Talk:Leanne Crow

Natural ?

Ok, so I have a question, if Leanne Crow is all natural as is claimed on numerous sites, why does she have scars under her breasts...?

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/707/curiouse.png/

It looks like they've been covered up by makeup and the one on her left breast is easier to see when they're moving (IE watching the vid), but they are there.

Breast implants ?

Hello,

Athanatophobos March 6, 2013

You must be right. In this picture : we can see a scar under her right breast. I will delete "natural ref".

• 

Answer

I don't see any scars.

User 2072: I must admit, I don't see them either in the picture to the left, but they ARE visible in the imageshack picture at the top.

Answer

In the picture that I shew you wecan see a scar under her right breast. You can't see it ??

1

Sorry, but that doesn't look like a scar.

2

User2072: I've just read an interesting comment on www.MyBoobSite.com

"The one people are talking about as being ‘Enhanced’ is Leanne Crow, her boobs are not only unnaturally perky, but also when she previously was a double G cup one of her breasts was very noticably larger then the other, now they’re larger K cups and equal in size." - Anon

Now, I'm no expert on Macromastia and Gigantomastia, but typically when a woman has one breast larger than the other and she later increases in size (either through natural growth or weight gain) the difference between the two breasts usually increases, but as pointed out by 'anon' they're now equal (almost anyway).

I'm guessing Ms. Crow had a fair sized pair to start with (GG cups) and didn't like the difference, and so had implants in each to increase their size and balance them out.

Admittedly it's just speculation at this point, but combined with the picture of the makeup covered implant scars and I'm thinking they're definitely enhanced.

Real

I'm not sure how everyone can agree they are implants. They don't have the shape of fake and don't move like them either. Everything about them looks natural. The 'scar' under them looks very much to me like a rash, naturally large breasted women get them under their breasts regularly due to the overhanging of skin and heat. The growth difference can also be explained away. Breasts don't grow evenly and if they hadn't reached their full size (which at GG they hadn't) one would more than likely be bigger than the other. The only downside to this is that they've stopped growing at KKs! ~The Baron

THE PROOF THAT THEY ARE FAKE

Look at the shape of her tits in this pic. It's pretty clear to everyone that there is an implant shell inside her brasts.

• [1]

--Drakonov 12:38, 11 March 2013 (EDT)

Sorry, but don't waste our time with pics they don't proof anything.

answer

your link doesn't work ;(

answer

I am really doubt it, that the site in the link really exists

answer

I changed your link and we can see it now ^^

answer

@Real, a rash REALLY?

A rash is reddened skin, not a line shaped protruision (on each breast), and her breasts 'were' different sizes, the left was larger than the right (when she was GG), now however they're almost the same size at KK.

Breasts DO grow unevenly yes, it's actually common, but that difference continues and is amplified as the breasts grow larger (the difference becomes more and more pronounced), in Leannes case however the reverse is true, the difference has actually reduced... That doesn't normally happen, except with the assistance of a surgeons scalpel.

I delete the fake info on her breast cuz there no proof for it.

answer

OK, I've uploaded a small clip of the video from which the Imageshack image was taken: https://anonfiles.com/file/d0bea8179e73269b53cc5a6c8bb6c817

I had to upload it to anonfiles because dailymotion only would allow it in really low quality (It's a .RAR of a .WMV BTW, and there's no sound).

If you watch her breasts you can see there are two lines crossing each of them, one larger line is a crease where her breasts have been marked by her bra cup and that's perfectly normal with breasts that large, however below them there are very short lines that protrude from the breast... They look a hell of a lot like implant scars covered by makeup to me.

answer

Hm, I see the lines you are referring to but would those not also be made from having several attempts at making that shot by putting the bra on and off again and holding it against the skin? I agree very much that they look like scars covered by make-up but the proof just isn't in the end product to me. They look, act and move like real boobs. I have never seen implants that size that move as 'organically'.

answer

Ordinarily I'd agree with you, but those smaller lines are protruding (they stick out from the breats) as oppsed to the usual indentations created by the bra cup, seen in the longer line (look at the way the shadow falls on the marks, it's reversed for the larger line).

I think she had a fairly large pair to begin with and just had them 'boosted' to even out the size difference, as the implant is smaller it's much less noticable, because it's covered by a large real breast.

See: Julia Miles for an example (hers are more noticable, but if done smaller they'd be virtually undetectable).

Hmm, I read on a MyBoobSite article that Leanne Crow lost weight some time ago... But her breasts actually 'increased' in size, given that boobs are in general composed primarily of fat, I'd like to know how that's possible.