical and rhetoric style, above all in the "Reception" section. Perhaps you as a native speaker may go through the article and make suggestions if the wording or style appears strange to you. Feel free to edit.

Thanks in advance

Prophecy 09:21, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Ah, and one more question: "Reception" means how people like it, but I'm also looking for a section title like "circulation", "speading", "diffusion" containing facts about who wears a bra. Some bras are very widespread among Score models, but do not appear in other pictorials at all. Some are only worn by European models, and some are really spread all over the world. Any suggestions? Prophecy 09:34, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for now, I'll go through your changes later, have to leave for a while. Looking forward to your suggestion concerning the "circulation" of a bra. :-) Prophecy 09:36, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Ah! Distribution? Or can this be confused with distributors selling it in different countries? Prophecy 10:26, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Thanks! :-) About models who wear: No, that doesn't work. I already have a list like this in the infobox. I meant it more in a general way. It seems for example that Score has bought some bras and garments for their models which they give to them at each and every occasion (I hope they wash them in the meantime), but no one else has been seen wearing them. Strange... The wearers can be classified not only by model, but also by geographic boundaries (ok, certainly a pure British bra is worn mostly in Britain), and, as I said, by websites. I thought distribution was possible, analog to Gauss distribution and stuff... :-( Prophecy 13:25, 6 August 2008 (EDT)