Talk:Dani Mathers: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
m (blank because i don't want war between members anymore)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== 2016 scandal ==


A member said the 2016 body scandal is irrevelant : "This is an "encyclopedia of big boobs", not Wikipedia. This isn't relevant.". Although some pages contain some kind of informations like [[Keeley Hazell]]'s page. If you don't want to read that, ok, but don't delete the discust. It's not mature.
[[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] August 7th, 2016.
== Answer ==
:Shall we go around posting everything Kim Kardashian has ever tweeted? How about reporting on all the nonsense Jenny McCarthy has every come out with about vaccines "causing autism"? That's a bigger scandal than Dani Mathers posting some picture on snapchat, but I don't see it mentioned on her page. Why? It's not relevant. [[User:JoeBethersonton|JoeBethersonton]] ([[User talk:JoeBethersonton|talk]]) 13:38, 8 August 2016 (EDT)
== Answer 2 ==
It's not up to you to delete this kind of information.I will be crazy with your bad behaviour. If your don't want to read that, just skip that. Please STOP !!!!!!
The moderator warned you about that yesterday and you're still doing your bad stuff.

Latest revision as of 15:09, 13 August 2016