User talk:Kikodawgzzz: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


Please don't add personal information like real names to articles unless they are widely publicly known. Also, don't use articles for speculation about or investigation of other people. Thanks. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 07:34, 26 September 2013 (EDT)
Please don't add personal information like real names to articles unless they are widely publicly known. Also, don't use articles for speculation about or investigation of other people. Thanks. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 07:34, 26 September 2013 (EDT)
:[[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]], I respect that you are trying to protect people, but the stark reality is that these facts are publicly known amongst anyone on the internet who has bothered to look (I'll confess I'm an internet junkie, but that doesn't make this any less true in this case). The biggest problem I have with you as an admin is that you unilaterally remove edits like mine without discussion. Admins are admins, but they are also users and like other wiki users, admins have an inherent responsibility to discuss any changes, including any reverts. In fact, rather than reverting, your policy is to completely delete an edit you don't like. That's not how a wiki is supposed to operate. Also, you don't have a Terms of Service wherein you state that edits like mine are not permissible. You would need a clearly-defined set of rules for this wiki, including the rule that edits like mine are not permissible, in order to be justified in continuing to unilaterally delete them. And that set of rules would have to be endorsed by all admins across the entire wiki. It's a dictatorship otherwise. [[User:Kikodawgzzz|Kikodawgzzz]] 11:47, 3 October 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:47, 3 October 2013

I like boobs. Kikodawgzzz 07:29, 1 July 2011 (EDT)

Please don't add personal information like real names to articles unless they are widely publicly known. Also, don't use articles for speculation about or investigation of other people. Thanks. The Honorable 07:34, 26 September 2013 (EDT)

The Honorable, I respect that you are trying to protect people, but the stark reality is that these facts are publicly known amongst anyone on the internet who has bothered to look (I'll confess I'm an internet junkie, but that doesn't make this any less true in this case). The biggest problem I have with you as an admin is that you unilaterally remove edits like mine without discussion. Admins are admins, but they are also users and like other wiki users, admins have an inherent responsibility to discuss any changes, including any reverts. In fact, rather than reverting, your policy is to completely delete an edit you don't like. That's not how a wiki is supposed to operate. Also, you don't have a Terms of Service wherein you state that edits like mine are not permissible. You would need a clearly-defined set of rules for this wiki, including the rule that edits like mine are not permissible, in order to be justified in continuing to unilaterally delete them. And that set of rules would have to be endorsed by all admins across the entire wiki. It's a dictatorship otherwise. Kikodawgzzz 11:47, 3 October 2013 (EDT)