Talk:Lissette Marie: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with " == Fake or the most perfect naturals ever? == I watched two of her videos to determine whether her breasts are real or fake because they seemed to be a little bit too perky...")
 
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
BUT sometimes it looks like there is some implant rippling [http://imgur.com/i8AUUhW] [http://imgur.com/A2fT1Ny] and strange edges [http://imgur.com/hrPunhW] which obviously shouldn't occur with natural breasts, maybe it's just the lighting and the shadows or the poor render quality of the video. As far as i know playboy advertised her as all natural.  
BUT sometimes it looks like there is some implant rippling [http://imgur.com/i8AUUhW] [http://imgur.com/A2fT1Ny] and strange edges [http://imgur.com/hrPunhW] which obviously shouldn't occur with natural breasts, maybe it's just the lighting and the shadows or the poor render quality of the video. As far as i know playboy advertised her as all natural.  


What are your thoughts on this matter?
What are your thoughts on this matter? - [[User:Masterblaster|Masterblaster]]

Revision as of 02:13, 26 September 2016

Fake or the most perfect naturals ever?

I watched two of her videos to determine whether her breasts are real or fake because they seemed to be a little bit too perky but even now i can't tell for sure.

There appear to be no scars, the video is full of underboob or areola shots. [1] [2]

And even though they are perky they flatten out quite nicely, and again definitely no scars. [3]

BUT sometimes it looks like there is some implant rippling [4] [5] and strange edges [6] which obviously shouldn't occur with natural breasts, maybe it's just the lighting and the shadows or the poor render quality of the video. As far as i know playboy advertised her as all natural.

What are your thoughts on this matter? - Masterblaster