Talk:Hannah Claydon: Difference between revisions
Loose cannon (talk | contribs) (message for TaliaShepardFan) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Natural Tits? === | === Natural Tits? === | ||
I don't believe everything I read whether the source be a newspaper, porn magazine or erotic web-site. However, some sources are more credible than others (put more effort into fact-checking, have much wider readership, libel lawyers reviewing articles, etc.) and while Hannah's tits look real to me, the Daily Mail was able to provide details for its claims such as the name of the surgeon and the type of surgery performed. [http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C Your link] does not in any way disprove this information so you should stop removing that content I added (pictures and images). | I don't believe everything I read whether the source be a newspaper, porn magazine or erotic web-site. However, some sources are more credible than others (put more effort into fact-checking, have much wider readership, libel lawyers reviewing articles, etc.) and while Hannah's tits look real to me, the Daily Mail was able to provide details for its claims such as the name of the surgeon and the type of surgery performed. [http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C Your link] does not in any way disprove this information so you should stop removing that content I added (pictures and images). | ||
Sorry, dude! | |||
But you are wrong, look at her Onlytease-Site: | |||
http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C | |||
Revision as of 16:03, 15 March 2011
Removing Information
@TaliaShepardFan, I've already politely asked that you discuss article edits here before carelessly removing my edits and replacing with badly formatted Wiki markup. I spent a lot of time researching information on Hannah and improving this article. Please stop removing the information I added.
Natural Tits?
I don't believe everything I read whether the source be a newspaper, porn magazine or erotic web-site. However, some sources are more credible than others (put more effort into fact-checking, have much wider readership, libel lawyers reviewing articles, etc.) and while Hannah's tits look real to me, the Daily Mail was able to provide details for its claims such as the name of the surgeon and the type of surgery performed. Your link does not in any way disprove this information so you should stop removing that content I added (pictures and images).
Sorry, dude! But you are wrong, look at her Onlytease-Site: http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C
