Talk:Main Page/Archive 1 - Revision history

The Honorable: Talk:Main Page moved to Talk:Main Page/Archive 1

2010-01-23T02:32:06Z

Talk:Main Page moved to Talk:Main Page/Archive 1

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:32, 23 January 2010
(No difference)

Dekkappai: Undo revision 129130 by The Truth 20102010 (Talk)

2010-01-02T04:15:25Z

Undo revision 129130 by The Truth 20102010 (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 2 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Jade~~ http://~~bbwxxxtreme~~.~~zocku~~.com/~~members~~/~~profile/12409/pictures/116376/2~~ is a ~~BBW~~ model, who has ~~recently relocated to Scarborough~~, UK, ~~following~~ an ~~allegation~~ of ~~child cruelty~~. ~~Scum~~.		Please use this talk page sparingly. It is for discussing topics which affect the entire Boobpedia project. Conversations about specific pages or categories should be carried out on their respective talk pages.

			== Two Articles that either need merging, or one needs to be deleted. ==

			As I have neither the capability or authority to delete an entire page, and I don't know how to merge them. I move that the [[Kianna]] and [[Kianna Dior]] pages either be merged or the stub article of [[Kianna]] be deleted.

			This affects more than one article, I believe it belongs here. [[User:DDrendar\|DDrendar]]

			* Merging articles is easy. Say you have two articles, "Jane D." and "Jane Von Doe," and everything should really be under "Jane Von Doe." Take any useful info from the "Jane D." article, add it to the "Jane Von Doe" article, and then replace the "Jane D." article with <nowiki>#REDIRECT [[Jane Von Doe]]</nowiki>. Voila, you've merged the articles. :) [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 15:24, 26 April 2008 (EDT)

			== Claimed Bust Size versus Apparent Bust Size ==

			I think we should add another category to bio box.... Apparent Bust. It could be agreed upon in the discussion of each. It is ridiculous to have a DDD saying she is a GG. Just because it says it somewhere referenceable makes it no more correct. Jennifer Love Hewitt could put DDD on her website... Would we list it just because of that. It probably should just be in the standard format of A-G, etc. Single letters only, so a DD is an 'E', a DDD is a 'F', a EE is an 'F', etc. I guess the only complicated part would be some people not realizing that smaller girls can have a larger cup size due to the small frame. I think we could work it out... Thoughts??

			For example http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Rebecca_Jessop Says "H" but I would say her apparent cup size is "E"..... [[User:Msjayhawk\|msjayhawk]] 16:06, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

			* Concerning DD=E: There already is a category for this, explaining the standardised Boobpedia bra size: {{cl\|bra size}}. Only single letters, each one converted by the bra size template.
			* The cup sizes in {{cl\|by cup size}} are organised that way too, implying that DDD = EE = F.
			* Concerning the H of Rebecca Jessop: To my eye she has more than just E. Maybe not H, but more than E. Which leads us to the next topic:
			* Concerning "apparent" bust size: There's no way of measuring this subjective impression. Articles would end up in endless editing wars, because everyone thinks the model has another cup size. And none of them is reliable. Encyclopedic content cannot contain assumptions or speculations, only facts. If a model says she has DDD, it's a fact that she said it. If this is really true, this is another question which can be discussed either on a talk page or in an article itself, if there are sources proving that the model lied or added a few Ds to appear more important.
			* ''"Jennifer Love Hewitt could put DDD on her website... Would we list it just because of that?"'' Yes, we would. Exactly. Perhaps with a comment in the article that this is unlikely, compared with other models proved to have a DDD cup. Double and triple cup letters are an American invention anyway. That's why I introduced {{cl\|bra size}}. It's comparable, although some countries may have slight differences in cup sizes (and every man who really knows a woman with a cup size larger than D or E knows that even the different bra manufacturers and brands have completely different sizes. Just go shopping with such a woman. In one shop she'll find a 34F that fits perfectly, in another a 36F or 34G or 34H, and in a shop with French bras just another size).

			: Regards

			: [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 17:33, 24 June 2008 (EDT)


			Hya Regarding the size of breasts

			I have to say I see many Ladies claim to be bigger than they are as a headline 40 H is much better than 40 DD.

			Bra size vary so much its unreal for example a normal everyday bra non underwired for me I would buy a 40 H to HH cup.

			Now when I buy beautiful lacy underwired bras I buy them in 38 to 40 J cup because they tend to be smaller cups in pretty bras.

			so when I add pics on my top ten amateur site do I say Secretchicks 40 H boobs or Secretchicks 30 J boobs ?? because I will fit in both bras lol

			Secretchick

			== Articles with new pictures & Busty women you may not know Sections ==

			How is the "Articles with new pictures" updated? In the past week, I've created a few articles which have newly uploaded pictures. But they were never on there. Why not?

			And how are the beautiful, busty women chosen for the "Busty women you may not know" section? Is it random or are they handpicked?

			:These rarley get updated.[[User:Apara\|Apara]] 17:24, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
			::Then the "Articles with new pictures" is very misleading. It should be merged with "Busty women you may not know" or removed altogether. Or, have it post up the articles with the latest photo uploads.[[User:Cost\|Cost]] 14:45, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
			::: In my opinion, the section "articles with new pictures" is not only misleading, but obsolete and should be deleted. It suggests that Boobpedia is a picture archive or a nice gallery with changing pictures every day. That's why we have trouble with massive picture uploaders sometimes. That's no wonder if even the front page encourages uploading new pictures all the time without expanding, developing and sourcing articles. [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 15:03, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
			::::That actually makes sense. I was wondering why there's so many pictures uploading the past month or 2. It could have to do something with it. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 18:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
			:While we're at this, I'm also getting a bit bored of seeing [[Alix Lakehurst]] as the featured article every time. --[[User:LikeMnatural\|LikeMnatural]] 01:38, 6 February 2009 (EST)

			==Yes But More! ==
			Boobpedia is an absolutely wonderful start, but the world needs us to broaden our scope. The time has come for sister sites like Asianpedia, Bootypedia, Vanillapedia, Fetishpedia, Gaypedia, etc. Ultimately the goal should be an all-encompassing Pornopedia, the information hub for porn collectors of all stripes. Right now, the needs of those collectors are only being served in a substandard manner by whatever info they can scrounge from message boards and pay sites. We need to harness that scrounging energy and convert it to article writing energy for Pornopedia! Please, Boobpedia, agree with me, and I will work hard for you.[[User:Pisomojado\|Pisomojado]] 01:34, 13 April 2009 (EDT)

The Truth 20102010: Replacing page with 'Jade http://bbwxxxtreme.zocku.com/members/profile/12409/pictures/116376/2 is a BBW model, who has recently relocated to Scarborough, UK, following an allegation of child cruelt...'

2010-01-02T04:00:45Z

Replacing page with 'Jade http://bbwxxxtreme.zocku.com/members/profile/12409/pictures/116376/2 is a BBW model, who has recently relocated to Scarborough, UK, following an allegation of child cruelt...'

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 2 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Please use this talk page sparingly. It is for discussing topics which affect the entire Boobpedia project. Conversations about specific pages or categories should be carried out on their respective talk pages.		Jade http://bbwxxxtreme.zocku.com/members/profile/12409/pictures/116376/2 is a BBW model, who has recently relocated to Scarborough, UK, following an allegation of child cruelty. Scum.

	~~== Two Articles that either need merging, or one needs to be deleted. ==~~

	As I have neither the capability or authority to delete an entire page, and I don't know how to merge them. I move that the [[Kianna]] and [[Kianna Dior]] pages either be merged or the stub article of [[Kianna]] be deleted.

	~~This affects more than one article, I believe it belongs here. [[User:DDrendar\|DDrendar]]~~

	* Merging articles is easy. Say you have two articles, "Jane D." and "Jane Von Doe," and everything should really be under "Jane Von Doe." Take any useful info from the "Jane D." article, add it to the "Jane Von Doe" article, and then replace the "Jane D." article with <nowiki>#REDIRECT [[Jane Von Doe]]</nowiki>. Voila, you've merged the articles. :) [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 15:24, 26 April 2008 (EDT)

	~~== Claimed Bust Size versus Apparent Bust Size ==~~

	I think we should add another category to bio box.... Apparent Bust. It could be agreed upon in the discussion of each. It is ridiculous to have a DDD saying she is a GG. Just because it says it somewhere referenceable makes it no more correct. Jennifer Love Hewitt could put DDD on her website... Would we list it just because of that. It probably should just be in the standard format of A-G, etc. Single letters only, so a DD is an 'E', a DDD is a 'F', a EE is an 'F', etc. I guess the only complicated part would be some people not realizing that smaller girls can have a larger cup size due to the small frame. I think we could work it out... Thoughts??

	~~For example~~ http://~~www~~.~~boobpedia~~.com/~~boobs~~/~~Rebecca_Jessop Says "H" but I would say her apparent cup size is "E"..... [[User:Msjayhawk\|msjayhawk]] 16:06, 24 June 2008 (EDT)~~

	* Concerning DD=E: There already is a ~~category for this, explaining the standardised Boobpedia bra size: {{cl\|bra size}}. Only single letters, each one converted by the bra size template.~~
	* The cup sizes in {{cl\|by cup size}} are organised that way too, implying that DDD = EE = F.
	* Concerning the H of Rebecca Jessop: To my eye she has more than just E. Maybe not H, but more than E. Which leads us to the next topic:
	* Concerning "apparent" bust size: There's no way of measuring this subjective impression. Articles would end up in endless editing wars, because everyone thinks the model ~~has another cup size. And none of them is reliable. Encyclopedic content cannot contain assumptions or speculations~~, ~~only facts. If a model says she~~ has DDD, it's a fact that she said it. If this is really true, this is another question which can be discussed either on a talk page or in an article itself, if there are sources proving that the model lied or added a few Ds to ~~appear more important.~~
	* ''"Jennifer Love Hewitt could put DDD on her website... Would we list it just because of that?"'' Yes, ~~we would. Exactly. Perhaps with a comment in the article that this is unlikely~~, ~~compared with other models proved to have a DDD cup. Double and triple cup letters are~~ an American invention anyway. That's why I introduced {{cl\|bra size}}. It's comparable, although some countries may have slight differences in cup sizes (and every man who really knows a woman with a cup size larger than D or E knows that even the different bra manufacturers and brands have completely different sizes. Just go shopping with such a woman. In one shop she'll find a 34F that fits perfectly, in another a 36F or 34G or 34H, and in a shop with French bras just another size).

	~~: Regards~~

	~~: [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 17:33, 24 June 2008 (EDT)~~


	~~Hya Regarding the size~~ of ~~breasts~~

	~~I have to say I see many Ladies claim to be bigger than they are as a headline 40 H is much better than 40 DD.~~

	~~Bra size vary so much its unreal for example a normal everyday bra non underwired for me I would buy a 40 H to HH cup.~~

	~~Now when I buy beautiful lacy underwired bras I buy them in 38 to 40 J cup because they tend to be smaller cups in pretty bras.~~

	~~so when I add pics on my top ten amateur site do I say Secretchicks 40 H boobs or Secretchicks 30 J boobs ?? because I will fit in both bras lol~~

	~~Secretchick~~

	~~== Articles with new pictures & Busty women you may not know Sections ==~~

	~~How is the "Articles with new pictures" updated? In the past week, I've created a few articles which have newly uploaded pictures. But they were never on there. Why not?~~

	~~And how are the beautiful, busty women chosen for the "Busty women you may not know" section? Is it random or are they handpicked?~~

	~~:These rarley get updated~~.~~[[User:Apara\|Apara]] 17:24, 28 August 2008 (EDT)~~
	~~::Then the "Articles with new pictures" is very misleading~~. ~~It should be merged with "Busty women you may not know" or removed altogether. Or, have it post up the articles with the latest photo uploads.[[User:Cost\|Cost]] 14:45, 9 October 2008 (EDT)~~
	::: In my opinion, the section "articles with new pictures" is not only misleading, but obsolete and should be deleted. It suggests that Boobpedia is a picture archive or a nice gallery with changing pictures every day. That's why we have trouble with massive picture uploaders sometimes. That's no wonder if even the front page encourages uploading new pictures all the time without expanding, developing and sourcing articles. [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 15:03, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
	~~::::That actually makes sense. I was wondering why there's so many pictures uploading the past month or 2. It could have to do something with it. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 18:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)~~
	~~:While we're at this, I'm also getting a bit bored of seeing [[Alix Lakehurst]] as the featured article every time. --[[User:LikeMnatural\|LikeMnatural]] 01:38, 6 February 2009 (EST)~~

	~~==Yes But More! ==~~
	Boobpedia is an absolutely wonderful start, but the world needs us to broaden our scope. The time has come for sister sites like Asianpedia, Bootypedia, Vanillapedia, Fetishpedia, Gaypedia, etc. Ultimately the goal should be an all-encompassing Pornopedia, the information hub for porn collectors of all stripes. Right now, the needs of those collectors are only being served in a substandard manner by whatever info they can scrounge from message boards and pay sites. We need to harness that scrounging energy and convert it to article writing energy for Pornopedia! Please, Boobpedia, agree with me, and I will work hard for you.[[User:Pisomojado\|Pisomojado]] 01:34, 13 April 2009 (EDT)

Pisomojado at 05:34, 13 April 2009

2009-04-13T05:34:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 13 April 2009
Line 49:		Line 49:
	::::That actually makes sense. I was wondering why there's so many pictures uploading the past month or 2. It could have to do something with it. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 18:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)		::::That actually makes sense. I was wondering why there's so many pictures uploading the past month or 2. It could have to do something with it. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 18:02, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
	:While we're at this, I'm also getting a bit bored of seeing [[Alix Lakehurst]] as the featured article every time. --[[User:LikeMnatural\|LikeMnatural]] 01:38, 6 February 2009 (EST)		:While we're at this, I'm also getting a bit bored of seeing [[Alix Lakehurst]] as the featured article every time. --[[User:LikeMnatural\|LikeMnatural]] 01:38, 6 February 2009 (EST)

			==Yes But More! ==
			Boobpedia is an absolutely wonderful start, but the world needs us to broaden our scope. The time has come for sister sites like Asianpedia, Bootypedia, Vanillapedia, Fetishpedia, Gaypedia, etc. Ultimately the goal should be an all-encompassing Pornopedia, the information hub for porn collectors of all stripes. Right now, the needs of those collectors are only being served in a substandard manner by whatever info they can scrounge from message boards and pay sites. We need to harness that scrounging energy and convert it to article writing energy for Pornopedia! Please, Boobpedia, agree with me, and I will work hard for you.[[User:Pisomojado\|Pisomojado]] 01:34, 13 April 2009 (EDT)

LikeMnatural: /* Articles with new pictures & Busty women you may not know Sections */

2009-02-06T06:38:17Z