Talk:Dani Mathers: Difference between revisions
Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== 2016 | == 2016 scandal == | ||
A member said the 2016 body scandal is irrevelant : "This is an "encyclopedia of big boobs", not Wikipedia. This isn't relevant.". Although some pages contain some kind of informations like [[Keeley Hazell]]'s page. If you don't want to read that, ok, but don't delete the discust. It's not mature. | A member said the 2016 body scandal is irrevelant : "This is an "encyclopedia of big boobs", not Wikipedia. This isn't relevant.". Although some pages contain some kind of informations like [[Keeley Hazell]]'s page. If you don't want to read that, ok, but don't delete the discust. It's not mature. | ||
[[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] August 7th, 2016. | [[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] August 7th, 2016. | ||
== Answer == | |||
:Shall we go around posting everything Kim Kardashian has ever tweeted? How about reporting on all the nonsense Jenny McCarthy has every come out with about vaccines "causing autism"? That's a bigger scandal than Dani Mathers posting some picture on snapchat, but I don't see it mentioned on her page. Why? It's not relevant. [[User:JoeBethersonton|JoeBethersonton]] ([[User talk:JoeBethersonton|talk]]) 13:38, 8 August 2016 (EDT) | :Shall we go around posting everything Kim Kardashian has ever tweeted? How about reporting on all the nonsense Jenny McCarthy has every come out with about vaccines "causing autism"? That's a bigger scandal than Dani Mathers posting some picture on snapchat, but I don't see it mentioned on her page. Why? It's not relevant. [[User:JoeBethersonton|JoeBethersonton]] ([[User talk:JoeBethersonton|talk]]) 13:38, 8 August 2016 (EDT) | ||
== Answer 2 == | |||
It's not up to you to delete this kind of information.I will be crazy with your bad behaviour. If your don't want to read that, just skip that. Please STOP !!!!!! | |||
The moderator warned you about that yesterday and you're still doing your bad stuff. | |||
== Answer 3 == | |||
It's up to YOU to justify why this trivial nonsense should be included. And please sign your comments, whoever you are. JoeBethersonton (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:18, 11 August 2016
2016 scandal
A member said the 2016 body scandal is irrevelant : "This is an "encyclopedia of big boobs", not Wikipedia. This isn't relevant.". Although some pages contain some kind of informations like Keeley Hazell's page. If you don't want to read that, ok, but don't delete the discust. It's not mature.
Athanatophobos August 7th, 2016.
Answer
- Shall we go around posting everything Kim Kardashian has ever tweeted? How about reporting on all the nonsense Jenny McCarthy has every come out with about vaccines "causing autism"? That's a bigger scandal than Dani Mathers posting some picture on snapchat, but I don't see it mentioned on her page. Why? It's not relevant. JoeBethersonton (talk) 13:38, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
Answer 2
It's not up to you to delete this kind of information.I will be crazy with your bad behaviour. If your don't want to read that, just skip that. Please STOP !!!!!!
The moderator warned you about that yesterday and you're still doing your bad stuff.
Answer 3
It's up to YOU to justify why this trivial nonsense should be included. And please sign your comments, whoever you are. JoeBethersonton (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2016 (EDT)
