User talk:AsteroidJuice - Revision history

Squalla1: /* Abigail Ratchford */

2015-11-19T01:08:45Z

Abigail Ratchford

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 19 November 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Please refrain from reverting the entry to "Natural" and refer to the talk page for evidence on the fact that the model in question does have (rather obvious) implants. Unless you have superior evidence to the contrary, ''please'' do not change it back. —[[User:Squalla1\|Squalla1]] 10:44, 17 November 2015 (EST)		Please refrain from reverting the entry to "Natural" and refer to the talk page for evidence on the fact that the model in question does have (rather obvious) implants. Unless you have superior evidence to the contrary, ''please'' do not change it back. —[[User:Squalla1\|Squalla1]] 10:44, 17 November 2015 (EST)

			:Oh yeah, of course she has implants, that's how her boobs bounces like jelly [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMlGUZ1_j4A here], right? And also why doesn't even look perky enough like other enhanced boobs? --[[User:AsteroidJuice\|AsteroidJuice]] 04:28, 18 November 2015 (EST)

			::You do realize "enhanced" breasts have come a long way and may vary drastically in quality and appearance depending on surgeon skill, implant type and technique used? In other words, implants don't necessarily look unnatural to the untrained eye. More trained eyes, however, will easily spot the difference between [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPtm9qxktRc implants] and natural breasts like [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vevOWUe_x7Y these] or [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j6_y-AMtK4 these here] (huge fan of those, by the way!). See, that ''those'' "bounce like jelly" I can agree with. Ratchford's I would personally say bounce more like silicone implants ;)

			::Additionally, as already pointed out, I've provided further evidence of the implants on the model's [[Talk:Abigail Ratchford\|discussion page]]. These three photos [http://www.barnorama.com/wp-content/images/2012/03/abigail-ratchford3/02-abigail-ratchford3.jpg][https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xfp1/t51.2885-15/e15/10859955_1051900114826583_407874913_n.jpg][http://thedirty.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/php6HDrjs.jpg] very clearly show Abigail Ratchford before the implants. As you can see, there's more than enough evidence out there to classify her as "enhanced". I kindly request that you provide any evidence to the contrary on the model's talk page, if there is any. —[[User:Squalla1\|Squalla1]] 20:08, 18 November 2015 (EST)

Squalla1: /* Abigail Ratchford */ new section

2015-11-17T15:44:54Z

Abigail Ratchford: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 17 November 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Thx, [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 04:54, 4 July 2014 (EDT)		Thx, [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 04:54, 4 July 2014 (EDT)
	:Hi !<br>Yes, there are, like her official website, or PinupFiles etc... But in this case, look at the [[Talk:Leanne Crow\|talk page]] for PinupFiles, it is said that, even if it is an official source, informations on the models are often wrong. [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 10:44, 6 July 2014 (EDT)		:Hi !<br>Yes, there are, like her official website, or PinupFiles etc... But in this case, look at the [[Talk:Leanne Crow\|talk page]] for PinupFiles, it is said that, even if it is an official source, informations on the models are often wrong. [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 10:44, 6 July 2014 (EDT)

			== Abigail Ratchford ==

			Please refrain from reverting the entry to "Natural" and refer to the talk page for evidence on the fact that the model in question does have (rather obvious) implants. Unless you have superior evidence to the contrary, ''please'' do not change it back. —[[User:Squalla1\|Squalla1]] 10:44, 17 November 2015 (EST)

Gh0st: /* Leanne Crow */

2014-07-06T14:44:29Z

Leanne Crow

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 6 July 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Please stop undoing rhe revisions on [[Leanne Crow]]'s page, Lana's Big Boobs, Freeones, and other unofficial websites are NOT refs for natural or fake tits. Also, please read the [[Talk:Leanne Crow\|talk page]] where there is a huge discussion about the type of her boobs. No conclusion has been found.<br>		Please stop undoing rhe revisions on [[Leanne Crow]]'s page, Lana's Big Boobs, Freeones, and other unofficial websites are NOT refs for natural or fake tits. Also, please read the [[Talk:Leanne Crow\|talk page]] where there is a huge discussion about the type of her boobs. No conclusion has been found.<br>
	Thx, [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 04:54, 4 July 2014 (EDT)		Thx, [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 04:54, 4 July 2014 (EDT)
			:Hi !<br>Yes, there are, like her official website, or PinupFiles etc... But in this case, look at the [[Talk:Leanne Crow\|talk page]] for PinupFiles, it is said that, even if it is an official source, informations on the models are often wrong. [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 10:44, 6 July 2014 (EDT)

Gh0st: /* Leanne Crow */

2014-07-04T08:54:53Z

Leanne Crow

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 4 July 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Hi,<br>		Hi,<br>
	Please stop undoing rhe revisions on [[Leanne Crow]]'s page, Lana's Big Boobs is NOT ~~a ref~~ for natural or fake tits. Also, please read the [[Talk:Leanne Crow\|talk page]] where there is a huge discussion about the type of her boobs. No conclusion has been found.<br>		Please stop undoing rhe revisions on [[Leanne Crow]]'s page, Lana's Big Boobs, Freeones, and other unofficial websites are NOT refs for natural or fake tits. Also, please read the [[Talk:Leanne Crow\|talk page]] where there is a huge discussion about the type of her boobs. No conclusion has been found.<br>
	Thx, [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 04:54, 4 July 2014 (EDT)		Thx, [[User:Gh0st\|Gh0st]] 04:54, 4 July 2014 (EDT)

Gh0st: Leanne Crow

2014-07-04T08:54:19Z

Leanne Crow

New page

== Leanne Crow ==

Hi,<br>
Please stop undoing rhe revisions on [[Leanne Crow]]'s page, Lana's Big Boobs is NOT a ref for natural or fake tits. Also, please read the [[Talk:Leanne Crow|talk page]] where there is a huge discussion about the type of her boobs. No conclusion has been found.<br>
Thx, [[User:Gh0st|Gh0st]] 04:54, 4 July 2014 (EDT)