User talk:YankeeFan90: Difference between revisions
Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==boobstars category== i don't think this is a valid category. it's both extremely broad (actresses, models or singers, who all have their own categories), and subjective (popularity is s...) |
(New section: FOB Productions images?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
i don't think this is a valid category. it's both extremely broad (actresses, models or singers, who all have their own categories), and subjective (popularity is subjective). i'm afraid i'll have to delete it. you are welcome to discuss this with me if you disagree. thanks --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 00:59, 21 November 2007 (EST) | i don't think this is a valid category. it's both extremely broad (actresses, models or singers, who all have their own categories), and subjective (popularity is subjective). i'm afraid i'll have to delete it. you are welcome to discuss this with me if you disagree. thanks --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 00:59, 21 November 2007 (EST) | ||
== FOB Productions images? == | |||
Just checking: Are you connected with FOB Productions? If you are, that's cool, but if you're not, their images need to be tagged as fair use, not media licensed. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 18:05, 28 January 2008 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 23:05, 28 January 2008
boobstars category
i don't think this is a valid category. it's both extremely broad (actresses, models or singers, who all have their own categories), and subjective (popularity is subjective). i'm afraid i'll have to delete it. you are welcome to discuss this with me if you disagree. thanks --Hexvoodoo 00:59, 21 November 2007 (EST)
FOB Productions images?
Just checking: Are you connected with FOB Productions? If you are, that's cool, but if you're not, their images need to be tagged as fair use, not media licensed. The Honorable 18:05, 28 January 2008 (EST)
