Talk:Ilsa - Revision history

The Honorable at 02:36, 13 January 2008

2008-01-13T02:36:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 13 January 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	: Even more so, the fictional characters category itself claims that when it comes to real actresses, the category may inlude only ''"busty film/television roles portrayed by non-busty actresses."'' -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:20, 12 January 2008 (EST)		: Even more so, the fictional characters category itself claims that when it comes to real actresses, the category may inlude only ''"busty film/television roles portrayed by non-busty actresses."'' -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:20, 12 January 2008 (EST)

	:: You raise some good points. I'~~ve started a discussion at [[Category talk:Fictional characters]] with my thoughts; anyone else is welcome to contribute as well~~. ~~As for~~ Ilsa~~, since she~~ has only been played by ~~one person AFAIK, I'm going to merge this article with~~ [[Dyanne Thorne]]'s article. [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 21:26, 12 January 2008 (EST)		:: You raise some good points. I would say that, if Ilsa had been played by multiple people, and Ilsa's bustiness was an important character attribute, then an article just about Ilsa would be fine. But since Ilsa has only been played by [[Dyanne Thorne]] (I think), anything about Ilsa can go in Thorne's article. [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 21:36, 12 January 2008 (EST)

The Honorable at 02:26, 13 January 2008

2008-01-13T02:26:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 13 January 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Even more so, the fictional characters category itself claims that when it comes to real actresses, the category may inlude only ''"busty film/television roles portrayed by non-busty actresses."'' -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:20, 12 January 2008 (EST)		: Even more so, the fictional characters category itself claims that when it comes to real actresses, the category may inlude only ''"busty film/television roles portrayed by non-busty actresses."'' -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:20, 12 January 2008 (EST)

			:: You raise some good points. I've started a discussion at [[Category talk:Fictional characters]] with my thoughts; anyone else is welcome to contribute as well. As for Ilsa, since she has only been played by one person AFAIK, I'm going to merge this article with [[Dyanne Thorne]]'s article. [[User:The Honorable\|The Honorable]] 21:26, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Biguns: /* What is the point of this article? */

2008-01-12T20:21:03Z

What is the point of this article?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 12 January 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I think fictional characters should basically mean fictional women. That is, women who are either animated or having prop breasts (i.e. not the actress' own breasts). -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:13, 12 January 2008 (EST)		I think fictional characters should basically mean fictional women. That is, women who are either animated or having prop breasts (i.e. not the actress' own breasts). -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:13, 12 January 2008 (EST)

	:: Even more so, the fictional characters category itself claims that when it comes to real actresses, the category may inlude only ''"busty film/television roles portrayed by non-busty actresses."'' -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:20, 12 January 2008 (EST)		: Even more so, the fictional characters category itself claims that when it comes to real actresses, the category may inlude only ''"busty film/television roles portrayed by non-busty actresses."'' -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:20, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Biguns: /* What is the point of this article? */

2008-01-12T20:20:51Z

What is the point of this article?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 12 January 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I think fictional characters should basically mean fictional women. That is, women who are either animated or having prop breasts (i.e. not the actress' own breasts). -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:13, 12 January 2008 (EST)		I think fictional characters should basically mean fictional women. That is, women who are either animated or having prop breasts (i.e. not the actress' own breasts). -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:13, 12 January 2008 (EST)

			:: Even more so, the fictional characters category itself claims that when it comes to real actresses, the category may inlude only ''"busty film/television roles portrayed by non-busty actresses."'' -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 15:20, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Biguns: What is the point of this article?

2008-01-12T20:13:51Z

What is the point of this article?

New page

== What is the point of this article? ==

Seeing Ilsa's breasts are just the actress', what does this article add that isn't already mentioned in the actress' own article? Are there plans to open up articles for every nude character on film? If so, you should know Ilsa was just topless and for no longer than seconds in each of these movies...

I think fictional characters should basically mean fictional women. That is, women who are either animated or having prop breasts (i.e. not the actress' own breasts). -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 15:13, 12 January 2008 (EST)