User talk:Kikodawgzzz: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


[comment deleted] [[User:Kikodawgzzz|Kikodawgzzz]] 16:29, 5 December 2013 (EST)
[comment deleted] [[User:Kikodawgzzz|Kikodawgzzz]] 16:29, 5 December 2013 (EST)
: Given that she doesn't seem fond of her breasts and wants to get them reduced, making an article wouldn't be helpful. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 17:52, 5 December 2013 (EST)
: Given that she (Ellie Jaycock- [edit]) doesn't seem fond of her breasts and wants to get them reduced, making an article wouldn't be helpful. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 17:52, 5 December 2013 (EST)
::Did you genuinely have to delete my entire comment? Absolutely nothing within the comment is hidden content, and her boobs are amazing and very very sexy-- but more importantly, I spent three-quarters of my explanation affirming just how hypocritical her supposed lack of fondness towards her boobs is, when at the same time in every single picture, she's not just smiling and happy, but also actively putting her hands on her boobs, blatantly showing them off. Someone who is unhappy about her boobs won't do that, the same way a guy who is unhappy about his small dick wouldn't go out of his way to photograph himself smiling and holding his naked boner. Seriously, Ellie's supposed dissatisfaction with her boobs mirrors the blatant hypocrisy of Dors Feline, who on the one hand did all kinds of porn featuring her breasts, and then suddenly reverted to civilian life and went on and on about how much she had always 'hated' her chest. In short, Ellie self-evidently acts as though she is unhappy about her breasts while in reality she's fine with them, or at least is fine enough with them to exploit them, which again, if she was really unhappy with them, she wouldn't dare do. Finally, once again, PLEASE stop deleting comments and writing that have _publicly findable_ resources in them. I am NOT violating confidentiality or being inappropriate by featuring such things. I am not leaking anything. And I don't appreciate being treated as though I am doing that. [[User:Kikodawgzzz|Kikodawgzzz]] 19:48, 5 December 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 00:48, 6 December 2013

I like boobs. Kikodawgzzz 07:29, 1 July 2011 (EDT)

Please don't add personal information like real names to articles unless they are widely publicly known. Also, don't use articles for speculation about or investigation of other people. Thanks. The Honorable 07:34, 26 September 2013 (EDT)

The Honorable, I respect that you are trying to protect people, but the stark reality is that these facts are publicly known amongst anyone on the internet who has bothered to look (I'll confess I'm an internet junkie, but that doesn't make this any less true in this case). The biggest problem I have with you as an admin is that you unilaterally remove edits like mine without discussion. Admins are admins, but they are also users and like other wiki users, admins have an inherent responsibility to discuss any changes, including any reverts. In fact, rather than reverting, your policy is to completely delete an edit you don't like. That's not how a wiki is supposed to operate. Also, you don't have a Terms of Service wherein you state that edits like mine are not permissible. You would need a clearly-defined set of rules for this wiki, including the rule that edits like mine are not permissible, in order to be justified in continuing to unilaterally delete them. And that set of rules would have to be endorsed by all admins across the entire wiki. It's a dictatorship otherwise. Kikodawgzzz 11:47, 3 October 2013 (EDT)
After a bit of investigation, I've reinstated your edits, though I don't think that autograph site proves that Samantha Paige is her "real" name. Sorry for jumping to conclusions, but I'd rather err on the side of protecting privacy. (After all, there are reasons why we're not using our real names here. :) ) The Honorable 17:46, 3 October 2013 (EDT)

[comment deleted] Kikodawgzzz 16:29, 5 December 2013 (EST)

Given that she (Ellie Jaycock- [edit]) doesn't seem fond of her breasts and wants to get them reduced, making an article wouldn't be helpful. The Honorable 17:52, 5 December 2013 (EST)
Did you genuinely have to delete my entire comment? Absolutely nothing within the comment is hidden content, and her boobs are amazing and very very sexy-- but more importantly, I spent three-quarters of my explanation affirming just how hypocritical her supposed lack of fondness towards her boobs is, when at the same time in every single picture, she's not just smiling and happy, but also actively putting her hands on her boobs, blatantly showing them off. Someone who is unhappy about her boobs won't do that, the same way a guy who is unhappy about his small dick wouldn't go out of his way to photograph himself smiling and holding his naked boner. Seriously, Ellie's supposed dissatisfaction with her boobs mirrors the blatant hypocrisy of Dors Feline, who on the one hand did all kinds of porn featuring her breasts, and then suddenly reverted to civilian life and went on and on about how much she had always 'hated' her chest. In short, Ellie self-evidently acts as though she is unhappy about her breasts while in reality she's fine with them, or at least is fine enough with them to exploit them, which again, if she was really unhappy with them, she wouldn't dare do. Finally, once again, PLEASE stop deleting comments and writing that have _publicly findable_ resources in them. I am NOT violating confidentiality or being inappropriate by featuring such things. I am not leaking anything. And I don't appreciate being treated as though I am doing that. Kikodawgzzz 19:48, 5 December 2013 (EST)