Talk:Hannah Claydon: Difference between revisions
Loose cannon (talk | contribs) (reply to TaliaShepardFan) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I don't believe everything I read whether the source be a newspaper, porn magazine or erotic web-site. However, some sources are more credible than others (put more effort into fact-checking, have much wider readership, libel lawyers reviewing articles, etc.) and while Hannah's tits look real to me, the Daily Mail was able to provide details for its claims such as the name of the surgeon and the type of surgery performed. [http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C Your link] does not in any way disprove this information so you should stop removing that content I added (pictures and images). | I don't believe everything I read whether the source be a newspaper, porn magazine or erotic web-site. However, some sources are more credible than others (put more effort into fact-checking, have much wider readership, libel lawyers reviewing articles, etc.) and while Hannah's tits look real to me, the Daily Mail was able to provide details for its claims such as the name of the surgeon and the type of surgery performed. [http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C Your link] does not in any way disprove this information so you should stop removing that content I added (pictures and images). | ||
Sorry, dude! | : Sorry, dude! But you are wrong, look at her Onlytease-Site: http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C {{unsigned|TaliaShepardFan|15 March 2011}} | ||
But you are wrong, look at her Onlytease-Site: | |||
http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C | :: I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are acting in good faith but rather than repeat myself, I'll ask you to actually read what I wrote above. If you disagree with what I wrote, then please feel free to put forward a constructive counter argument. --[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] 17:55, 20 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:55, 20 March 2011
Removing Information
@TaliaShepardFan, I've already politely asked that you discuss article edits here before carelessly removing my edits and replacing with badly formatted Wiki markup. I spent a lot of time researching information on Hannah and improving this article. Please stop removing the information I added.
Natural Tits?
I don't believe everything I read whether the source be a newspaper, porn magazine or erotic web-site. However, some sources are more credible than others (put more effort into fact-checking, have much wider readership, libel lawyers reviewing articles, etc.) and while Hannah's tits look real to me, the Daily Mail was able to provide details for its claims such as the name of the surgeon and the type of surgery performed. Your link does not in any way disprove this information so you should stop removing that content I added (pictures and images).
- Sorry, dude! But you are wrong, look at her Onlytease-Site: http://de.onlytease.com/t1/Elena-C —Preceding unsigned comment added by TaliaShepardFan (talk • contribs) 15 March 2011. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
- I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are acting in good faith but rather than repeat myself, I'll ask you to actually read what I wrote above. If you disagree with what I wrote, then please feel free to put forward a constructive counter argument. --Loose cannon 17:55, 20 March 2011 (EDT)
