User talk:Nptime: Difference between revisions
Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Answer) |
SB Fan 1983 (talk | contribs) m (→Answer) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Man if you don't want to see the stitch marks it's fine by me. But "BoobPedia" should be as real as it gets so it must have real information for the boobs involved. I will change back the referance and i will inform the aministrators to judge the difference. | Man if you don't want to see the stitch marks it's fine by me. But "BoobPedia" should be as real as it gets so it must have real information for the boobs involved. I will change back the referance and i will inform the aministrators to judge the difference. | ||
We can't see marks where no marks are! | |||
Revision as of 08:50, 29 July 2014
Emma Glover
Athanatophobos July 28th 2014
Hello,
I saw you wrote Emma Glover has got enhanced boobs. Can you tell us where is your references? Meanwhile, I let natural references.
Regards.
Answer
I just saw the video and I didn't see any marks!
- For a second opinion, I watched the video and I have to agree with Nptime, there were stitch marks where she had the surgery done. Ah, well... --Cochrane 02:51, 29 July 2014 (EDT)
There are no marks!
Answer
Man if you don't want to see the stitch marks it's fine by me. But "BoobPedia" should be as real as it gets so it must have real information for the boobs involved. I will change back the referance and i will inform the aministrators to judge the difference.
We can't see marks where no marks are!
