User talk:Dekkappai: Difference between revisions
Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* If the sites provide some useful information, and aren't just come-ons for membership sites, they should be okay. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 20:09, 27 February 2008 (EST) | * If the sites provide some useful information, and aren't just come-ons for membership sites, they should be okay. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 20:09, 27 February 2008 (EST) | ||
** If it's related to big breasts, it is probably a suitable subject for an article. :) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 17:20, 1 March 2008 (EST) | ** If it's related to big breasts, it is probably a suitable subject for an article. :) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 17:20, 1 March 2008 (EST) | ||
I agree with you about movie posters and video covers in a filmography -- I can't imagine any video producers objecting to using covers for that. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 17:38, 2 March 2008 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 22:38, 2 March 2008
Welcome back
I can't think of any recent major changes. You should have no problem continuing to contribute. :) The Honorable 17:47, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- If the sites provide some useful information, and aren't just come-ons for membership sites, they should be okay. The Honorable 20:09, 27 February 2008 (EST)
- If it's related to big breasts, it is probably a suitable subject for an article. :) The Honorable 17:20, 1 March 2008 (EST)
I agree with you about movie posters and video covers in a filmography -- I can't imagine any video producers objecting to using covers for that. The Honorable 17:38, 2 March 2008 (EST)
