Talk:Sara Jay: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
m (minor change)
Line 10: Line 10:
==Answer==
==Answer==


[[User:Athanatyophobos|Athanatophobos]]
[[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] March 1st, 2012


[[User:Loose Canon|Loose Canon]] said : "I restored the [[Sara Jay]] image because it was actually licensed for use on Boobpedia. i.e. a previous contributor had secured permission from the copyright owner to use the image on Boobpedia. I didn't think it was a suitable image for the biobox so I kept it in the body article. For Rebecca Linares, the image showed how she looked before her enhancement surgery so from an encylopaedic perspective the image greatly enhanced her article."
[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] said : "I restored the [[Sara Jay]] image because it was actually licensed for use on Boobpedia. i.e. a previous contributor had secured permission from the copyright owner to use the image on Boobpedia. I didn't think it was a suitable image for the biobox so I kept it in the body article. For Rebecca Linares, the image showed how she looked before her enhancement surgery so from an encylopaedic perspective the image greatly enhanced her article."

Revision as of 18:57, 1 March 2012

One nude photo

Athanatophobos 29 February 2012

Hello,

I think one nude photo is enough for Sara Jay. Her page isn't long enough to put several nude photos of hers. Furthermore, the second photo doesn't seem to be interesting.

Answer

Athanatophobos March 1st, 2012

Loose cannon said : "I restored the Sara Jay image because it was actually licensed for use on Boobpedia. i.e. a previous contributor had secured permission from the copyright owner to use the image on Boobpedia. I didn't think it was a suitable image for the biobox so I kept it in the body article. For Rebecca Linares, the image showed how she looked before her enhancement surgery so from an encylopaedic perspective the image greatly enhanced her article."