Talk:Abigail Ratchford: Difference between revisions
Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
http://imagetwist.com/br7jmcnrhodu/67FMz.jpg.html | http://imagetwist.com/br7jmcnrhodu/67FMz.jpg.html | ||
"Are images[http://www.barnorama.com/wp-content/images/2012/03/abigail-ratchford3/02-abigail-ratchford3.jpg][https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xfp1/t51.2885-15/e15/10859955_1051900114826583_407874913_n.jpg][http://thedirty.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/php6HDrjs.jpg] a reliable source as far as natural vs. enhanced goes? —[[User:Squalla1|Squalla1]] 13:22, 30 October 2015 (EDT)" | |||
Are images[http://www.barnorama.com/wp-content/images/2012/03/abigail-ratchford3/02-abigail-ratchford3.jpg][https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xfp1/t51.2885-15/e15/10859955_1051900114826583_407874913_n.jpg][http://thedirty.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/php6HDrjs.jpg] a reliable source as far as natural vs. enhanced goes? —[[User:Squalla1|Squalla1]] 13:22, 30 October 2015 (EDT) | Squalla1 send these links to me. What do you think? ''— Preceeding unsigned comment added by [[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]].'' | ||
:I'm gonna go ahead and set it to "enhanced". Plenty of pre-surgery evidence in the following link: http://www.automotofoto.net/models/abigail-ratchford/ Remarkable implants for sure, but good fakes are still fake. ''—[[User:Squalla1|Squalla1]] 00:13, 21 November 2015 (EST)'' | |||
Revision as of 05:13, 21 November 2015
Natural or enhanced
Is there an underboob scar? http://imagetwist.com/br7jmcnrhodu/67FMz.jpg.html
"Are images[1][2][3] a reliable source as far as natural vs. enhanced goes? —Squalla1 13:22, 30 October 2015 (EDT)" Squalla1 send these links to me. What do you think? — Preceeding unsigned comment added by Athanatophobos.
- I'm gonna go ahead and set it to "enhanced". Plenty of pre-surgery evidence in the following link: http://www.automotofoto.net/models/abigail-ratchford/ Remarkable implants for sure, but good fakes are still fake. —Squalla1 00:13, 21 November 2015 (EST)
