Talk:Sara Jay: Difference between revisions
Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (minor change) |
m (→Answer: minor change) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] March 1st, 2012 | [[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] March 1st, 2012 | ||
[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] said : "I restored the [[Sara Jay]] image because it was actually licensed for use on Boobpedia. i.e. a previous contributor had secured permission from the copyright owner to use the image on Boobpedia. I didn't think it was a suitable image for the biobox so I kept it in the body | [[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] said : "I restored the [[Sara Jay]] image because it was actually licensed for use on Boobpedia. i.e. a previous contributor had secured permission from the copyright owner to use the image on Boobpedia. I didn't think it was a suitable image for the biobox so I kept it in the body article." | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 1 March 2012
One nude photo
Athanatophobos 29 February 2012
Hello,
I think one nude photo is enough for Sara Jay. Her page isn't long enough to put several nude photos of hers. Furthermore, the second photo doesn't seem to be interesting.
Answer
Athanatophobos March 1st, 2012
Loose cannon said : "I restored the Sara Jay image because it was actually licensed for use on Boobpedia. i.e. a previous contributor had secured permission from the copyright owner to use the image on Boobpedia. I didn't think it was a suitable image for the biobox so I kept it in the body article."
