User talk:TaliaShepardFan - Revision history

The Honorable: /* Blocked */ new section

2011-03-24T01:03:11Z

Blocked: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 24 March 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:

	: If you continue to remove verifiable information without explaining why, you will be blocked from editing. [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 19:48, 20 March 2011 (EDT)		: If you continue to remove verifiable information without explaining why, you will be blocked from editing. [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 19:48, 20 March 2011 (EDT)

			== Blocked ==

			You've been blocked for a week for being uncooperative in dealing with other editors. [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 21:03, 23 March 2011 (EDT)

The Honorable at 23:48, 20 March 2011

2011-03-20T23:48:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 20 March 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:

	: Despite all my attempts on the relevant Talk pages to discuss your removal of information, you continue to remove the researched and well-referenced information that I had added on both these models. I can only conclude that you have no interest in discussing the accuracy and/or reliability of the information in question and would rather persist in a pointless war of attrition. --[[User:Loose cannon\|Loose cannon]] 19:17, 20 March 2011 (EDT)		: Despite all my attempts on the relevant Talk pages to discuss your removal of information, you continue to remove the researched and well-referenced information that I had added on both these models. I can only conclude that you have no interest in discussing the accuracy and/or reliability of the information in question and would rather persist in a pointless war of attrition. --[[User:Loose cannon\|Loose cannon]] 19:17, 20 March 2011 (EDT)

			: If you continue to remove verifiable information without explaining why, you will be blocked from editing. [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 19:48, 20 March 2011 (EDT)

Loose cannon: /* Natural / Enhanced Boobs */ giving up

2011-03-20T23:17:49Z

Natural / Enhanced Boobs: giving up

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 20 March 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	--[[User:Loose cannon\|Loose cannon]] 09:27, 15 March 2011 (EDT)		--[[User:Loose cannon\|Loose cannon]] 09:27, 15 March 2011 (EDT)

			: Despite all my attempts on the relevant Talk pages to discuss your removal of information, you continue to remove the researched and well-referenced information that I had added on both these models. I can only conclude that you have no interest in discussing the accuracy and/or reliability of the information in question and would rather persist in a pointless war of attrition. --[[User:Loose cannon\|Loose cannon]] 19:17, 20 March 2011 (EDT)

Loose cannon: Natural / Enhanced Boobs

2011-03-15T13:27:37Z

Natural / Enhanced Boobs

New page

== Natural / Enhanced Boobs ==
Hi, TaliaShepardFan, You've reverted two articles I recently edited ([[Hannah Claydon]] and [[Yurizan Beltran]]). In both cases, I provided verifiable evidence that both models in question had had breast augmentation surgery while your reversions had no evidence to back them up. If you think there's a problem with the edits, you should use the relevant talk page for that article. In fact, TylerDurden had already started a discussion on the [[Talk:Yurizan_Beltran]]. You should not revert other editors' edits without discussion, particularly if they've taken the time to do the research and provide good evidence. Such edits could be considered as vandalism.

After you reverted those two articles, I looked at some of your other edits and noticed that you often change the ''natural tits'' field to '''No''' without providing any evidence. The general rule of thumb for filling out the ''natural tits'' field in the Biobox is to leave it blank if we don't know (unless it's clearly obvious). If some other user-editable and/or unofficial source (FreeOnes, IMDB, blogs, thenude.eu) states that the breasts are natural or enhanced, it's no harm to use that information as it may have originally come from a good source in which cases you should cite your source. But if in doubt, leave it out.

--[[User:Loose cannon|Loose cannon]] 09:27, 15 March 2011 (EDT)