Boobpedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:Apara

2009-07-21T07:32:06Z

Yorgos:

* [[User talk:Apara/2008|Archive 2008]]
==Chesty & Busty==
Thanks, Apara. I've read that, but I didn't come across anything where Chesty actually says Busty was an inspiration. I did see their names confused occasionally-- and even some that said they were the same person (which is obviously wrong). [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:31, 31 December 2008 (EST)
==ID==
Hi, Apara. That is [[Kira Namikaze]], one of [[Akira Takatsuki]]'s [[Cinema Unit GAS]] discoveries. She debuted with them in October 2006, made several videos at that studio, and has been working in other companies since working for [[Oppai label]] in June 2008. The DVD you linked to is for Moodyz, a major Japanese adult video company. [http://www.dmm.co.jp/digital/videoa/-/detail/=/cid=miad391/ Here] is a link with more info and screenshots on that DVD. Its title is ''Bomber Tits Tit-Fucking Female Professor'' (''Bakunyuu paizuri jokyoshi''). And [http://www.dmm.co.jp/digital/videoa/-/list/=/article=actress/id=20050/ here] is a page with other works by her. Strange that they leave out the Cinema Unit GAS DVDs though, since this is the site I usually use to research that company's output... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:46, 3 January 2009 (EST)

== Thanks ==

Hi Apara,

thanks for your message. It had escaped my attention that it was growing so bad. [[User:Prophecy|Prophecy]] 04:09, 4 January 2009 (EST)

== Question ==
Ahem... Sayonara, Eden... Question on [http://www.boobpedia.com/butler/index.php?title=Harumi_Nemoto&diff=94725&oldid=94675 this edit], Apara: You seem to have meant to change only the image, which is fine. But you also moved the References section and took out the Ja-Wiki link. That wasn't intentional, was it? I'll revert those changes. If then were intentional, let me know why. (The References at bottom is an agreed-upon standard, as far as I know; and I've been putting the Ja-wiki link at Japanese model articles as a standard.) Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 23:09, 6 January 2009 (EST)

== Comparison ==

Hi Apara,

thanks for your efforts. Linafay is very strange, she has two different faces, one as a fine art nude model and one as a porn amateur. I thought this might be her... [[User:Prophecy|Prophecy]] 16:42, 17 January 2009 (EST)

==4-5 images==
Hello.
Sorry, mate! I did not know this rule. I will take care!
Cheers!--[[User:Biff|Biff]] 21:17, 25 January 2009 (EST)

==B size==
Sorry again! It's a pity! They are beautiful! But, rule is rule. --[[User:Biff|Biff]] 16:13, 27 January 2009 (EST)
==Bettie Page==
Hi, Apara. She's not a big interest, but sure, I'm interested in all the classic models. And if we can put together a better article than WP's, I'm all for that. I'm supposed to have access to at least two books on her, but last time I checked, those two volumes were missing... I'll check again. Also, I'll look through the newspaper databases I've got access to. I'll send you the information if you want to do the writing. I've been working on [[Sakurako Kaoru]] for some time now, and haven't really even scratched the surface yet-- just sort of finished her adult video filmography yesterday. Anyway, good luck on the project. I'll chip in what I can. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 10:25, 8 February 2009 (EST)
:Hi, Apara. I see I've got access to several newspaper articles on Bettie-- mostly from the 2000s, but several from the '80s and '90s and even one from the '50s when she won some award. These are all in .PDF format. I don't think we can upload those here, so how would you like them sent? I could make .JPGs of them with screenshots, or I could copy the text in text format, though text from these .PDFs of old articles tends to have a lot of errors. It'll take a little time, but I'll get the info to you somehow. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:07, 10 February 2009 (EST)
::Hi again, Apara. I'm a little bit disappointed, because I thought I had a LOT of articles on her. Turns out the vast majority are on a biographical film made of her in 2006, and reviews of the books written about her. I did upload the 1954 picture, because that's of historical value, and should fit well into the article. It is [[:Image:Bettie Page - September 09, 1954.jpg]]. JPEGS might be a bit of a problem because many of these articles at 100% are larger than the screen. But I'll work it out-- Jpegs or text, where appropriate, and send it to you gradually. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:46, 10 February 2009 (EST)
:::Hi Apara-- Did you get the info I've sent? I've been a bit busy offline, and doing some non-BP work at WP in my spare time, so my work on Japanese subjects here has been piling up, and haven't sent everything I have on Bettie yet. But let me know if you've got it, and I'll send more later. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:11, 19 February 2009 (EST)
::::OK-- I'll send more when I get the chance-- probably this weekend. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:17, 20 February 2009 (EST)
==Kelly Shibari==
Right-- I was wondering... I asked the editor who made the changes-- they seem to be taken from Kelly herself, since they're in the first-person. If he cites the source, I'll integrate the additions into the old version. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:37, 4 March 2009 (EST)

== Priya Rai ==

There was another link to priyaraivideos.com in one of the references. I found the original source and substituted that, and all seems to work now. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 01:03, 12 March 2009 (EDT)

== Tattoo ==

Hi Apara,

I thought of this too a while ago and then again sometimes since then. I am not sure. There are some women with quite prominent tattoos (especially your niche of SuicideGirls), so I thought of adding this category too. But then I was not sure any more: What counts as tattooed woman? If you have a closer look, nowadays very very many women have a little tribal or a tiny star somewhere on their body, so I feared that a category like this could soon become overcrowded.

Finally I thought that this is not a real breast-related category, but this does not count - "Anal" and many other categories are not breast-related either.

So, the longer I think of it - yes, it's worth it. Imagine a visitor who is looking for a tattoed woman; a category like this could help him. I'll install it. [[User:Prophecy|Prophecy]] 13:43, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

: Here you are: {{cl|Tattoos}} [[User:Prophecy|Prophecy]] 13:53, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

== Pamela Green ==

She appears to have a healthy bust, and [http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0338220/bio Celebrity Sleuth] estimated she was a D-cup, so, sure. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 20:12, 18 May 2009 (EDT)

==Invitation==
Hi Apara, I've seen your work here at Boobpedia and I think it's great! I would like to invite you to have a look at another project that is more generic (not only big boobs). The site is [http://pornopedia.org Pornopedia.org]. Have a look and tell me what you think. You could help us with vintage, retro or pin up sections. You definetly are invited to contribute. Thanks for your time. --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 03:32, 21 July 2009 (EDT)

User talk:Prophecy

2009-05-25T08:57:53Z

Yorgos: /* Biobox new */

* [[User talk:Prophecy|Main talk page]]
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 1|Archive 1]] from 2008-04-12 to 2008-08-05
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 2|Archive 2]] from 2008-08-05 to 2008-12-07

== Fishnets ==
I've been noticing the uploading of fishnet clothing pictures. Some pin up article have pictures of them in fishnets. [[Lorraine Burnett]] and [[Marge Mellor]], come to mind.[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:10, 9 December 2008 (EST)
:Oh ok, well if you needed more, then you know where to look....[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:27, 9 December 2008 (EST)

== Movie Pages ==

For a few of the articles, I want to mention that the performer performed in the infamous pardory ''Who's Naylin' Paylin?.'' How do you make those pages? [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:37, 10 December 2008 (EST)
:Yes. I forgot to add that... [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:42, 10 December 2008 (EST)

== Booble Girls ==

A [[Boobpedia:Suggestions|request]] has been made for a [[:Template:DanniGirls|DanniGirls]]-type template for [[:Category:Booble Cover Girls|:Category:Booble Cover Girls]], if you're interested (and don't have any other projects you're working on :) ) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 22:09, 15 December 2008 (EST)

== Supporting Actresses and Sequels ==

What do we do with supporting actresses? Should we include them in the template or just the article? The two films that have this are ''[[Pirates]]'' and ''[[Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge]]''.

The latter is also the sequel to the former. Should I put it type=episode in the template for them?

[[User:Cost|Cost]] 13:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)
:Yeah, that's what I was planning on doing too. [[User:Cost|Cost]] 02:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)

== Since you started the article ==
You probably have something to say, [[Talk:Madonna]]. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 03:07, 4 January 2009 (EST)

==Micro Tits Ciccone==
Sure, but she has not looked like the black and white photo for almost 25 years, the new photo is what she looks like. Madonna is NOT a C and barely ever was, in her early days she was virtually flat chested. I have sent pics to an editor to show you what I mean. Cone bras does not a bust make. My text is very relevant to boobpedia so I'm disappointed that is deleted. The article reads like a madonna fan cut and paste-this is a site about big boobs not over hyped ones. Also anyone who would use Lynsey in the same sentence madonna does not know their boobs. madonna needs to be compared to smaller women. Just an opinion. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Why was the picture deleted? That is WHAT SHE LOOKS LIKE.
BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, it's breastking, I responded to you on the madonna page. i wrote most of Russ Meyer's wikipedia page btw. Madonna is the Anti-Super Vixen in every way shape and especially form! Best WishesBreastKing 07:20, 5 January 2009 (EST)

I responded again on the Mandonna page.Regarding my great article on Russ Meyer from wikipedia, you are extremely incorrect and lying as there are tons of notations and citations on my wikipedia article, THAT I PUT IN, that's why I was awarded my Barn Star for it as it was only two paragraphs when I got there.Perhaps you are not clear as to what my wikipedia name is? I also wrote most of the other Russ Meyer related pages correcting mistakes.
http://www.smh.com.au/ffxImage/urlpicture_id_1037490053060_2002/11/17/18ent_madonna.jpg

==Happy New Year==
Happy New Year to you too, Prophecy! I don't know if you've noticed, but we received some big news for [[Fuko]] on the new year-- She's going all-out AV. (Personally, I'd prefer just nude-posing, but I'll take AV without complaint if it comes to that ;) About other editors, yes, I see what you mean... I haven't followed what this is all about, but there was a certain editor at WP involved in the Russ Meyer page who was also changing Fuko's measurements at random, calling them "real" measurements, but based on pure guess-work... I hope this sort of bat-shittery isn't coming over here... One of WP's bad habits is carrying assumptions of good faith beyond the breaking point for disruptive users, while being unnecessarily harsh on good contributors. I trust BP's administrators will not fall into that trap though :) Looking forward to another year of good work with you. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)
:I fear it's getting even worse than pixels. You notice the stars over her nipples on the video cover, I assume? There's a new wave of censorship sweeping Japan. I hope that doesn't mean AV DVD covers are going to start looking like that! :-( [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:15, 6 January 2009 (EST)
::Hi, Prophecy-- I have a question on [http://www.boobpedia.com/butler/index.php?title=Harumi_Nemoto&diff=94725&oldid=94675 this edit] at [[Harumi Nemoto]]. Did you mean to re-locate the References section up from the bottom? If so, why? I thought we'd agreed References at bottom was to be a BP-standard. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)
::I notice you removed the Ja-wiki link in the lead with that edit also. I've been including that as a standard format in the Japanese model articles... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:51, 6 January 2009 (EST)
:::Oops. It was Apara. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 23:12, 6 January 2009 (EST)
==A weighty issue==
Hi, Prophecy. I've got an interesting problem here... I've just discovered that two of "my" models are the same person... She used the name [[Pine Miyazaki]] when she was a plump-ish big-bust model for [[Cinema Unit GAS]], then she put on some weight and became a full BBW model under the name [[Yui Kyomoto]]... So her two infoboxes are the same in many points, but very different in other points-- waist and hip measurements particularly. What to do? I'm going to go ahead and put two separate infoboxes in the merged article, but that looks clunky, and makes the "Alias" field redundant... Any better suggestions? (Incidentally, I find she made quite a few videos under a third name-- whether that involves any significant body changes, I don't know yet.) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:04, 13 January 2009 (EST)
:I've merged the two into her first stage name-- [[Momoko Okada]]-- and, again, their are significant physical differences, though she is the same model. Apparently she's been gaining weight throughout her career, beginning in 2004. The gain is reflected in the cup-size also-- from G (Japanese) to J. (And a very pretty girl, thin or fat, in my book :-) Tell me if the article can be tidied up in any way-- looks awfully cluttered to me, with three infoboxes, but I don't know how else to get around this problem. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:55, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::Hi, Prophecy... Well, I'd agree with you normally-- such as with your Lindsay example-- but in this case, the actress is almost making a different "character" for each name/weight change. The data within each name seems to be consistent, but once she has upped her weight, she changes name, character, and the info that goes with it... Yet she is still the same person, so I don't think separate articles on each one would be the answer either... How about making separate sections within the article for each "identity", with each one having its own biobox? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:40, 13 January 2009 (EST)
:::Ah... can't relocate the biobox to another section? That will be a problem... I haven't dug into this case enough to be 100% sure, but I suspect I will find that other data does change also... height might stay the same, but birthplace may change, as, obviously, the name does... I'll make this article a research project-- this model has caught my eye in the past, in all three of her incarnations as a pleasing subject for further research :-) -- and I will fill you in on the details once I have found the information... Maybe three separate, inter-linked articles will be the best way to go? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:48, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::::I agree, it would be best to be in one article. But it's true, this is an unusual case. She's obviously the same person, but she's creating a different persona for each physical change... Like I say, I'll research her, and think more about it. Once I get more info on the subject I'll ask you, and maybe get the Admins involved too. Got to go now-- cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:54, 13 January 2009 (EST)
==Comparison==
Hi Prophecy-- I'm currently editing where I don't have the leisure of doing any image-viewing... Hence, the harmless category-adding and linking edits. I'll check tonight (my night-- morning, or whatever for you-- about six-seven hours from now). [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:31, 15 January 2009 (EST)
:I had a look for myself. They seem to have the same eyebrows (which isn't much). But I can't really see any similarities at all. I tried looking for birth marks/moles, but couldn't find any. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)

== Spam blacklist ==

I've taken it off the list. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 18:53, 27 January 2009 (EST)

==Bad news==
Hi, Prophecy. I see you've been busy at work here. I've been trying to keep up with the Japanese series too-- lots of great stuff going on over there these days :) Horrible news though: My home computer became basically useless last night. The system's all screwed up-- way out of date anyway... I now have no Internet, to say the least. No image capabilities, and probably not even able to do text editing... Also I see they've now disabled image downloading at the public computers I use too... So, I'm going to be, basically, unable to contribute here except for text, and that only very rarely... I'll do what I can to keep up with things until I can get the home computer situation fixed! I'll try to check in as often I can, and keep a record of what's going on with the Japanese videos/actresses. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:42, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
:Jeez, I didn't know you'd take the news so hard! I think I've got the problem fixed now, so work on the Japanese boob community should re-commence tonight or tomorrow. Glad to be back! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:06, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
::No problem-- just kidding above :) The magnificent [[Mitsumi Nanao]] caused the trouble-- I was trying to view a video of hers, and downloaded software that screwed up some of my system files. Anyway, now that I've got Internet again, I'll dig back in on Mitsumi! Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:11, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
==Video Company/Studio/Label template?==
Hi Prophecy. I noticed your nice manufacturer templates, but couldn't find a similar one for video (or film) studios & labels. I'd like to put a template, or at least the company logo on appropriate pages-- I've started quite a few on Japanese studios & labels. Should I just use the manufacturer template? Or would it be worthwhile to create a new film or video studio template? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:14, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
:OK-- I'll just do the logos for now, but more specific templates are something to think about for future projects. Although I suspect a lot of the general studio information is going to be difficult to find on Japanese subjects. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:57, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
==The template problem==
Hi Prophecy. About the filmography template problem: More and more actress pages load sooo slowly due to the templated filmographies. At [[Mitsumi Nanao]], I'm experimenting with a new format. Just a text filmography in the actress' article, and a link to the "Main filmography" article at the top. Do you think that works? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:30, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
:Good-- I guess I'll start doing that as a standard for filmographies over, maybe ten entries? And the template entries on the actress' main page will be just those in which she is the star. I don't want to get back to putting in those cumbersome tables again, so just a text entry with a link to a full, templated filmography should work. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 10:51, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

== removed photos ==

hi prophecy, the removals were requested by a copyright agent working on behalf of one or more of the photographers. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:14, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
:that agent referred to her by one of her stage names. i assume he searches the internet for all images of her using that stage name. since i have no idea which photographers the agent represents, i don't know whether a photo from a different photographer would trigger another email. it's best to leave that page alone for now. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:38, 30 April 2009 (EDT)

== Template Lists ==

Do you know how to make template list, like the [[DanniGirls]] one? [[User:Cost|Cost]] 10:25, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Biobox new
:Hi, Prophecy. Cost pointed me to these list templates, which I haven't used yet. I couldn't think of an immediate use for them for my own work, but I have found a site which lists sales rankings (popularity) of busty/BBW models. Maybe this template would work for creating a list/template of their #1 model for each month... One thing though-- the list template itself doesn't seem to have much advantage over just listing the models manually. (Obviously, the template that goes on the model pages does offer an advantage.) But if there would be a way to add a thumbnail photo of the model in the straight lists, as at [[DanniGirls]], I think that would be a significant advantage. Is it possible? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
::Right now, the [[DanniGirl]] templates only go from 2006-2008. I was planning on adding the 2009 models to it. Other list templates, like the playboy and penthouse one can also be updated. [[User:Cost|Cost]] 17:12, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
:::That worked. I'll do some of the other lists as well. I just saw the real penthouse list and it goes up to 1969... I have my work cut out for me. Anyways, by posting on the suggestions page, I'm hoping other volunteers and lurkers will get encouraged to take the initiative to contribute. Hopefully it works.... [[User:Cost|Cost]] 17:24, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
::Hi again, Prophecy. Thanks for the explanation... I'm not sure I follow though. I don't think it was the images that caused the template/server problem. Remember our Uschi filmography test? That one had no images at all-- or maybe just one or two. I don't think it would be necessary at all to make sure that the biobox and the template photos are the same, so there's no need-- at least in my mind-- to make the biobox an all-purpose template. I would think just keeping the list template and adding a photo parameter would do... and wouldn't add much more stress to the server than the list template already has. Or am I not following? Anyway, I'll keep this in mind to try out for that "Top model of the month" list later on. Oh-- and Cost-- Sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you were asking if I knew how to do the template, meaning that I should give it a try-- I didn't realize you were asking for advice. But I've never used it anyway, so Prophecy is the right guy to ask :-) Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 03:28, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

== Biobox new ==
Hi Prophecy,
I am trying to use the Biobox new template in another wiki. I am using all the related templates as well as the monobook and common.css configuration. But I'm facing a problem. In the performances section even if i leave these fields empty the keywords continue appearing (Topless, Bush, Full frontal, Pink, Masturbation, Dildo, Fisting, etc.) and the categories are also being added at the bottom.
It's a brilliant template. I want to use it and properly attribute it to Boobpedia.
Do you have any idea why is this happening?
Thank you in advance--[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 11:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT) 
Hi Prophecy, thank you for your kindness and your offer to help me. What I've seen (after testing) is that the template is working fine in MediaWiki 1.13.3 (or earlier) but it won't work in 1.14. Can you think of a quick fix for that or maybe guide me towards a solution? Thank you again. Have a nice day! --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 03:37, 12 May 2009 (EDT) 
I have further problems of compatibility between the template and Mediawiki's version :( 
Look [http://morfogenesis.com/index.php?title=Template:Biobox_new this], for example 
Let me check the issue and I'll call you back. Many thanks! --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 06:30, 13 May 2009 (EDT) 
Hi Prophecy, any news about the issue on Biobox new? Thanx. --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 04:57, 25 May 2009 (EDT)

== Tattoo category? ==
Hey Prophecy, long time, no talk.

I wanted to ask your opinnion on a category of women here on Boobpedia with tattoos. You think this would be relevant or a waste of server space? [[User:Apara|Apara]] 02:58, 13 May 2009 (EDT)
:Thanks for the feedback, I was thinking the same as you were. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 01:47, 15 May 2009 (EDT)

User talk:Prophecy

2009-05-13T10:30:29Z

Yorgos: /* Biobox new */

* [[User talk:Prophecy|Main talk page]]
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 1|Archive 1]] from 2008-04-12 to 2008-08-05
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 2|Archive 2]] from 2008-08-05 to 2008-12-07

== Fishnets ==
I've been noticing the uploading of fishnet clothing pictures. Some pin up article have pictures of them in fishnets. [[Lorraine Burnett]] and [[Marge Mellor]], come to mind.[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:10, 9 December 2008 (EST)
:Oh ok, well if you needed more, then you know where to look....[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:27, 9 December 2008 (EST)

== Movie Pages ==

For a few of the articles, I want to mention that the performer performed in the infamous pardory ''Who's Naylin' Paylin?.'' How do you make those pages? [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:37, 10 December 2008 (EST)
:Yes. I forgot to add that... [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:42, 10 December 2008 (EST)

== Booble Girls ==

A [[Boobpedia:Suggestions|request]] has been made for a [[:Template:DanniGirls|DanniGirls]]-type template for [[:Category:Booble Cover Girls|:Category:Booble Cover Girls]], if you're interested (and don't have any other projects you're working on :) ) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 22:09, 15 December 2008 (EST)

== Supporting Actresses and Sequels ==

What do we do with supporting actresses? Should we include them in the template or just the article? The two films that have this are ''[[Pirates]]'' and ''[[Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge]]''.

The latter is also the sequel to the former. Should I put it type=episode in the template for them?

[[User:Cost|Cost]] 13:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)
:Yeah, that's what I was planning on doing too. [[User:Cost|Cost]] 02:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)

== Since you started the article ==
You probably have something to say, [[Talk:Madonna]]. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 03:07, 4 January 2009 (EST)

==Micro Tits Ciccone==
Sure, but she has not looked like the black and white photo for almost 25 years, the new photo is what she looks like. Madonna is NOT a C and barely ever was, in her early days she was virtually flat chested. I have sent pics to an editor to show you what I mean. Cone bras does not a bust make. My text is very relevant to boobpedia so I'm disappointed that is deleted. The article reads like a madonna fan cut and paste-this is a site about big boobs not over hyped ones. Also anyone who would use Lynsey in the same sentence madonna does not know their boobs. madonna needs to be compared to smaller women. Just an opinion. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Why was the picture deleted? That is WHAT SHE LOOKS LIKE.
BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, it's breastking, I responded to you on the madonna page. i wrote most of Russ Meyer's wikipedia page btw. Madonna is the Anti-Super Vixen in every way shape and especially form! Best WishesBreastKing 07:20, 5 January 2009 (EST)

I responded again on the Mandonna page.Regarding my great article on Russ Meyer from wikipedia, you are extremely incorrect and lying as there are tons of notations and citations on my wikipedia article, THAT I PUT IN, that's why I was awarded my Barn Star for it as it was only two paragraphs when I got there.Perhaps you are not clear as to what my wikipedia name is? I also wrote most of the other Russ Meyer related pages correcting mistakes.
http://www.smh.com.au/ffxImage/urlpicture_id_1037490053060_2002/11/17/18ent_madonna.jpg

==Happy New Year==
Happy New Year to you too, Prophecy! I don't know if you've noticed, but we received some big news for [[Fuko]] on the new year-- She's going all-out AV. (Personally, I'd prefer just nude-posing, but I'll take AV without complaint if it comes to that ;) About other editors, yes, I see what you mean... I haven't followed what this is all about, but there was a certain editor at WP involved in the Russ Meyer page who was also changing Fuko's measurements at random, calling them "real" measurements, but based on pure guess-work... I hope this sort of bat-shittery isn't coming over here... One of WP's bad habits is carrying assumptions of good faith beyond the breaking point for disruptive users, while being unnecessarily harsh on good contributors. I trust BP's administrators will not fall into that trap though :) Looking forward to another year of good work with you. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)
:I fear it's getting even worse than pixels. You notice the stars over her nipples on the video cover, I assume? There's a new wave of censorship sweeping Japan. I hope that doesn't mean AV DVD covers are going to start looking like that! :-( [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:15, 6 January 2009 (EST)
::Hi, Prophecy-- I have a question on [http://www.boobpedia.com/butler/index.php?title=Harumi_Nemoto&diff=94725&oldid=94675 this edit] at [[Harumi Nemoto]]. Did you mean to re-locate the References section up from the bottom? If so, why? I thought we'd agreed References at bottom was to be a BP-standard. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)
::I notice you removed the Ja-wiki link in the lead with that edit also. I've been including that as a standard format in the Japanese model articles... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:51, 6 January 2009 (EST)
:::Oops. It was Apara. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 23:12, 6 January 2009 (EST)
==A weighty issue==
Hi, Prophecy. I've got an interesting problem here... I've just discovered that two of "my" models are the same person... She used the name [[Pine Miyazaki]] when she was a plump-ish big-bust model for [[Cinema Unit GAS]], then she put on some weight and became a full BBW model under the name [[Yui Kyomoto]]... So her two infoboxes are the same in many points, but very different in other points-- waist and hip measurements particularly. What to do? I'm going to go ahead and put two separate infoboxes in the merged article, but that looks clunky, and makes the "Alias" field redundant... Any better suggestions? (Incidentally, I find she made quite a few videos under a third name-- whether that involves any significant body changes, I don't know yet.) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:04, 13 January 2009 (EST)
:I've merged the two into her first stage name-- [[Momoko Okada]]-- and, again, their are significant physical differences, though she is the same model. Apparently she's been gaining weight throughout her career, beginning in 2004. The gain is reflected in the cup-size also-- from G (Japanese) to J. (And a very pretty girl, thin or fat, in my book :-) Tell me if the article can be tidied up in any way-- looks awfully cluttered to me, with three infoboxes, but I don't know how else to get around this problem. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:55, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::Hi, Prophecy... Well, I'd agree with you normally-- such as with your Lindsay example-- but in this case, the actress is almost making a different "character" for each name/weight change. The data within each name seems to be consistent, but once she has upped her weight, she changes name, character, and the info that goes with it... Yet she is still the same person, so I don't think separate articles on each one would be the answer either... How about making separate sections within the article for each "identity", with each one having its own biobox? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:40, 13 January 2009 (EST)
:::Ah... can't relocate the biobox to another section? That will be a problem... I haven't dug into this case enough to be 100% sure, but I suspect I will find that other data does change also... height might stay the same, but birthplace may change, as, obviously, the name does... I'll make this article a research project-- this model has caught my eye in the past, in all three of her incarnations as a pleasing subject for further research :-) -- and I will fill you in on the details once I have found the information... Maybe three separate, inter-linked articles will be the best way to go? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:48, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::::I agree, it would be best to be in one article. But it's true, this is an unusual case. She's obviously the same person, but she's creating a different persona for each physical change... Like I say, I'll research her, and think more about it. Once I get more info on the subject I'll ask you, and maybe get the Admins involved too. Got to go now-- cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:54, 13 January 2009 (EST)
==Comparison==
Hi Prophecy-- I'm currently editing where I don't have the leisure of doing any image-viewing... Hence, the harmless category-adding and linking edits. I'll check tonight (my night-- morning, or whatever for you-- about six-seven hours from now). [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:31, 15 January 2009 (EST)
:I had a look for myself. They seem to have the same eyebrows (which isn't much). But I can't really see any similarities at all. I tried looking for birth marks/moles, but couldn't find any. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)

== Spam blacklist ==

I've taken it off the list. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 18:53, 27 January 2009 (EST)

==Bad news==
Hi, Prophecy. I see you've been busy at work here. I've been trying to keep up with the Japanese series too-- lots of great stuff going on over there these days :) Horrible news though: My home computer became basically useless last night. The system's all screwed up-- way out of date anyway... I now have no Internet, to say the least. No image capabilities, and probably not even able to do text editing... Also I see they've now disabled image downloading at the public computers I use too... So, I'm going to be, basically, unable to contribute here except for text, and that only very rarely... I'll do what I can to keep up with things until I can get the home computer situation fixed! I'll try to check in as often I can, and keep a record of what's going on with the Japanese videos/actresses. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:42, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
:Jeez, I didn't know you'd take the news so hard! I think I've got the problem fixed now, so work on the Japanese boob community should re-commence tonight or tomorrow. Glad to be back! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:06, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
::No problem-- just kidding above :) The magnificent [[Mitsumi Nanao]] caused the trouble-- I was trying to view a video of hers, and downloaded software that screwed up some of my system files. Anyway, now that I've got Internet again, I'll dig back in on Mitsumi! Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:11, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
==Video Company/Studio/Label template?==
Hi Prophecy. I noticed your nice manufacturer templates, but couldn't find a similar one for video (or film) studios & labels. I'd like to put a template, or at least the company logo on appropriate pages-- I've started quite a few on Japanese studios & labels. Should I just use the manufacturer template? Or would it be worthwhile to create a new film or video studio template? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:14, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
:OK-- I'll just do the logos for now, but more specific templates are something to think about for future projects. Although I suspect a lot of the general studio information is going to be difficult to find on Japanese subjects. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:57, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
==The template problem==
Hi Prophecy. About the filmography template problem: More and more actress pages load sooo slowly due to the templated filmographies. At [[Mitsumi Nanao]], I'm experimenting with a new format. Just a text filmography in the actress' article, and a link to the "Main filmography" article at the top. Do you think that works? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:30, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
:Good-- I guess I'll start doing that as a standard for filmographies over, maybe ten entries? And the template entries on the actress' main page will be just those in which she is the star. I don't want to get back to putting in those cumbersome tables again, so just a text entry with a link to a full, templated filmography should work. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 10:51, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

== removed photos ==

hi prophecy, the removals were requested by a copyright agent working on behalf of one or more of the photographers. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:14, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
:that agent referred to her by one of her stage names. i assume he searches the internet for all images of her using that stage name. since i have no idea which photographers the agent represents, i don't know whether a photo from a different photographer would trigger another email. it's best to leave that page alone for now. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:38, 30 April 2009 (EDT)

== Template Lists ==

Do you know how to make template list, like the [[DanniGirls]] one? [[User:Cost|Cost]] 10:25, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Biobox new
:Hi, Prophecy. Cost pointed me to these list templates, which I haven't used yet. I couldn't think of an immediate use for them for my own work, but I have found a site which lists sales rankings (popularity) of busty/BBW models. Maybe this template would work for creating a list/template of their #1 model for each month... One thing though-- the list template itself doesn't seem to have much advantage over just listing the models manually. (Obviously, the template that goes on the model pages does offer an advantage.) But if there would be a way to add a thumbnail photo of the model in the straight lists, as at [[DanniGirls]], I think that would be a significant advantage. Is it possible? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
::Right now, the [[DanniGirl]] templates only go from 2006-2008. I was planning on adding the 2009 models to it. Other list templates, like the playboy and penthouse one can also be updated. [[User:Cost|Cost]] 17:12, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
:::That worked. I'll do some of the other lists as well. I just saw the real penthouse list and it goes up to 1969... I have my work cut out for me. Anyways, by posting on the suggestions page, I'm hoping other volunteers and lurkers will get encouraged to take the initiative to contribute. Hopefully it works.... [[User:Cost|Cost]] 17:24, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
::Hi again, Prophecy. Thanks for the explanation... I'm not sure I follow though. I don't think it was the images that caused the template/server problem. Remember our Uschi filmography test? That one had no images at all-- or maybe just one or two. I don't think it would be necessary at all to make sure that the biobox and the template photos are the same, so there's no need-- at least in my mind-- to make the biobox an all-purpose template. I would think just keeping the list template and adding a photo parameter would do... and wouldn't add much more stress to the server than the list template already has. Or am I not following? Anyway, I'll keep this in mind to try out for that "Top model of the month" list later on. Oh-- and Cost-- Sorry I misunderstood you. I thought you were asking if I knew how to do the template, meaning that I should give it a try-- I didn't realize you were asking for advice. But I've never used it anyway, so Prophecy is the right guy to ask :-) Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 03:28, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

== Biobox new ==
Hi Prophecy,
I am trying to use the Biobox new template in another wiki. I am using all the related templates as well as the monobook and common.css configuration. But I'm facing a problem. In the performances section even if i leave these fields empty the keywords continue appearing (Topless, Bush, Full frontal, Pink, Masturbation, Dildo, Fisting, etc.) and the categories are also being added at the bottom.
It's a brilliant template. I want to use it and properly attribute it to Boobpedia.
Do you have any idea why is this happening?
Thank you in advance--[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 11:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT) 
Hi Prophecy, thank you for your kindness and your offer to help me. What I've seen (after testing) is that the template is working fine in MediaWiki 1.13.3 (or earlier) but it won't work in 1.14. Can you think of a quick fix for that or maybe guide me towards a solution? Thank you again. Have a nice day! --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 03:37, 12 May 2009 (EDT) 
I have further problems of compatibility between the template and Mediawiki's version :( 
Look [http://morfogenesis.com/index.php?title=Template:Biobox_new this], for example 
Let me check the issue and I'll call you back. Many thanks! --[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 06:30, 13 May 2009 (EDT)

== Tattoo category? ==
Hey Prophecy, long time, no talk.

I wanted to ask your opinnion on a category of women here on Boobpedia with tattoos. You think this would be relevant or a waste of server space? [[User:Apara|Apara]] 02:58, 13 May 2009 (EDT)

User talk:Prophecy

2009-05-12T07:37:13Z

Yorgos: /* Biobox new */

User talk:Prophecy

2009-05-08T15:10:16Z

Yorgos:

* [[User talk:Prophecy|Main talk page]]
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 1|Archive 1]] from 2008-04-12 to 2008-08-05
* [[User talk:Prophecy/Archive 2|Archive 2]] from 2008-08-05 to 2008-12-07

== Fishnets ==
I've been noticing the uploading of fishnet clothing pictures. Some pin up article have pictures of them in fishnets. [[Lorraine Burnett]] and [[Marge Mellor]], come to mind.[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:10, 9 December 2008 (EST)
:Oh ok, well if you needed more, then you know where to look....[[User:Apara|Apara]] 23:27, 9 December 2008 (EST)

== Movie Pages ==

For a few of the articles, I want to mention that the performer performed in the infamous pardory ''Who's Naylin' Paylin?.'' How do you make those pages? [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:37, 10 December 2008 (EST)
:Yes. I forgot to add that... [[User:Cost|Cost]] 18:42, 10 December 2008 (EST)

== Booble Girls ==

A [[Boobpedia:Suggestions|request]] has been made for a [[:Template:DanniGirls|DanniGirls]]-type template for [[:Category:Booble Cover Girls|:Category:Booble Cover Girls]], if you're interested (and don't have any other projects you're working on :) ) [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 22:09, 15 December 2008 (EST)

== Supporting Actresses and Sequels ==

What do we do with supporting actresses? Should we include them in the template or just the article? The two films that have this are ''[[Pirates]]'' and ''[[Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge]]''.

The latter is also the sequel to the former. Should I put it type=episode in the template for them?

[[User:Cost|Cost]] 13:11, 25 December 2008 (EST)
:Yeah, that's what I was planning on doing too. [[User:Cost|Cost]] 02:04, 29 December 2008 (EST)

== Since you started the article ==
You probably have something to say, [[Talk:Madonna]]. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 03:07, 4 January 2009 (EST)

==Micro Tits Ciccone==
Sure, but she has not looked like the black and white photo for almost 25 years, the new photo is what she looks like. Madonna is NOT a C and barely ever was, in her early days she was virtually flat chested. I have sent pics to an editor to show you what I mean. Cone bras does not a bust make. My text is very relevant to boobpedia so I'm disappointed that is deleted. The article reads like a madonna fan cut and paste-this is a site about big boobs not over hyped ones. Also anyone who would use Lynsey in the same sentence madonna does not know their boobs. madonna needs to be compared to smaller women. Just an opinion. BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Why was the picture deleted? That is WHAT SHE LOOKS LIKE.
BreastKing 04:03, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Hi, it's breastking, I responded to you on the madonna page. i wrote most of Russ Meyer's wikipedia page btw. Madonna is the Anti-Super Vixen in every way shape and especially form! Best WishesBreastKing 07:20, 5 January 2009 (EST)

I responded again on the Mandonna page.Regarding my great article on Russ Meyer from wikipedia, you are extremely incorrect and lying as there are tons of notations and citations on my wikipedia article, THAT I PUT IN, that's why I was awarded my Barn Star for it as it was only two paragraphs when I got there.Perhaps you are not clear as to what my wikipedia name is? I also wrote most of the other Russ Meyer related pages correcting mistakes.
http://www.smh.com.au/ffxImage/urlpicture_id_1037490053060_2002/11/17/18ent_madonna.jpg

==Happy New Year==
Happy New Year to you too, Prophecy! I don't know if you've noticed, but we received some big news for [[Fuko]] on the new year-- She's going all-out AV. (Personally, I'd prefer just nude-posing, but I'll take AV without complaint if it comes to that ;) About other editors, yes, I see what you mean... I haven't followed what this is all about, but there was a certain editor at WP involved in the Russ Meyer page who was also changing Fuko's measurements at random, calling them "real" measurements, but based on pure guess-work... I hope this sort of bat-shittery isn't coming over here... One of WP's bad habits is carrying assumptions of good faith beyond the breaking point for disruptive users, while being unnecessarily harsh on good contributors. I trust BP's administrators will not fall into that trap though :) Looking forward to another year of good work with you. Cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 09:40, 6 January 2009 (EST)
:I fear it's getting even worse than pixels. You notice the stars over her nipples on the video cover, I assume? There's a new wave of censorship sweeping Japan. I hope that doesn't mean AV DVD covers are going to start looking like that! :-( [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:15, 6 January 2009 (EST)
::Hi, Prophecy-- I have a question on [http://www.boobpedia.com/butler/index.php?title=Harumi_Nemoto&diff=94725&oldid=94675 this edit] at [[Harumi Nemoto]]. Did you mean to re-locate the References section up from the bottom? If so, why? I thought we'd agreed References at bottom was to be a BP-standard. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:49, 6 January 2009 (EST)
::I notice you removed the Ja-wiki link in the lead with that edit also. I've been including that as a standard format in the Japanese model articles... [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:51, 6 January 2009 (EST)
:::Oops. It was Apara. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 23:12, 6 January 2009 (EST)
==A weighty issue==
Hi, Prophecy. I've got an interesting problem here... I've just discovered that two of "my" models are the same person... She used the name [[Pine Miyazaki]] when she was a plump-ish big-bust model for [[Cinema Unit GAS]], then she put on some weight and became a full BBW model under the name [[Yui Kyomoto]]... So her two infoboxes are the same in many points, but very different in other points-- waist and hip measurements particularly. What to do? I'm going to go ahead and put two separate infoboxes in the merged article, but that looks clunky, and makes the "Alias" field redundant... Any better suggestions? (Incidentally, I find she made quite a few videos under a third name-- whether that involves any significant body changes, I don't know yet.) [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:04, 13 January 2009 (EST)
:I've merged the two into her first stage name-- [[Momoko Okada]]-- and, again, their are significant physical differences, though she is the same model. Apparently she's been gaining weight throughout her career, beginning in 2004. The gain is reflected in the cup-size also-- from G (Japanese) to J. (And a very pretty girl, thin or fat, in my book :-) Tell me if the article can be tidied up in any way-- looks awfully cluttered to me, with three infoboxes, but I don't know how else to get around this problem. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:55, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::Hi, Prophecy... Well, I'd agree with you normally-- such as with your Lindsay example-- but in this case, the actress is almost making a different "character" for each name/weight change. The data within each name seems to be consistent, but once she has upped her weight, she changes name, character, and the info that goes with it... Yet she is still the same person, so I don't think separate articles on each one would be the answer either... How about making separate sections within the article for each "identity", with each one having its own biobox? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:40, 13 January 2009 (EST)
:::Ah... can't relocate the biobox to another section? That will be a problem... I haven't dug into this case enough to be 100% sure, but I suspect I will find that other data does change also... height might stay the same, but birthplace may change, as, obviously, the name does... I'll make this article a research project-- this model has caught my eye in the past, in all three of her incarnations as a pleasing subject for further research :-) -- and I will fill you in on the details once I have found the information... Maybe three separate, inter-linked articles will be the best way to go? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:48, 13 January 2009 (EST)
::::I agree, it would be best to be in one article. But it's true, this is an unusual case. She's obviously the same person, but she's creating a different persona for each physical change... Like I say, I'll research her, and think more about it. Once I get more info on the subject I'll ask you, and maybe get the Admins involved too. Got to go now-- cheers! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:54, 13 January 2009 (EST)
==Comparison==
Hi Prophecy-- I'm currently editing where I don't have the leisure of doing any image-viewing... Hence, the harmless category-adding and linking edits. I'll check tonight (my night-- morning, or whatever for you-- about six-seven hours from now). [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:31, 15 January 2009 (EST)
:I had a look for myself. They seem to have the same eyebrows (which isn't much). But I can't really see any similarities at all. I tried looking for birth marks/moles, but couldn't find any. [[User:Apara|Apara]] 19:25, 15 January 2009 (EST)

== Spam blacklist ==

I've taken it off the list. [[User:The Honorable|The Honorable]] 18:53, 27 January 2009 (EST)

==Bad news==
Hi, Prophecy. I see you've been busy at work here. I've been trying to keep up with the Japanese series too-- lots of great stuff going on over there these days :) Horrible news though: My home computer became basically useless last night. The system's all screwed up-- way out of date anyway... I now have no Internet, to say the least. No image capabilities, and probably not even able to do text editing... Also I see they've now disabled image downloading at the public computers I use too... So, I'm going to be, basically, unable to contribute here except for text, and that only very rarely... I'll do what I can to keep up with things until I can get the home computer situation fixed! I'll try to check in as often I can, and keep a record of what's going on with the Japanese videos/actresses. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 15:42, 23 March 2009 (EDT)
:Jeez, I didn't know you'd take the news so hard! I think I've got the problem fixed now, so work on the Japanese boob community should re-commence tonight or tomorrow. Glad to be back! [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 16:06, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
::No problem-- just kidding above :) The magnificent [[Mitsumi Nanao]] caused the trouble-- I was trying to view a video of hers, and downloaded software that screwed up some of my system files. Anyway, now that I've got Internet again, I'll dig back in on Mitsumi! Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 22:11, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
==Video Company/Studio/Label template?==
Hi Prophecy. I noticed your nice manufacturer templates, but couldn't find a similar one for video (or film) studios & labels. I'd like to put a template, or at least the company logo on appropriate pages-- I've started quite a few on Japanese studios & labels. Should I just use the manufacturer template? Or would it be worthwhile to create a new film or video studio template? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:14, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
:OK-- I'll just do the logos for now, but more specific templates are something to think about for future projects. Although I suspect a lot of the general studio information is going to be difficult to find on Japanese subjects. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 18:57, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
==The template problem==
Hi Prophecy. About the filmography template problem: More and more actress pages load sooo slowly due to the templated filmographies. At [[Mitsumi Nanao]], I'm experimenting with a new format. Just a text filmography in the actress' article, and a link to the "Main filmography" article at the top. Do you think that works? [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 00:30, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
:Good-- I guess I'll start doing that as a standard for filmographies over, maybe ten entries? And the template entries on the actress' main page will be just those in which she is the star. I don't want to get back to putting in those cumbersome tables again, so just a text entry with a link to a full, templated filmography should work. Regards. [[User:Dekkappai|Dekkappai]] 10:51, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

== removed photos ==

hi prophecy, the removals were requested by a copyright agent working on behalf of one or more of the photographers. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:14, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
:that agent referred to her by one of her stage names. i assume he searches the internet for all images of her using that stage name. since i have no idea which photographers the agent represents, i don't know whether a photo from a different photographer would trigger another email. it's best to leave that page alone for now. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 13:38, 30 April 2009 (EDT)

== Template Lists ==

Do you know how to make template list, like the [[DanniGirls]] one? [[User:Cost|Cost]] 10:25, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Biobox new

== Biobox new ==
Hi Honorable,
I am trying to use the Biobox new template in another wiki. I am using all the related templates as well as the monobook and common.css configuration. But I'm facing a problem. In the performances section even if i leave these fields empty the keywords continue appearing (Topless, Bush, Full frontal, Pink, Masturbation, Dildo, Fisting, etc.) and the categories are also being added at the bottom.
It's a brilliant template. I want to use it and properly attribute it to Boobpedia.
Do you have any idea why is this happening?
Thank you in advance--[[User:Yorgos|Yorgos]] 11:10, 8 May 2009 (EDT)

User:Yorgos

2009-04-09T11:06:14Z

Yorgos: New page: European boob enthousiast!

European boob enthousiast!