User talk:Hermes86: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
This goddess is as natural as it is possible. I don't know if she has had an enlargement after her playboy time but i don't think so. | This goddess is as natural as it is possible. I don't know if she has had an enlargement after her playboy time but i don't think so. | ||
regards | regards | ||
== [[Nadine Chanz]] == | |||
[[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] 5th June, 2015 | |||
Hello, | |||
I've noticed that you changed the [[Leanne Crow]]'s page, you wrote she's got natural breasts despite some doubt in that area (due to unusual perkiness to size, slight appearance of scars under the breast, ETC). | |||
If you have proof one way or the other, please present it... Until then, please leave the category blank. | |||
Regards. | |||
Revision as of 13:29, 5 June 2015
Nadine Chanz
Athanatophobos February 25th, 2014
Hello,
I saw you changed the Nadine Chanz's page. You wrote she's got a natural breast despite the references. Do you have new references?
Regards.
Hi, i have all of her pictures and asure you that her boobs are natural! ;-) I don't know why a lot of people can't see the scars and implants of some models that are presented as naturals but if there is a natural shaped breast without any scar you can be sure that there is no silicone. And if a woman lies on her back you will see every scar of an augmentation and the implants. This goddess is as natural as it is possible. I don't know if she has had an enlargement after her playboy time but i don't think so. regards
Nadine Chanz
Athanatophobos 5th June, 2015
Hello,
I've noticed that you changed the Leanne Crow's page, you wrote she's got natural breasts despite some doubt in that area (due to unusual perkiness to size, slight appearance of scars under the breast, ETC).
If you have proof one way or the other, please present it... Until then, please leave the category blank.
Regards.
