Boobpedia:Editors room - Revision history

Honorable at 02:51, 6 June 2026

2026-06-06T02:51:54Z

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 * Is it possible to make the database searchable by several fields, ie G cups, and Fake breasts, and redhead, and 5'7?
 * Is it possible to add an "events" category that can be listed in calendar form?
 ==Photos in user pages==

The Honorable at 18:08, 10 September 2023

2023-09-10T18:08:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 10 September 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Model interviews ==		== Model interviews ==

	Do you have contact with a busty woman, or think that you can get in touch with one? She could be a model, pornstar, general celebrity, or amateur - being famous is not necessary. Boobpedia is always looking to interview busty women, so if you know a suitable subject, please ask her to email a Boobpedia [[administrator]]. You just might see her featured on Boobpedia!		Do you have contact with a busty woman, or think that you can get in touch with one? She could be a model, pornstar, general celebrity, or amateur - being famous is not necessary. Boobpedia is always looking to interview busty women, so if you know a suitable subject, please ask her to email a Boobpedia administrator. You just might see her featured on Boobpedia!

	==To do list for editors (feel free to add your own)==		==To do list for editors (feel free to add your own)==

Eduardo: /* Natural/Fake boob change */

2023-07-31T16:04:40Z

Natural/Fake boob change

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 31 July 2023
Line 104:		Line 104:
	==Natural/Fake boob change==		==Natural/Fake boob change==
	biobox should include boob enchantments. for example briana banks had a lovely saggy tits in very beginning of her career or latoya devi had big natural saggy boobs but both have fake tits now.[[User:Yesjulz\|Yesjulz]] ([[User talk:Yesjulz\|talk]]) 02:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)		biobox should include boob enchantments. for example briana banks had a lovely saggy tits in very beginning of her career or latoya devi had big natural saggy boobs but both have fake tits now.[[User:Yesjulz\|Yesjulz]] ([[User talk:Yesjulz\|talk]]) 02:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
			enchantments?

	==Unrealistic Categories==		==Unrealistic Categories==

Slupper: /* Identification */ i think only admins can create namespaces

2023-06-17T21:07:56Z

Identification: i think only admins can create namespaces

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 17 June 2023
Line 49:		Line 49:
	I went over all of the ID requests and tried to clean them up and simplify the process. I got rid of [[Boobpedia:Identification]] because it was only used once, and it was confusing to have a second different place to do things. Moved the only entry on it to its own page. I replaced the raw category text with [[Template:ID]] which is used like this: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This marks each request with the year it was opened, and allows to mark cold ones (dead links, info needed) and complete ones. I moved many cases to the cold category, and I used the templates to generate a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changed first. Now that it's all collected by template instead of a category, you can make future organizational changes in one place with the template.		I went over all of the ID requests and tried to clean them up and simplify the process. I got rid of [[Boobpedia:Identification]] because it was only used once, and it was confusing to have a second different place to do things. Moved the only entry on it to its own page. I replaced the raw category text with [[Template:ID]] which is used like this: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This marks each request with the year it was opened, and allows to mark cold ones (dead links, info needed) and complete ones. I moved many cases to the cold category, and I used the templates to generate a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changed first. Now that it's all collected by template instead of a category, you can make future organizational changes in one place with the template.

	I have one more suggestion, that we should move all the pages starting with ID ~~to their own~~ namespace ~~ID: instead~~, so they don't end putting their results into the regular searches or getting indexed by external search engines. I know that initially the ID requests were supposed to be the start of a new article, but almost none of existing ones are written like this. Instead they are like forum discussions, and a lot of their content has usernames and other material that we probably don't want to make so visible by having them in the main article namespace. It should be as simple as doing a move on each page, but I don't want to do this unless someone else thinks it's a good idea. If you do want to have an ID request article that is a searchable article stub, you could still put those in the main namespace too, the category doesn't discriminate against different namespaces. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 20:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)		I have one more suggestion, that we should move all the pages starting with ID out of the Main namespace, so they don't end putting their results into the regular searches or getting indexed by external search engines. I know that initially the ID requests were supposed to be the start of a new article, but almost none of existing ones are written like this. Instead they are like forum discussions, and a lot of their content has usernames and other material that we probably don't want to make so visible by having them in the main article namespace. It should be as simple as doing a move on each page, but I don't want to do this unless someone else thinks it's a good idea. If you do want to have an ID request article that is a searchable article stub, you could still put those in the main namespace too, the category doesn't discriminate against different namespaces. Maybe the existing "Talk:" namespace works for this, but a new "ID:" namespace might make it easier? - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 20:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	==Photos in user pages==		==Photos in user pages==

Slupper: /* Identification */ explain recent attempt at ID cleanup

2023-06-17T20:27:33Z

Identification: explain recent attempt at ID cleanup

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 17 June 2023
Line 47:		Line 47:
	::: Seems like, ID requests should all be (or all are) tagged with [[:Category:Identification_needed]], and this creates a list of pages similar to what is being suggested, except what is suggested, requires list maintenance. [[User:EditorsChoice\|EditorsChoice]] ([[User talk:EditorsChoice\|talk]]) 19:58, 22 August 2019 (EDT)		::: Seems like, ID requests should all be (or all are) tagged with [[:Category:Identification_needed]], and this creates a list of pages similar to what is being suggested, except what is suggested, requires list maintenance. [[User:EditorsChoice\|EditorsChoice]] ([[User talk:EditorsChoice\|talk]]) 19:58, 22 August 2019 (EDT)

	I went ~~through~~ all of ~~[[:Category:Identification needed]]~~ to ~~see if I could help identify anything~~. I ~~did make a few identifications, but I was frustrated by the state~~ of ~~things, so I tried to make it more consistent:~~		I went over all of the ID requests and tried to clean them up and simplify the process. I got rid of [[Boobpedia:Identification]] because it was only used once, and it was confusing to have a second different place to do things. Moved the only entry on it to its own page. I replaced the raw category text with [[Template:ID]] which is used like this: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This marks each request with the year it was opened, and allows to mark cold ones (dead links, info needed) and complete ones. I moved many cases to the cold category, and I used the templates to generate a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changed first. Now that it's all collected by template instead of a category, you can make future organizational changes in one place with the template.
	* Removed [[Boobpedia:Identification]] because it was ~~never really~~ used ~~in 10 years~~ and it ~~creates two separate places for the same thing. It had one duplicate ID request, which had~~ a ~~reply its OP may have never seen~~. ~~It had one unique ID request, which I moved~~ to ~~a new ID article~~ page ~~instead~~.
	* Every ID request that had dead links and not enough information to try to search for I ~~moved to~~ [[:~~Category:Identification needed cold case~~]].
	* Some of the ID articles had useful replies in their discussion pages, which ~~seemed to be ignored by OP or probably not seen by many users. I moved these into their main article where people can see them instead.~~
	* There were some categories (unsolved since year XXX, etc.) that did not help because they contain only 1 or no articles. I got rid of these.
	* Removed Identified category form regular articles that once started as ID requests, there were only 4 or 5 of these. It seems like ~~that was the intent when~~ this ~~site was new~~, ~~but~~ ID ~~requests do not become the basis of new articles anymore~~, ~~instead this category should just archive successful IDs?~~
	* Tried to update the ~~instructions list with a few more tips to help keep~~ it ~~cleaner.~~
	~~So, my goal~~ was ~~basically just that we should not waste people's time by having them open pages with no information they can help with. That's my main guiding principle here~~, ~~just make sure everything that is linked in that category is something we can actually try~~ to ~~help with. No empty categories. No pages with unusable information. If the~~ links ~~are dead~~, ~~the cold case category is fine as an archive, and if the OP ever comes back they can add~~ info and ~~put it back in the regular category.~~
	~~Sorry if this is stepping on toes~~. I ~~just wanted~~ to ~~put this~~ category ~~into a state where it's easier to help with. If someone tries clicking on a few articles~~ and the ~~first 3 are all dead links, they're probably just going~~ to ~~give up. The biggest suggestion I could make is somehow providing~~ a ~~list of the active pages, not in alphabetical order, but instead with the~~ most ~~recently edited~~ first. ~~That way~~ it ~~could be easier for people to check if their article had an update, and also see which ones are old and not worth revisiting at a glance. I don't know if there~~'s ~~an easy way for~~ a ~~wiki to do that~~, ~~maybe through some special search? I was thinking like a link to recent~~ changes~~, but it doesn't seem to have a category filter that could do this~~. ~~- [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)~~

	:Following up on this I thought of a way to accomplish that goal. I created [[Template:ID]] and used it to replace instances of the category tags with a template that takes a year: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This template makes it easier to maintain the by-year categories. It also allowed me to create a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changes first. I'm replacing all the existing uses of the 3 identification categories with the template, and once that's done it will be easier to make more systemic tweaks to this by editing the template instead of having to touch all the pages again. The per-year categories are probably mostly useful for trying to clean up the cold cases (which are also sorted to the bottom in those yearly lists). - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 06:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)		I have one more suggestion, that we should move all the pages starting with ID to their own namespace ID: instead, so they don't end putting their results into the regular searches or getting indexed by external search engines. I know that initially the ID requests were supposed to be the start of a new article, but almost none of existing ones are written like this. Instead they are like forum discussions, and a lot of their content has usernames and other material that we probably don't want to make so visible by having them in the main article namespace. It should be as simple as doing a move on each page, but I don't want to do this unless someone else thinks it's a good idea. If you do want to have an ID request article that is a searchable article stub, you could still put those in the main namespace too, the category doesn't discriminate against different namespaces. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 20:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	~~::One~~ more suggestion, we should ~~probably~~ move all the pages starting with ID to their own namespace, ID: so ~~that~~ they don't end up putting their results into the regular searches or getting indexed by external search engines. I know that initially the ID requests were supposed to be the start of a new article, but almost none of existing ones are written like this. Instead they are ~~basically just~~ forum discussions, and a lot of their content has usernames and other material that we probably don't want to make so visible by having them in the main article namespace. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 09:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	==Photos in user pages==		==Photos in user pages==

Slupper: /* Identification */ suggest using a separate namespace for ID

2023-06-17T09:37:43Z

Identification: suggest using a separate namespace for ID

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 17 June 2023
Line 58:		Line 58:

	:Following up on this I thought of a way to accomplish that goal. I created [[Template:ID]] and used it to replace instances of the category tags with a template that takes a year: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This template makes it easier to maintain the by-year categories. It also allowed me to create a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changes first. I'm replacing all the existing uses of the 3 identification categories with the template, and once that's done it will be easier to make more systemic tweaks to this by editing the template instead of having to touch all the pages again. The per-year categories are probably mostly useful for trying to clean up the cold cases (which are also sorted to the bottom in those yearly lists). - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 06:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)		:Following up on this I thought of a way to accomplish that goal. I created [[Template:ID]] and used it to replace instances of the category tags with a template that takes a year: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This template makes it easier to maintain the by-year categories. It also allowed me to create a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changes first. I'm replacing all the existing uses of the 3 identification categories with the template, and once that's done it will be easier to make more systemic tweaks to this by editing the template instead of having to touch all the pages again. The per-year categories are probably mostly useful for trying to clean up the cold cases (which are also sorted to the bottom in those yearly lists). - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 06:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

			::One more suggestion, we should probably move all the pages starting with ID to their own namespace, ID: so that they don't end up putting their results into the regular searches or getting indexed by external search engines. I know that initially the ID requests were supposed to be the start of a new article, but almost none of existing ones are written like this. Instead they are basically just forum discussions, and a lot of their content has usernames and other material that we probably don't want to make so visible by having them in the main article namespace. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 09:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	==Photos in user pages==		==Photos in user pages==

Slupper: /* Identification */ mention per-year use

2023-06-17T06:59:12Z

Identification: mention per-year use

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 17 June 2023
Line 57:		Line 57:
	Sorry if this is stepping on toes. I just wanted to put this category into a state where it's easier to help with. If someone tries clicking on a few articles and the first 3 are all dead links, they're probably just going to give up. The biggest suggestion I could make is somehow providing a list of the active pages, not in alphabetical order, but instead with the most recently edited first. That way it could be easier for people to check if their article had an update, and also see which ones are old and not worth revisiting at a glance. I don't know if there's an easy way for a wiki to do that, maybe through some special search? I was thinking like a link to recent changes, but it doesn't seem to have a category filter that could do this. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)		Sorry if this is stepping on toes. I just wanted to put this category into a state where it's easier to help with. If someone tries clicking on a few articles and the first 3 are all dead links, they're probably just going to give up. The biggest suggestion I could make is somehow providing a list of the active pages, not in alphabetical order, but instead with the most recently edited first. That way it could be easier for people to check if their article had an update, and also see which ones are old and not worth revisiting at a glance. I don't know if there's an easy way for a wiki to do that, maybe through some special search? I was thinking like a link to recent changes, but it doesn't seem to have a category filter that could do this. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	:Following up on this I thought of a way to accomplish that goal. I created [[Template:ID]] and used it to replace instances of the category tags with a template that takes a year: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This template makes it easier to maintain the by-year categories. It also allowed me to create a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changes first. I'm replacing all the existing uses of the 3 identification categories with the template, and once that's done it will be easier to make more systemic tweaks to this by editing the template instead of having to touch all the pages again. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 06:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)		:Following up on this I thought of a way to accomplish that goal. I created [[Template:ID]] and used it to replace instances of the category tags with a template that takes a year: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This template makes it easier to maintain the by-year categories. It also allowed me to create a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changes first. I'm replacing all the existing uses of the 3 identification categories with the template, and once that's done it will be easier to make more systemic tweaks to this by editing the template instead of having to touch all the pages again. The per-year categories are probably mostly useful for trying to clean up the cold cases (which are also sorted to the bottom in those yearly lists). - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 06:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	==Photos in user pages==		==Photos in user pages==

Slupper: /* Identification */ figured out a way to do it with a template

2023-06-17T06:58:09Z

Identification: figured out a way to do it with a template

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:58, 17 June 2023
Line 56:		Line 56:
	So, my goal was basically just that we should not waste people's time by having them open pages with no information they can help with. That's my main guiding principle here, just make sure everything that is linked in that category is something we can actually try to help with. No empty categories. No pages with unusable information. If the links are dead, the cold case category is fine as an archive, and if the OP ever comes back they can add info and put it back in the regular category.		So, my goal was basically just that we should not waste people's time by having them open pages with no information they can help with. That's my main guiding principle here, just make sure everything that is linked in that category is something we can actually try to help with. No empty categories. No pages with unusable information. If the links are dead, the cold case category is fine as an archive, and if the OP ever comes back they can add info and put it back in the regular category.
	Sorry if this is stepping on toes. I just wanted to put this category into a state where it's easier to help with. If someone tries clicking on a few articles and the first 3 are all dead links, they're probably just going to give up. The biggest suggestion I could make is somehow providing a list of the active pages, not in alphabetical order, but instead with the most recently edited first. That way it could be easier for people to check if their article had an update, and also see which ones are old and not worth revisiting at a glance. I don't know if there's an easy way for a wiki to do that, maybe through some special search? I was thinking like a link to recent changes, but it doesn't seem to have a category filter that could do this. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)		Sorry if this is stepping on toes. I just wanted to put this category into a state where it's easier to help with. If someone tries clicking on a few articles and the first 3 are all dead links, they're probably just going to give up. The biggest suggestion I could make is somehow providing a list of the active pages, not in alphabetical order, but instead with the most recently edited first. That way it could be easier for people to check if their article had an update, and also see which ones are old and not worth revisiting at a glance. I don't know if there's an easy way for a wiki to do that, maybe through some special search? I was thinking like a link to recent changes, but it doesn't seem to have a category filter that could do this. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

			:Following up on this I thought of a way to accomplish that goal. I created [[Template:ID]] and used it to replace instances of the category tags with a template that takes a year: <code><nowiki>{{ID\|2008}}, {{ID\|2008\|cold}}, {{ID\|2008\|done}}</nowiki></code>. This template makes it easier to maintain the by-year categories. It also allowed me to create a [[:Category:Identification needed recent changes\|recent changes style category]] for open ID requests sorted by most recent changes first. I'm replacing all the existing uses of the 3 identification categories with the template, and once that's done it will be easier to make more systemic tweaks to this by editing the template instead of having to touch all the pages again. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 06:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	==Photos in user pages==		==Photos in user pages==

Slupper: /* Identification */ use of Identify cateogry

2023-06-17T03:30:31Z

Identification: use of Identify cateogry

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 17 June 2023
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* Some of the ID articles had useful replies in their discussion pages, which seemed to be ignored by OP or probably not seen by many users. I moved these into their main article where people can see them instead.		* Some of the ID articles had useful replies in their discussion pages, which seemed to be ignored by OP or probably not seen by many users. I moved these into their main article where people can see them instead.
	* There were some categories (unsolved since year XXX, etc.) that did not help because they contain only 1 or no articles. I got rid of these.		* There were some categories (unsolved since year XXX, etc.) that did not help because they contain only 1 or no articles. I got rid of these.
			* Removed Identified category form regular articles that once started as ID requests, there were only 4 or 5 of these. It seems like that was the intent when this site was new, but ID requests do not become the basis of new articles anymore, instead this category should just archive successful IDs?
	* Tried to update the instructions list with a few more tips to help keep it cleaner.		* Tried to update the instructions list with a few more tips to help keep it cleaner.
	So, my goal was basically just that we should not waste people's time by having them open pages with no information they can help with. That's my main guiding principle here, just make sure everything that is linked in that category is something we can actually try to help with. No empty categories. No pages with unusable information. If the links are dead, the cold case category is fine as an archive, and if the OP ever comes back they can add info and put it back in the regular category.		So, my goal was basically just that we should not waste people's time by having them open pages with no information they can help with. That's my main guiding principle here, just make sure everything that is linked in that category is something we can actually try to help with. No empty categories. No pages with unusable information. If the links are dead, the cold case category is fine as an archive, and if the OP ever comes back they can add info and put it back in the regular category.

Slupper: /* Identification */ thought RC might work but it doesn't have a good filter

2023-06-17T03:06:29Z

Identification: thought RC might work but it doesn't have a good filter

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 17 June 2023
Line 54:		Line 54:
	* Tried to update the instructions list with a few more tips to help keep it cleaner.		* Tried to update the instructions list with a few more tips to help keep it cleaner.
	So, my goal was basically just that we should not waste people's time by having them open pages with no information they can help with. That's my main guiding principle here, just make sure everything that is linked in that category is something we can actually try to help with. No empty categories. No pages with unusable information. If the links are dead, the cold case category is fine as an archive, and if the OP ever comes back they can add info and put it back in the regular category.		So, my goal was basically just that we should not waste people's time by having them open pages with no information they can help with. That's my main guiding principle here, just make sure everything that is linked in that category is something we can actually try to help with. No empty categories. No pages with unusable information. If the links are dead, the cold case category is fine as an archive, and if the OP ever comes back they can add info and put it back in the regular category.
	Sorry if this is stepping on toes. I just wanted to put this category into a state where it's easier to help with. If someone tries clicking on a few articles and the first 3 are all dead links, they're probably just going to give up. The biggest suggestion I could make is somehow providing a list of the active pages, not in alphabetical order, but instead with the most recently edited first. That way it could be easier for people to check if their article had an update, and also see which ones are old and not worth revisiting at a glance. I don't know if there's an easy way for a wiki to do that, maybe through some special search? - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)		Sorry if this is stepping on toes. I just wanted to put this category into a state where it's easier to help with. If someone tries clicking on a few articles and the first 3 are all dead links, they're probably just going to give up. The biggest suggestion I could make is somehow providing a list of the active pages, not in alphabetical order, but instead with the most recently edited first. That way it could be easier for people to check if their article had an update, and also see which ones are old and not worth revisiting at a glance. I don't know if there's an easy way for a wiki to do that, maybe through some special search? I was thinking like a link to recent changes, but it doesn't seem to have a category filter that could do this. - [[User:Slupper\|Slupper]] ([[User talk:Slupper\|talk]]) 02:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

	==Photos in user pages==		==Photos in user pages==