Talk:Rosina Revelle: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Citations: first disagreement)
Line 5: Line 5:
:: So we have no prove that she started in 1954? I could not find it in the references. [[User:Prophecy|Prophecy]] 01:06, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
:: So we have no prove that she started in 1954? I could not find it in the references. [[User:Prophecy|Prophecy]] 01:06, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
:::[http://web.archive.org/web/20040930005921/http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/60sglamdatabase/RR.htm THE 60sGLAM DATABASE OF BRITISH GLAMOUR MODELS OF THE 1960S] says "From late 1956 To 1959" and speculates she was 16 when she began modeling. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 01:12, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
:::[http://web.archive.org/web/20040930005921/http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/60sglamdatabase/RR.htm THE 60sGLAM DATABASE OF BRITISH GLAMOUR MODELS OF THE 1960S] says "From late 1956 To 1959" and speculates she was 16 when she began modeling. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 01:12, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
==Citations==
Well, here we have a disagreement: I think those bare URL / name citations look terrible. We should either use the templates, or have them in such a format that they provide the info a template gives. We're trying to improve this, after all, aren't we? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 01:15, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:15, 3 September 2008

Years active

The biobox says she started in 1954, but the article text mentions 1957. Which year is better? Are there sources? Prophecy 00:43, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

1957 was when she worked with Russell Gay and appeared in QT magazine. Apara 00:54, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
So we have no prove that she started in 1954? I could not find it in the references. Prophecy 01:06, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
THE 60sGLAM DATABASE OF BRITISH GLAMOUR MODELS OF THE 1960S says "From late 1956 To 1959" and speculates she was 16 when she began modeling. Dekkappai 01:12, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

Citations

Well, here we have a disagreement: I think those bare URL / name citations look terrible. We should either use the templates, or have them in such a format that they provide the info a template gives. We're trying to improve this, after all, aren't we? Dekkappai 01:15, 3 September 2008 (EDT)