Biguns at 11:33, 27 March 2008

2008-03-27T11:33:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 27 March 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Now that there's a suitable image of her in here, we know her nipples were remarkably large. But is it not time for the world to finally learn her cup size? Is there an expert in the house?		Now that there's a suitable image of her in here, we know her nipples were remarkably large. But is it not time for the world to finally learn her cup size? Is there an expert in the house?

	If it helps, the link to vintage-erotica-forum.com also has a ~~full frontal~~ shot of her. Alas, it is black and white. -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 05:47, 19 August 2007 (PDT)		If it helps, the link to vintage-erotica-forum.com also has a front shot of her. Alas, it is black and white. -[[User:Biguns\|Biguns]] 05:47, 19 August 2007 (PDT)

	== Why "Shown bush" = yes? ==		== Why "Shown bush" = yes? ==

Hexvoodoo: 1 revision(s)

2007-11-11T23:02:49Z

1 revision(s)

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:02, 11 November 2007
(No difference)

Biguns at 22:48, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T22:48:46Z

New page

== The mystery of her cup size ==

Now that there's a suitable image of her in here, we know her nipples were remarkably large. But is it not time for the world to finally learn her cup size? Is there an expert in the house?

If it helps, the link to vintage-erotica-forum.com also has a full frontal shot of her. Alas, it is black and white. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 05:47, 19 August 2007 (PDT)

== Why "Shown bush" = yes? ==

She was barely shown topless in her films, so where did that aforementioned statement come from? -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 10:21, 19 August 2007 (PDT)

:the shown bush part is from the mrskin link for ''beneath the valley of the ultra vixens''. there is this decription for her scene "See it all--the muff, the duff, and the biggest, wobbliest, jiggliest pair of palookas you've ever seen--when Ann Marie mounts her man and does her thing, singing." someone who's viewed the scene should be able to verify the description --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 12:30, 12 September 2007 (PDT)

:: Do you see the bathtub screenshot? That's about the most she has shown. Only [[Kitten Natividad]] revealed anything other than breasts and {{PAGENAME}} barely revealed even that. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 15:48, 21 September 2007 (PDT)

== Why "Natural Tits" = no? ==

In the newspaper article (available on the article), she says herself that her breast are natural, in a 67" size, and she comes from a busty familly <small>-The preceding '''unsigned''' comment was added by [[User:67.68.219.228|67.68.219.228]] ([[User talk:67.68.219.228|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/67.68.219.228|contribs]]) 18:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC).</small>

Shouldn't we say: Yes instead of NO?

:the information about her tits being natural or not also came from her mrskin page, where she's listed as having fake breasts. there is no additional source and mrskin could be wrong. the newspaper article i consider more reliable, so i'll go change her boobs to natural. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 12:30, 12 September 2007 (PDT)

:: That article was when she was 21 - before breaking it into the movie business! You can see the way they're naturally sagging due to their size. One year later in ''Supervixens'', they were indeed sagging slightly but her appearance was less than 2 seconds. But some years later in ''Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens'', which was her real (and sadly only) breakthrough, they were standing up in 180°! I'm sure she enhanced them by then. I trust Mr. Skin in this one. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 15:48, 21 September 2007 (PDT)

Talk:Ann Marie - Revision history

Biguns at 11:33, 27 March 2008

Hexvoodoo: 1 revision(s)

Biguns at 22:48, 21 September 2007