Talk:Aria Valentino

Natural or silicone?

Doesn't this section belong here in the talk page rather than in the article? -Biguns 20:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Hm... I made this analogically to Anna Semenovich. Every time there's a doubt I write it down. But there's a difference I see now: In Anna's case, there is a source that doubts that her breasts are real. In Aria's case, it's me who says this.

I read this kind in many other articles that only put the facts together and let the reader decide. That's why I posted pictures where the "scars" are relatively clear. I don't know... I thought Boobpedia should not just adopt anything that official websites write (above all when it's Big Tits Curvy Asses who are behind that site), but be critical where appropriate. At least point the reader's attention to facts.

Concerning the word "now": You are right, I took it from her website, but "now" can be wrong tomorrow. But what about "currently lives in..." That's stated in many many articles. This would be as wrong as "now" if the model moves again. Or is there another reason why "now" is not good? Sometimes I do not detect slight nuances in the meaning of English words.

Concerning "large areolas": I already noticed that I often forget this category and that you seem to like them, because you add the category very often. As for Aria, I think these are really not large, they are really normal. If every model gets this category, what's left for "normal" or "small" areolas? Just my opinion...

Suggestion: You concede the silicone chapter and the line break to me and I concede the large areolas to you? :-)

Regards

Prophecy 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)