Talk:Hannah Claydon: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Loose cannon (talk | contribs) (response) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:: I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are acting in good faith but rather than repeat myself, I'll ask you to actually read what I wrote above. If you disagree with what I wrote, then please feel free to put forward a constructive counter argument. --[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] 17:55, 20 March 2011 (EDT) | :: I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are acting in good faith but rather than repeat myself, I'll ask you to actually read what I wrote above. If you disagree with what I wrote, then please feel free to put forward a constructive counter argument. --[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] 17:55, 20 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
I'm unsure why this is a disputed topic, regarding breast authenticity. It's no secret that she had enhancements done a few years ago. She even spoke about it on Babestation, while sat with another model. | |||
I'm unsure why this is a disputed topic, regarding breast authenticity. It's no secret that she had enhancements done a few years ago. She even spoke about it on Babestation, while sat with another model.{{unsigned|Stalfos|28 February 2012}} | |||
: That was some actually some idiot who lacked basic cognitive and communication skills. He'd vandalised a large number of articles by changing enhanced or unknown status to natural boobs. At first, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and tried reasoning with him in a polite and respectful manner but if he bothered to respond at all, it was as if all the points went completely over his head. I wasted far too much time on him. He was eventually banned for destructive behaviour - though he annoyingly kept coming back and creating new accounts. --[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] 14:51, 28 February 2012 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 28 February 2012
Removing Information
@TaliaShepardFan, I've already politely asked that you discuss article edits here before carelessly removing my edits and replacing with badly formatted Wiki markup. I spent a lot of time researching information on Hannah and improving this article. Please stop removing the information I added.
Natural Tits?
I don't believe everything I read whether the source be a newspaper, porn magazine or erotic web-site. However, some sources are more credible than others (put more effort into fact-checking, have much wider readership, libel lawyers reviewing articles, etc.) and while Hannah's tits look real to me, the Daily Mail was able to provide details for its claims such as the name of the surgeon and the type of surgery performed. Your link does not in any way disprove this information so you should stop removing that content I added (pictures and images). --Loose cannon 15:22, 15 March 2011 (EDT)
- Sorry, dude! But you are wrong, look at her Onlytease-Site: http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C —Preceding unsigned comment added by TaliaShepardFan (talk • contribs) 15 March 2011. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
- I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are acting in good faith but rather than repeat myself, I'll ask you to actually read what I wrote above. If you disagree with what I wrote, then please feel free to put forward a constructive counter argument. --Loose cannon 17:55, 20 March 2011 (EDT)
I'm unsure why this is a disputed topic, regarding breast authenticity. It's no secret that she had enhancements done a few years ago. She even spoke about it on Babestation, while sat with another model.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stalfos (talk • contribs) 28 February 2012. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
- That was some actually some idiot who lacked basic cognitive and communication skills. He'd vandalised a large number of articles by changing enhanced or unknown status to natural boobs. At first, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and tried reasoning with him in a polite and respectful manner but if he bothered to respond at all, it was as if all the points went completely over his head. I wasted far too much time on him. He was eventually banned for destructive behaviour - though he annoyingly kept coming back and creating new accounts. --Loose cannon 14:51, 28 February 2012 (EST)
