User talk:Masterblaster: Difference between revisions
(→Answer) |
m (amber price) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Your pictures are too big, don't forget you can size them. I'm sorry but I don't see any scars in these shoots. | Your pictures are too big, don't forget you can size them. I'm sorry but I don't see any scars in these shoots. | ||
== [[Amber Price]] == | |||
[[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] October 4th, 2015 | |||
Hello, I was surprised about your modifications for [[Amber Price]]. "Enhanced" to "natural" boobs without an explanation and by deleting the references? | |||
Regards. | |||
Revision as of 05:00, 4 October 2015
Maggie May
Athanatophobos March 4th, 2015
Hello, I don't see any scars in 1:12 and passim in your video.
Don't forget you should add reliable sources.
Regards.
Answer
Answer 2
I saw this passage but I don't think it's a scar. It's just some water in her breast. It doesn't look like a scar.
Maggie May
Athanatophobos July 12th, 2015
Hello, you did the same think like few months ago. You think Maggie has got enhanced boobs without adding reliable sources. We can't see any scars in the videos. It's just an amateur job.
Don't making wild changes by deleting other members's work.
Regards.
Answer
Well, I just think that pictures of scars (at least that's what I see) should be proof enough. It is not my intention to make wild changes. Just found this, there definitely is some visible scarring, if you look closely at her right underboob. I hope we can settle that in peace mate ;-)
Answer
Your pictures are too big, don't forget you can size them. I'm sorry but I don't see any scars in these shoots.
Amber Price
Athanatophobos October 4th, 2015
Hello, I was surprised about your modifications for Amber Price. "Enhanced" to "natural" boobs without an explanation and by deleting the references?
Regards.