Boobpedia:Editors room

The Editors room is a place for Boobpedia editors to coordinate their efforts.

Recommended software

• Firefox - Firefox has precise text selection (Internet Explorer selects text in clumps), built-in spell check, and most importantly keeps your work in case of a server hiccup while saving an article and you have to press the back button.
• ClipCache Pro - Save frequently used text in an unlimited-slot clipboard. It's perfect for quickly calling up templates and much more.

Model interviews

Do you have contact with a busty woman, or think that you can get in touch with one? She could be a model, pornstar, general celebrity, or amateur - being famous is not necessary. Boobpedia is always looking to interview busty women, so if you know a suitable subject, please ask her to email a Boobpedia administrator. You just might see her featured on Boobpedia!

To do list for editors (feel free to add your own)

• Add the most important entries from

1. Boobpedia:Requests
2. Babepedia add all models using this shortcode: * Editors room profile on Babepedia
3. BBWFANFEST Big Boobs BBW Adult Trade Show & Awards Show July 26-28, 2013 Las Vegas
4. Stars with massive breasts in Mr. Skin
   • Stars with natural massive breasts in Mr. Skin
5. Stars with large breasts on Mr. Skin
   • Stars with natural large breasts on Mr. Skin
6. All Scoreland Models [1]
7. The Breast Files Models
8. The Busty Celebs Models
9. Big Breast Archive - Models
10. Big Tit models from Bang Bros
11. Gent Online Models
12. Anilos
13. 18 and Busty
14. Babesrater
15. Big Tit Videos from Bangyoulater
16. Busty girls from Cosmid.net
17. Big Naturals Models
18. This Is Glamour models
19. Big Boobed Models
20. Breast Enlargement ProgressionBefore and after breast implants[2]
21. [Category:First Time Videos models] and Category:FTV Girls models need merged. They are for the same website. I'm unsure how to create this re-direct.

• Is it possible to make the database searchable by several fields, ie G cups, and Fake breasts, and redhead, and 5'7?
• Is it possible to add an "events" category that can be listed in calendar form?

Identification

Wouldn't it be better, if there would be one page called Boobpedia:Identification where everybody could aks for ID instead of whole pages just for one ID? Solved ID requests could be deleted or moved to an archive. I think this would be a better solution than the current practice. What do you think?--Lichter 11:02, 11 December 2012 (EST)

That's an excellent idea. We should work out some sort of format for such a page. The Honorable 17:21, 11 December 2012 (EST)

Okay, I tried it. See Boobpedia:Identification and feel free to improve it. --Lichter 18:28, 11 December 2012 (EST)

Seems like, ID requests should all be (or all are) tagged with Category:Identification_needed, and this creates a list of pages similar to what is being suggested, except what is suggested, requires list maintenance. EditorsChoice (talk) 19:58, 22 August 2019 (EDT)

Photos in user pages

I suggest that fair use images should no longer be allowed in user pages, much the same as with Wikipedia. They should only be allowed within articles or ID pages/the request page. Boobs Online 17:49, 24 December 2012 (EST)

You're absolutely right. Unless the user page contains some sort of article about the photo subject, they should not be used on user pages. The Honorable 14:36, 30 December 2012 (EST)

Should we start removing them from such pages? These are examples of pages I found when tagging unused images - User:Loose cannon/Images and User:Marcus. Boobs Online 17:10, 30 December 2012 (EST)

I think users should be notified first, so they have a chance to change it themselves. The Honorable 21:21, 30 December 2012 (EST)

Edit summaries

Are editors encouraged to leave edit summaries here? It's frustrating to have edits reverted with no edit summary explaining the reason. A quick edit summary would be extremely beneficial; is a policy being violated or is it just a matter of differing opinions? JennaDollFan 13:21, 4 October 2014 (EDT)

Minor biobox issue(applies mainly for TS/TG models)

At present putting a yes for hardcore causes the "Boy/Girl" section under Performances to list the model as having done vaginal sex scenes. This is clearly inaccurate for a large number of TS/TG models. The simplest workaround for this is to leave hardcore blank. --Quorwyf 18:50, 15 February 2015 (EST)

Changing Cup/Bra Size Over Time

How do you deal with the inevitable growth most women, especially natural, have over time. Take Danica Collins, early 80s to 2013. When she started as a page 3 Girl in the UK at 16, she was a lithe 32E (UK), and by the time she retired at 49, she was a buxom MILF, hourglass, 34GG or H (UK). msjayhawk (talk) 23:04, 19 November 2018 (EST)

I agree boobs tend to increase or shrink in size. In such a case, the latest stats on the measurements can be taken. Also i appreciate the use of bobstory template in this regard. But many times the information across the timeline is not available.

Ashley Tisdale is an example of this but I'm not sure of a way to verify it for her. She started out as a 34A then went up some time in the mid-to-late 2000s to at least a C/D and now is back down to having her implants removed after implant illness. Is she worthy of an article? User:Bluesman2383 09:06, 6 June 2021 (CST).

Shown versus Leaked

I'm not sure if this has been discussed previously, but can we get some clarification on the topic of what a model has shown in instances where things that are not meant for public consumption are "leaked," not shown.

• http://www.boobpedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=Sexy_Mandy&oldid=612217

Should there be a leaked flag in Template:Biobox new? EditorsChoice (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2019 (EDT)

• http://www.boobpedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=Renee_Olstead&oldid=302265

Leak highlighted, but 'shown' remains blanked, in contrast to the handling of the Sexy Mandy leaks. EditorsChoice (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2019 (EDT)

Internal Errors

I've been running into this a lot lately.

Internal error Jump to navigation Jump to search [XtsENKfLCmBGfPagykIv4wAAAE4] 2020-06-06 02:49:24: Fatal exception of type "Error"]

That one came from trying to look at the Olivia O'Lovely page. Is there something wrong on my end?

It's a glitch caused by a recent software upgrade. For now, deleting or commenting out <ref> tags will cause the page to display normally. The Honorable (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Natural/Fake boob change

biobox should include boob enchantments. for example briana banks had a lovely saggy tits in very beginning of her career or latoya devi had big natural saggy boobs but both have fake tits now.Yesjulz (talk) 02:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Unrealistic Categories

hi, i am fan of puffy and missile tits like most people here (i guess) and got disappointed after checked 5-6 girls because they dont fit the category. can we create sub-categories for narrowing the list? let's say, extreme puffies (like faye reagan or recently alina kova's) for puffy nipples or extreme missiles (like lana wood or traci lords or more recently emma sinclaire's) for missile boobs. no idea... for example, i dont call missile boobs of first 5 women from the missile boobs list (from abbey brooks to abelia). more than that, it says there are 1,562 girls who have missile boobs which is ridiculous and unrealistic. missile boobs and puffy nipples are rare things. most of these tits are not even missile or puffy.

the reason why i say this i dont think people would be happy when they could find only 50-60 girls have their favorite boob types from 1562 girls. we should simplify this by making sub-categories if you ask me.

another thing is sorting the list by creation/adding date. you know people could come here in every 3 weeks to check if there is a new girl who falls under their fav. breast type. currently you never know if there is a new girl added here because it is sorted alphabetical. Yesjulz (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)