User talk:Shadowboy19: Difference between revisions
(New section: Blocked) |
Loose cannon (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
You have been blocked from editing for continuing to delete material from articles without explanation. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 18:55, 1 June 2010 (EDT) | You have been blocked from editing for continuing to delete material from articles without explanation. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 18:55, 1 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
: Thanks ''The Honorable''. I found it quite annoying to see pages that I and other editors have worked on being vandalised without explanation and then to simply have the queries erased from the Talk page rather than responded to. I could understand if Shadowboy19 removed the info on the grounds that there wasn't sufficient evidence but that doesn't seem to have been the case.--[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] 09:12, 6 June 2010 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:12, 6 June 2010
Removing Information from Boobpedia
I noticed you removed information on Diamond Foxxx's page about her breasts not being natural and the kind of work she does (lesbian, hardcore, etc.). You didn't provide any reason for removing this information even though it can all be checked out with freely available preview photos and videos of her work. (BTW, your replacement image is much better than the previous version.) --Loose cannon 09:02, 28 February 2010 (EST)
Vandalism
I noticed that you've yet again removed much of the personal information on Diamond Foxxx as well as many other models including Puma Swede, Anette Dawn, Candy Manson, Savannah Stern, Danielle Derek, Teagan Presley and Phoenix Marie. And that's only the first few articles that I've checked. Removing useful information that other editors have spent their free time adding to Boobpedia is vandalism as far as I'm concerned. Most of your edits that I've checked seem to consist of removal of personal information and replacement of the primary picture with a different one of your choosing.--Loose cannon 21:37, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
Image:Jenna Jameson Bunny.JPG
Sorry, but that Jenna Jameson image is just too cheesy. :) Also, there may be legal issues because of the use of the Playboy logo. The Honorable 17:02, 7 March 2010 (EST)
Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for continuing to delete material from articles without explanation. The Honorable 18:55, 1 June 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks The Honorable. I found it quite annoying to see pages that I and other editors have worked on being vandalised without explanation and then to simply have the queries erased from the Talk page rather than responded to. I could understand if Shadowboy19 removed the info on the grounds that there wasn't sufficient evidence but that doesn't seem to have been the case.--Loose cannon 09:12, 6 June 2010 (EDT)