User talk:Kikodawgzzz: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(Undo revision 371858 by Kikodawgzzz (talk))
Line 5: Line 5:
:[[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]], I respect that you are trying to protect people, but the stark reality is that these facts are publicly known amongst anyone on the internet who has bothered to look (I'll confess I'm an internet junkie, but that doesn't make this any less true in this case). The biggest problem I have with you as an admin is that you unilaterally remove edits like mine without discussion. Admins are admins, but they are also users and like other wiki users, admins have an inherent responsibility to discuss any changes, including any reverts. In fact, rather than reverting, your policy is to completely delete an edit you don't like. That's not how a wiki is supposed to operate. Also, you don't have a Terms of Service wherein you state that edits like mine are not permissible. You would need a clearly-defined set of rules for this wiki, including the rule that edits like mine are not permissible, in order to be justified in continuing to unilaterally delete them. And that set of rules would have to be endorsed by all admins across the entire wiki. It's a dictatorship otherwise. [[User:Kikodawgzzz|Kikodawgzzz]] 11:47, 3 October 2013 (EDT)
:[[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]], I respect that you are trying to protect people, but the stark reality is that these facts are publicly known amongst anyone on the internet who has bothered to look (I'll confess I'm an internet junkie, but that doesn't make this any less true in this case). The biggest problem I have with you as an admin is that you unilaterally remove edits like mine without discussion. Admins are admins, but they are also users and like other wiki users, admins have an inherent responsibility to discuss any changes, including any reverts. In fact, rather than reverting, your policy is to completely delete an edit you don't like. That's not how a wiki is supposed to operate. Also, you don't have a Terms of Service wherein you state that edits like mine are not permissible. You would need a clearly-defined set of rules for this wiki, including the rule that edits like mine are not permissible, in order to be justified in continuing to unilaterally delete them. And that set of rules would have to be endorsed by all admins across the entire wiki. It's a dictatorship otherwise. [[User:Kikodawgzzz|Kikodawgzzz]] 11:47, 3 October 2013 (EDT)
:: After a bit of investigation, I've reinstated your edits, though I don't think that autograph site proves that Samantha Paige is her "real" name. Sorry for jumping to conclusions, but I'd rather err on the side of protecting privacy. (After all, there are reasons why we're not using our real names here. :) ) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 17:46, 3 October 2013 (EDT)
:: After a bit of investigation, I've reinstated your edits, though I don't think that autograph site proves that Samantha Paige is her "real" name. Sorry for jumping to conclusions, but I'd rather err on the side of protecting privacy. (After all, there are reasons why we're not using our real names here. :) ) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 17:46, 3 October 2013 (EDT)
::::[[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]], I have now discovered [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ellie+jaycock&safe=off&client=firefox-beta&hs=r7M&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=fflb&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=xOugUp3iO8Su7AbjwIHQBA&ved=0CC8QsAQ&biw=1440&bih=771#channel=fflb&q=ellie%20jaycock%202013&revid=325272622&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&safe=off&tbm=isch Ellie Jaycock], who is apparently British and has 32K boobs but looks even bigger than that (and seems especially popular with Venezuelans and other hispanophone countries). I do not know whether Ellie officially outdoes Rachel Aldana as the world's biggest slim-and-stacked publicly-known female, but just from looking at her pictures, I see no reason not to presume she could easily trounce Rachel for the title. She's even bigger than the early Ashley Sage Ellison and as you know, that's saying something. Ellie also appears to be both slimmer and bigger than Dors Feline when Dors was a K cup, and that's saying something too. Ellie has been in the Huffington Post and other articles where, similar to Dors Feline, she 'complains' about how her boobs are 'ruining her life' while at exactly the same time, very plainly-hypocritically, she's holding and modelling her enormous chest in every single photo and smiling in every single photo -- not unlike Dors also did with her own boobs when they were still K-cup. So she's very obviously not suffering or sad much at all, at least not about her boobs (who in their right mind complains about their boobs while provocatively holding them and smiling?). Anyway, I'm shocked that Ellie doesn't have her own Boobpedia article by now, and although I would make one (she's certainly publicly-well-known enough and she's firmly of-age everywhere except the United States, which of course doesn't have a monopoly on the age of legally-sanctioned sexual maturity), I'd rather people who know best how to make articles on here (which I do not), do it instead of me. Btw, there's no way at all of telling whether Ellie will eventually take a topless shot, but for the sake of the sanity of all boob-lovers everywhere both heterosexual-male and lesbian female, I hope to God that she does, lest she make the same mistake Soleil Moon Frye did and get her breasts reduced before ever figuring out she can make money from others' sexual arousal. lol. What say you? [[User:Kikodawgzzz|Kikodawgzzz]] 16:29, 5 December 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 22:49, 5 December 2013

I like boobs. Kikodawgzzz 07:29, 1 July 2011 (EDT)

Please don't add personal information like real names to articles unless they are widely publicly known. Also, don't use articles for speculation about or investigation of other people. Thanks. The Honorable 07:34, 26 September 2013 (EDT)

The Honorable, I respect that you are trying to protect people, but the stark reality is that these facts are publicly known amongst anyone on the internet who has bothered to look (I'll confess I'm an internet junkie, but that doesn't make this any less true in this case). The biggest problem I have with you as an admin is that you unilaterally remove edits like mine without discussion. Admins are admins, but they are also users and like other wiki users, admins have an inherent responsibility to discuss any changes, including any reverts. In fact, rather than reverting, your policy is to completely delete an edit you don't like. That's not how a wiki is supposed to operate. Also, you don't have a Terms of Service wherein you state that edits like mine are not permissible. You would need a clearly-defined set of rules for this wiki, including the rule that edits like mine are not permissible, in order to be justified in continuing to unilaterally delete them. And that set of rules would have to be endorsed by all admins across the entire wiki. It's a dictatorship otherwise. Kikodawgzzz 11:47, 3 October 2013 (EDT)
After a bit of investigation, I've reinstated your edits, though I don't think that autograph site proves that Samantha Paige is her "real" name. Sorry for jumping to conclusions, but I'd rather err on the side of protecting privacy. (After all, there are reasons why we're not using our real names here. :) ) The Honorable 17:46, 3 October 2013 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.boobpedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Kikodawgzzz&oldid=371869"