Talk:Dani Mathers: Difference between revisions

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (blank because i don't want war between members anymore)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== 2016 scandal ==


A member said the 2016 body scandal is irrevelant : "This is an "encyclopedia of big boobs", not Wikipedia. This isn't relevant.". Although some pages contain some kind of informations like [[Keeley Hazell]]'s page. If you don't want to read that, ok, but don't delete the discust. It's not mature.
[[User:Athanatophobos|Athanatophobos]] August 7th, 2016.
:Shall we go around posting everything Kim Kardashian has ever tweeted? How about reporting on all the nonsense Jenny McCarthy has every come out with about vaccines "causing autism"? That's a bigger scandal than Dani Mathers posting some picture on snapchat, but I don't see it mentioned on her page. Why? It's not relevant. [[User:JoeBethersonton|JoeBethersonton]] ([[User talk:JoeBethersonton|talk]]) 13:38, 8 August 2016 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 15:09, 13 August 2016