Talk:Andrea Rincon: Difference between revisions
Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Is 1986 correct? Because her official website says she's 18 years old. I haven't bothered to change it back because I know for a fact that many tend to "lie" by advertizing "barely legal ...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is 1986 correct? Because her official website says she's 18 years old. | Is 1986 correct? Because her official website says she's 18 years old. | ||
I haven't bothered to change it back because I know for a fact that many tend to "lie" by advertizing "barely legal age" in order to be more apetizing to the male genre. A good way to sort this out might be by having a proof showing her doing nude as far as we can find, thus proving the youngest possible she can be. | I haven't bothered to change it back because I know for a fact that many tend to "lie" by advertizing "barely legal age" in order to be more apetizing to the male genre. A good way to sort this out might be by having a proof showing her doing nude as far as we can find, thus proving the youngest possible she can be.--[[User:Jeremfg|Jeremfg]] 15:27, 28 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 28 June 2008
Is 1986 correct? Because her official website says she's 18 years old.
I haven't bothered to change it back because I know for a fact that many tend to "lie" by advertizing "barely legal age" in order to be more apetizing to the male genre. A good way to sort this out might be by having a proof showing her doing nude as far as we can find, thus proving the youngest possible she can be.--Jeremfg 15:27, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
