Talk:Fuko - Revision history

Ikki: /* Body type */ new section

2017-03-05T05:45:20Z

Body type: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 5 March 2017
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:::And besides legal definitions, social pressures come into play. I was reading the blog of one of these guys-- either the TT administrator or [[Cinema Unit GAS]]-- where he was reporting that his property was being vandalized by locals who didn't approve of what he was doing-- legal though it may be... This sort of thing led to ''Maichnichi Shimbun'' shutting down a column which translated Japanese tabloid articles into English. All "legal" according to the law, but the social pressures (and threats) said otherwise. Anyway, I agree it's a very iffy sentence, and I'll remove it when I get around to re-working the article. I wouldn't object if someone else deleted it either, as unsourced. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:07, 14 January 2009 (EST)		:::And besides legal definitions, social pressures come into play. I was reading the blog of one of these guys-- either the TT administrator or [[Cinema Unit GAS]]-- where he was reporting that his property was being vandalized by locals who didn't approve of what he was doing-- legal though it may be... This sort of thing led to ''Maichnichi Shimbun'' shutting down a column which translated Japanese tabloid articles into English. All "legal" according to the law, but the social pressures (and threats) said otherwise. Anyway, I agree it's a very iffy sentence, and I'll remove it when I get around to re-working the article. I wouldn't object if someone else deleted it either, as unsourced. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:07, 14 January 2009 (EST)
	:::Oh, also-- the media stir caused by the Fuko photos at TT were probably more due to the fact that it was evidence she had been working at a Soapland under the age of 18. (Legal or not, I'm not sure, but I think I've read that it's not.) [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:12, 14 January 2009 (EST)		:::Oh, also-- the media stir caused by the Fuko photos at TT were probably more due to the fact that it was evidence she had been working at a Soapland under the age of 18. (Legal or not, I'm not sure, but I think I've read that it's not.) [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:12, 14 January 2009 (EST)

			== Body type ==

			She's not curvy anymore, rather slim.

			--[[User:Ikki\|Ikki]] ([[User talk:Ikki\|talk]]) 00:45, 5 March 2017 (EST)

Dekkappai: /* Age */ more

2009-01-14T23:12:45Z

Age: more

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 14 January 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:::And besides legal definitions, social pressures come into play. I was reading the blog of one of these guys-- either the TT administrator or [[Cinema Unit GAS]]-- where he was reporting that his property was being vandalized by locals who didn't approve of what he was doing-- legal though it may be... This sort of thing led to ''Maichnichi Shimbun'' shutting down a column which translated Japanese tabloid articles into English. All "legal" according to the law, but the social pressures (and threats) said otherwise. Anyway, I agree it's a very iffy sentence, and I'll remove it when I get around to re-working the article. I wouldn't object if someone else deleted it either, as unsourced. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:07, 14 January 2009 (EST)		:::And besides legal definitions, social pressures come into play. I was reading the blog of one of these guys-- either the TT administrator or [[Cinema Unit GAS]]-- where he was reporting that his property was being vandalized by locals who didn't approve of what he was doing-- legal though it may be... This sort of thing led to ''Maichnichi Shimbun'' shutting down a column which translated Japanese tabloid articles into English. All "legal" according to the law, but the social pressures (and threats) said otherwise. Anyway, I agree it's a very iffy sentence, and I'll remove it when I get around to re-working the article. I wouldn't object if someone else deleted it either, as unsourced. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:07, 14 January 2009 (EST)
			:::Oh, also-- the media stir caused by the Fuko photos at TT were probably more due to the fact that it was evidence she had been working at a Soapland under the age of 18. (Legal or not, I'm not sure, but I think I've read that it's not.) [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:12, 14 January 2009 (EST)

Dekkappai: /* Age */ r

2009-01-14T23:07:52Z

Age: r

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 14 January 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:

	::It's true that TT may have voluntarily pulled the set rather than because of any law, but the fact is that "underaged" is a legal term when it comes down to it. To most Americans it means 18 (and even this perception is hardly accurate), but it means very different things in other cultures.[[User:Triplanetary\|Triplanetary]] 13:50, 14 January 2009 (EST)		::It's true that TT may have voluntarily pulled the set rather than because of any law, but the fact is that "underaged" is a legal term when it comes down to it. To most Americans it means 18 (and even this perception is hardly accurate), but it means very different things in other cultures.[[User:Triplanetary\|Triplanetary]] 13:50, 14 January 2009 (EST)

			:::And besides legal definitions, social pressures come into play. I was reading the blog of one of these guys-- either the TT administrator or [[Cinema Unit GAS]]-- where he was reporting that his property was being vandalized by locals who didn't approve of what he was doing-- legal though it may be... This sort of thing led to ''Maichnichi Shimbun'' shutting down a column which translated Japanese tabloid articles into English. All "legal" according to the law, but the social pressures (and threats) said otherwise. Anyway, I agree it's a very iffy sentence, and I'll remove it when I get around to re-working the article. I wouldn't object if someone else deleted it either, as unsourced. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 18:07, 14 January 2009 (EST)

Triplanetary: /* Age */

2009-01-14T18:50:10Z

Age

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 14 January 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:This article can certainly be improved and sourced better. It was written when she first appeared on the scene, and their was next-to-nothing to find on her. A lot of speculation was involved. But you seem to be reading even more speculation into the article. I see no mention of law-- either U.S. or Japanese-- in the article. Japanese and U.S. laws and society are alternately more conservative and more liberal than each other on differing points. Tokyo Topless immediately removed the pictures and blocked them from archives-- a rare action for them-- and when the pictures were re-discovered, post-Fuko-debut, they caused a bit of a stir in the Japanese media ([http://image.blog.livedoor.jp/tvmania/imgs/4/a/4ab72968.jpg here] for example). I see no real reason to change this sentence. But since it's speculation, it will probably be removed whenever the article is rewritten and sourced better. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 13:47, 14 January 2009 (EST)		:This article can certainly be improved and sourced better. It was written when she first appeared on the scene, and their was next-to-nothing to find on her. A lot of speculation was involved. But you seem to be reading even more speculation into the article. I see no mention of law-- either U.S. or Japanese-- in the article. Japanese and U.S. laws and society are alternately more conservative and more liberal than each other on differing points. Tokyo Topless immediately removed the pictures and blocked them from archives-- a rare action for them-- and when the pictures were re-discovered, post-Fuko-debut, they caused a bit of a stir in the Japanese media ([http://image.blog.livedoor.jp/tvmania/imgs/4/a/4ab72968.jpg here] for example). I see no real reason to change this sentence. But since it's speculation, it will probably be removed whenever the article is rewritten and sourced better. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 13:47, 14 January 2009 (EST)

	::It's true that TT may have voluntarily pulled the set rather than because of any law, but the fact is that "underaged" is a legal term when it comes down to it. To most Americans it means 18 (and even this perception is hardly accurate), but it means very different things in other cultures.		::It's true that TT may have voluntarily pulled the set rather than because of any law, but the fact is that "underaged" is a legal term when it comes down to it. To most Americans it means 18 (and even this perception is hardly accurate), but it means very different things in other cultures.[[User:Triplanetary\|Triplanetary]] 13:50, 14 January 2009 (EST)

Triplanetary: /* Age */

2009-01-14T18:49:55Z

Age

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 14 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:This article can certainly be improved and sourced better. It was written when she first appeared on the scene, and their was next-to-nothing to find on her. A lot of speculation was involved. But you seem to be reading even more speculation into the article. I see no mention of law-- either U.S. or Japanese-- in the article. Japanese and U.S. laws and society are alternately more conservative and more liberal than each other on differing points. Tokyo Topless immediately removed the pictures and blocked them from archives-- a rare action for them-- and when the pictures were re-discovered, post-Fuko-debut, they caused a bit of a stir in the Japanese media ([http://image.blog.livedoor.jp/tvmania/imgs/4/a/4ab72968.jpg here] for example). I see no real reason to change this sentence. But since it's speculation, it will probably be removed whenever the article is rewritten and sourced better. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 13:47, 14 January 2009 (EST)		:This article can certainly be improved and sourced better. It was written when she first appeared on the scene, and their was next-to-nothing to find on her. A lot of speculation was involved. But you seem to be reading even more speculation into the article. I see no mention of law-- either U.S. or Japanese-- in the article. Japanese and U.S. laws and society are alternately more conservative and more liberal than each other on differing points. Tokyo Topless immediately removed the pictures and blocked them from archives-- a rare action for them-- and when the pictures were re-discovered, post-Fuko-debut, they caused a bit of a stir in the Japanese media ([http://image.blog.livedoor.jp/tvmania/imgs/4/a/4ab72968.jpg here] for example). I see no real reason to change this sentence. But since it's speculation, it will probably be removed whenever the article is rewritten and sourced better. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 13:47, 14 January 2009 (EST)

			::It's true that TT may have voluntarily pulled the set rather than because of any law, but the fact is that "underaged" is a legal term when it comes down to it. To most Americans it means 18 (and even this perception is hardly accurate), but it means very different things in other cultures.

Dekkappai: /* Age */ r

2009-01-14T18:47:17Z

Age: r

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 14 January 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:

	This is BS. 17 is not "under-aged" under Japanese law. I know people like to pretend that the entire world is subject to American law, but it's not, and girls a lot younger than 17 have been photographed topless in Japan. [[User:Triplanetary\|Triplanetary]] 10:51, 14 January 2009 (EST)		This is BS. 17 is not "under-aged" under Japanese law. I know people like to pretend that the entire world is subject to American law, but it's not, and girls a lot younger than 17 have been photographed topless in Japan. [[User:Triplanetary\|Triplanetary]] 10:51, 14 January 2009 (EST)

			:This article can certainly be improved and sourced better. It was written when she first appeared on the scene, and their was next-to-nothing to find on her. A lot of speculation was involved. But you seem to be reading even more speculation into the article. I see no mention of law-- either U.S. or Japanese-- in the article. Japanese and U.S. laws and society are alternately more conservative and more liberal than each other on differing points. Tokyo Topless immediately removed the pictures and blocked them from archives-- a rare action for them-- and when the pictures were re-discovered, post-Fuko-debut, they caused a bit of a stir in the Japanese media ([http://image.blog.livedoor.jp/tvmania/imgs/4/a/4ab72968.jpg here] for example). I see no real reason to change this sentence. But since it's speculation, it will probably be removed whenever the article is rewritten and sourced better. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 13:47, 14 January 2009 (EST)

Triplanetary: New section: Age

2009-01-14T15:51:17Z

New section: Age

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 14 January 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:It's been long-anticipated :-) Personally, I'd be happy with just nude shots, but if it has to be AV, so be it... I'm holding off adding her to the AV actress list till I see some actual photographic evidence (did see a brief clip)-- or until it comes out in February. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 22:44, 8 January 2009 (EST)		:It's been long-anticipated :-) Personally, I'd be happy with just nude shots, but if it has to be AV, so be it... I'm holding off adding her to the AV actress list till I see some actual photographic evidence (did see a brief clip)-- or until it comes out in February. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 22:44, 8 January 2009 (EST)
	::I noticed it 20 mins go, when I was looking at torrents of Japanese AV videos. I saw that cover and didn't believe it until now. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:47, 8 January 2009 (EST)		::I noticed it 20 mins go, when I was looking at torrents of Japanese AV videos. I saw that cover and didn't believe it until now. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:47, 8 January 2009 (EST)

			== Age ==

			"Currently, she is no longer listed at the site, no doubt because, if either of the years of birth is correct, she was under-aged at the time these photos were taken"

			This is BS. 17 is not "under-aged" under Japanese law. I know people like to pretend that the entire world is subject to American law, but it's not, and girls a lot younger than 17 have been photographed topless in Japan. [[User:Triplanetary\|Triplanetary]] 10:51, 14 January 2009 (EST)

Apara at 03:47, 9 January 2009

2009-01-09T03:47:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 9 January 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:
	So she finally turned over huh? [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:33, 8 January 2009 (EST)		So she finally turned over huh? [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:33, 8 January 2009 (EST)
	:It's been long-anticipated :-) Personally, I'd be happy with just nude shots, but if it has to be AV, so be it... I'm holding off adding her to the AV actress list till I see some actual photographic evidence (did see a brief clip)-- or until it comes out in February. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 22:44, 8 January 2009 (EST)		:It's been long-anticipated :-) Personally, I'd be happy with just nude shots, but if it has to be AV, so be it... I'm holding off adding her to the AV actress list till I see some actual photographic evidence (did see a brief clip)-- or until it comes out in February. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 22:44, 8 January 2009 (EST)
			::I noticed it 20 mins go, when I was looking at torrents of Japanese AV videos. I saw that cover and didn't believe it until now. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:47, 8 January 2009 (EST)

Dekkappai: /* AV */ r

2009-01-09T03:44:41Z

AV: r

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:44, 9 January 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	== AV ==		== AV ==
	So she finally turned over huh? [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:33, 8 January 2009 (EST)		So she finally turned over huh? [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:33, 8 January 2009 (EST)
			:It's been long-anticipated :-) Personally, I'd be happy with just nude shots, but if it has to be AV, so be it... I'm holding off adding her to the AV actress list till I see some actual photographic evidence (did see a brief clip)-- or until it comes out in February. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 22:44, 8 January 2009 (EST)

Apara at 03:33, 9 January 2009

2009-01-09T03:33:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:33, 9 January 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:No-- that's not her. 2003 would have been too early for an appearance, and I've never seen "Mia" given as a first name. She did go by the name of "Love" before starting her gravure idol career. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 12:53, 18 March 2008 (EDT)		:No-- that's not her. 2003 would have been too early for an appearance, and I've never seen "Mia" given as a first name. She did go by the name of "Love" before starting her gravure idol career. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 12:53, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
	::It dawns on me that "Mia Fuko" is a pun ("Me-ah Fuck-oh"). Fuko's name, on the other hand, is just a happy coincidence. 風 (Fū) means "Fashion" or "Style" and 子 (ko) means "child" and is a common suffix for Japanese women's names. Whatever the name, this is certainly a fascinating subject. I think we owe it to Boobpedia to make this article better than the one at WP. I'll get to work on it and try to get it up to "Good" if not "Feature" status! Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 13:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)		::It dawns on me that "Mia Fuko" is a pun ("Me-ah Fuck-oh"). Fuko's name, on the other hand, is just a happy coincidence. 風 (Fū) means "Fashion" or "Style" and 子 (ko) means "child" and is a common suffix for Japanese women's names. Whatever the name, this is certainly a fascinating subject. I think we owe it to Boobpedia to make this article better than the one at WP. I'll get to work on it and try to get it up to "Good" if not "Feature" status! Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 13:36, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

			== AV ==
			So she finally turned over huh? [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:33, 8 January 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 9 January 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:
	So she finally turned over huh? [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:33, 8 January 2009 (EST)		So she finally turned over huh? [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:33, 8 January 2009 (EST)
	:It's been long-anticipated :-) Personally, I'd be happy with just nude shots, but if it has to be AV, so be it... I'm holding off adding her to the AV actress list till I see some actual photographic evidence (did see a brief clip)-- or until it comes out in February. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 22:44, 8 January 2009 (EST)		:It's been long-anticipated :-) Personally, I'd be happy with just nude shots, but if it has to be AV, so be it... I'm holding off adding her to the AV actress list till I see some actual photographic evidence (did see a brief clip)-- or until it comes out in February. [[User:Dekkappai\|Dekkappai]] 22:44, 8 January 2009 (EST)
			::I noticed it 20 mins go, when I was looking at torrents of Japanese AV videos. I saw that cover and didn't believe it until now. [[User:Apara\|Apara]] 22:47, 8 January 2009 (EST)