Talk:Aria Valentino - Revision history

Prophecy: /* Using age to determine birth year? */

2008-07-08T13:22:13Z

Using age to determine birth year?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 8 July 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Is is OK to use someone's age to determine her birth year?		Is is OK to use someone's age to determine her birth year?
	In this case, on her official website, she advertize herself as being 21 years old. Knowing this, we could say that she was born in 1987... Can we do that?--[[User:Jeremfg\|Jeremfg]] 22:52, 7 July 2008 (EDT)		In this case, on her official website, she advertize herself as being 21 years old. Knowing this, we could say that she was born in 1987... Can we do that?--[[User:Jeremfg\|Jeremfg]] 22:52, 7 July 2008 (EDT)

			: No, not at all.
			:* If she is 21 years old in 2008, her birth day already offers two options: born in 1987 (already had her birthday in 2008) or 1986 (birthday yet to come).
			:* The page is static. Unlike other typical model databases who have the original birthday, but only show the age, calculated from the current date every time you call the page, you cannot be sure when Aria's static page was created and if it's really updated when her age changes. So we cannot even rely on the 21.
			:* The guys at Big Tits Curvy Asses write whatever comes to their mind. I've followed a thread where many people from South America posted and who claim to have seen a few of the Big Tits Curvy Asses models - in completely different contries than stated in their profiles. Maybe Big Tits Curvy Asses wants to protect the models from being recognised in their real life, but it seems that they are all from the same country - and not spread all over South America. But this is not proven; as long as we do not have other proof, we have to believe what the websites say.
			: Solution: You could write a little section about her age in the article body and give a reason. I did this for [[Denise (bondage model)\|Denise]]. Her age was mentioned on a static page, so I wrote that her birth year can be xxxx or earlier, together with a reference and the access date. This is the only way. The reader has a clue what her age might be, but knows that it's only calculated/estimated and not really proven. In no case the estimated age should be entered in the biobox.

			: Regards

			: [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 09:22, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Jeremfg at 02:52, 8 July 2008

2008-07-08T02:52:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 8 July 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I bet it has already been discussed somewhere else...		I bet it has already been discussed somewhere else...
	Is is OK to use someone's age to determine her birth year?		Is is OK to use someone's age to determine her birth year?
	In this case, on her official website, she advertize herself as being 21 years old. Knowing this, we could say that she was born in 1987... Can we do that?		In this case, on her official website, she advertize herself as being 21 years old. Knowing this, we could say that she was born in 1987... Can we do that?--[[User:Jeremfg\|Jeremfg]] 22:52, 7 July 2008 (EDT)

Jeremfg: New section: Using age to determine birth year?

2008-07-08T02:51:55Z

New section: Using age to determine birth year?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 8 July 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:

	: [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)		: [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

			== Using age to determine birth year? ==

			I bet it has already been discussed somewhere else...
			Is is OK to use someone's age to determine her birth year?
			In this case, on her official website, she advertize herself as being 21 years old. Knowing this, we could say that she was born in 1987... Can we do that?

Prophecy: /* Natural or silicone? */

2008-05-08T01:25:56Z

Natural or silicone?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 8 May 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: Hm... I made this analogically to [[Anna Semenovich]]. Every time there's a doubt I write it down. But there's a difference I see now: In Anna's case, there is a source that doubts that her breasts are real. In Aria's case, it's me who says this.		: Hm... I made this analogically to [[Anna Semenovich]]. Every time there's a doubt I write it down. But there's a difference I see now: In Anna's case, there is a source that doubts that her breasts are real. In Aria's case, it's me who says this.

	: I read this kind in many other articles that only put the facts together and let the reader decide. That's why I posted pictures where the "scars" are relatively clear. I don't know... I thought Boobpedia should not just adopt anything that official websites write (above all when it's Big Tits Curvy Asses who are behind that site), but be critical where appropriate. At least ~~point~~ the reader's attention to facts.		: I read this kind in many other articles that only put the facts together and let the reader decide. That's why I posted pictures where the "scars" are relatively clear. I don't know... I thought Boobpedia should not just adopt anything that official websites write (above all when it's Big Tits Curvy Asses who are behind that site), but be critical where appropriate. At least direct the reader's attention to facts.

	: Concerning the word "now": You are right, I took it from her website, but "now" can be wrong tomorrow. But what about "currently lives in..." That's stated in many many articles. This would be as wrong as "now" if the model moves again. Or is there another reason why "now" is not good? Sometimes I do not detect slight nuances in the meaning of English words.		: Concerning the word "now": You are right, I took it from her website, but "now" can be wrong tomorrow. But what about "currently lives in..." That's stated in many many articles. This would be as wrong as "now" if the model moves again. Or is there another reason why "now" is not good? Sometimes I do not detect slight nuances in the meaning of English words.

Prophecy: /* Natural or silicone? */

2008-05-08T01:23:49Z

Natural or silicone?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:23, 8 May 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Doesn't this section belong here in the talk page rather than in the article? -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 20:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)		Doesn't this section belong here in the talk page rather than in the article? -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 20:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

			: Hm... I made this analogically to [[Anna Semenovich]]. Every time there's a doubt I write it down. But there's a difference I see now: In Anna's case, there is a source that doubts that her breasts are real. In Aria's case, it's me who says this.

			: I read this kind in many other articles that only put the facts together and let the reader decide. That's why I posted pictures where the "scars" are relatively clear. I don't know... I thought Boobpedia should not just adopt anything that official websites write (above all when it's Big Tits Curvy Asses who are behind that site), but be critical where appropriate. At least point the reader's attention to facts.

			: Concerning the word "now": You are right, I took it from her website, but "now" can be wrong tomorrow. But what about "currently lives in..." That's stated in many many articles. This would be as wrong as "now" if the model moves again. Or is there another reason why "now" is not good? Sometimes I do not detect slight nuances in the meaning of English words.

			: Concerning "large areolas": I already noticed that I often forget this category and that you seem to like them, because you add the category very often. As for Aria, I think these are really not large, they are really normal. If every model gets this category, what's left for "normal" or "small" areolas? Just my opinion...

			: Suggestion: You concede the silicone chapter and the line break to me and I concede the large areolas to you? :-)

			: Regards

			: [[User:Prophecy\|Prophecy]] 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Biguns: Natural or silicone?

2008-05-08T00:26:25Z

Natural or silicone?

New page

== Natural or silicone? ==

Doesn't this section belong here in the talk page rather than in the article? -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 20:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)