https://www.boobpedia.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Help%3AHow_should_the_articles_be_written 2026-06-04T16:19:11Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.40.1 https://www.boobpedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=Help:How_should_the_articles_be_written&diff=64611&oldid=prev 2008-07-07T08:44:59Z

<p>Beginnings of achieving consensus on article layout</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>==General==<br /> <br /> Articles should be written from a neutral point of view, using factual, objective statements. A common tendency is to use subjective words such as &quot;hot&quot;, &quot;beautiful&quot;, &quot;best&quot;, and &quot;top&quot;. This happens because the writer is a fan of the article subject, but neutrality is compromised by writing from a fan&#039;s point of view. Passive phrases such as &quot;considered to be&quot; or &quot;considered by many to be&quot; are also warning signs that opinions are being passed as facts.<br /> <br /> Adult magazines and websites often try to talk up a model using vivid descriptions or cute language, and a lot of filler material. Boobpedia&#039;s purpose is not to arouse the reader or to sell a model, but to present information only. The editor should refrain from copying the promotional writing style.<br /> <br /> It is entirely acceptable to have a short, one-sentence article. An article can be as short as &quot;Jane Doe is an adult model&quot;, which is better than a longer article with lots of filler and no additional information.<br /> <br /> ==Formatting and layout==<br /> <br /> See the [[Help_talk:How_should_the_articles_be_written|discussion]] page for this topic.</div>

Drducker