User talk:Biguns: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
If you have any other ideas or thoughts on this, by all means let me know. :) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 12:43, 7 March 2008 (EST) | If you have any other ideas or thoughts on this, by all means let me know. :) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 12:43, 7 March 2008 (EST) | ||
: I actually think you're right. But since the Diana article already existed, I thought I might as well do something with it and let you decide if you want to delete it or not. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 12:46, 7 March 2008 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 17:46, 7 March 2008
About the change in the Orit Fux article.
Hi Biguns!, well with regard to change done in the article about Orit Fux, really there is not sense, only i believed would be just that being I the article creator, I would have the right to elect the photo, in fact, I almost don't make changes in articles that I did not write, only to correct some erroneous data, style or format, i expect your comprehension, and i don't want to enter in conflict with anybody for anything, I'm here only to share our great passion for the BIG BOOBS.
Greetings and Blessings. Kamui99 03:33, 22 January 2008 (EST)
Diana / disambiguation
I've been thinking about how disambiguation should be handled here. For women with the same first name, but different full names (like the Diana page), not having a Diana page at all is probably best. That way, someone searching for Diana will get the search results for "Diana." For women with the same name (like Samantha Fox), I think a disambiguation page should be used.
If you have any other ideas or thoughts on this, by all means let me know. :) The Honorable 12:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- I actually think you're right. But since the Diana article already existed, I thought I might as well do something with it and let you decide if you want to delete it or not. -Biguns 12:46, 7 March 2008 (EST)
