Category talk:Categories

2014-01-14T02:25:22Z

Treecko: /* Saggy breasts */

== Ideas ==

- Categories for Reality Kings and MILFNextdoor? Brianna Ray and the MILFHunter models frequent these two sites.

- would be really cool if:

- we had a catorgory for height,

- or a country of origin, (polish girls are the nicest) -The preceding '''unsigned''' comment was added by [[User:Jillisawhore|Jillisawhore]] ([[User talk:Jillisawhore|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jillisawhore|contribs]]) 19:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC).

:i have thought about categorizing height. if we sort them too finely, there would be a lot of categories - not just in inches but in centimeters as well. perhaps two categories, tall and short? the rest would be average height and don't need to be categorized. we still need to decide what is tall and what is short though

:there is the current nationality category that is fairly helpful in indicating country of origin. nationality is the current citizenship of the model, and can indicate where she's done the most work. if you check the nationality -> polish category, you'll find a pretty accurate selection of polish models. hopefully that's what you are looking for --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 12:45, 13 November 2006 (PST)

How about a few categories, not just two for height? Under 5'2, 5'2-6, 5'7-10, over 5'10 for example?

How about an alphbetical index for browsing? -The preceding '''unsigned''' comment was added by [[User:66.41.31.101|66.41.31.101]] ([[User talk:66.41.31.101|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/66.41.31.101|contribs]]) 05:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC).

:that can be done, but it's a lot of work. personally, i think having a short and a tall (amazon) category is enough, with the rest being of average height. if you want to undertake this task of dividing them further, you are free to try :) anyone can edit boobpedia.

:there is an [[Special:Allpages]] option, linked from the [[Main Page]]. just ignore the ones in italics, as they are redirects. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 18:23, 12 March 2007 (PDT)

How about we at least sort out the cup sizes into a category? [[User:Disavian|Disavian]] 19:27, 12 March 2007 (PDT)

:do you mean putting all the cup sizes into a single cup size category? my take is that the cup size categories are the most important categories, and so should be left at the top level. there may be a lot of cup sizes, but people who come here really care about the "bigness" :) --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 00:06, 13 March 2007 (PDT)

I can see that there's some confusion in the hair/ethnicity categories, as someone with black hair, and someone that is actually black, both end up in [[:Category:Black]]. Perhaps it should add to [[:Category:Black hair]] which is a subcategory of [[:Category:Hair color]], etc [[User:Disavian|Disavian]] 09:48, 14 March 2007 (PDT)
:My bad, you're supposed to write "Black hair" in there with hair color... makes sense. *goes to fix [[Sierra]]* [[User:Disavian|Disavian]] 09:49, 14 March 2007 (PDT)

How about one for "Cup size missing" or "unknown cup size" that the template transcludes if you don't provide a cup size? [[User:Disavian|Disavian]] 14:49, 19 March 2007 (PDT)
:please check with [[user:The Honorable|The Honorable]]. he's the creator of the biobox template --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 14:13, 21 April 2007 (PDT)

Support category intersection (Mediawiki has extensions for that)! That way we could search for a certain cup size + natural breasts, etc. -The preceding '''unsigned''' comment was added by [[User:88.153.71.110|88.153.71.110]] ([[User talk:88.153.71.110|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/88.153.71.110|contribs]]) 01:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC).
:sounds interesting. do you have a link to the extension page? --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 14:13, 21 April 2007 (PDT)
::[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category#Category_intersection.2C_union.2C_etc. Check it out here.] Please consider adding these extensions. Category intersection would be great. [[User:Fattydaddy|daddy]] 01:07, 17 February 2009 (EST)

== Cup sizes ==

Any effort to classify models by cup sizes is bound to lead to frustration, and can only be estimates at best. Anyone who has known a woman with breasts larger than a US E cup knows that they can vary one, two, or even three cup sizes depending on the weather or the time of the month. -The preceding '''unsigned''' comment was added by [[User:Pedonbio|Pedonbio]] ([[User talk:Pedonbio|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pedonbio|contribs]]) 00:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC).

: Maybe so, but you're posting in the wrong site. I'm sure if they catch people guessing, they'd delete their guesses. Every bust size you see here is eventually taken from other sites (usually IMDb and sometimes playboy.com actually provides them for playmates), so it's those other sites you need to convince. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 16:03, 17 October 2007 (PDT)

== Category:By... ==

i reverted the changes you made to the hair color and body type categories. the reason is that creating another category to encompass top level categories is unnecessary. also there are a lot of important categories on the top level, so it's not a good idea to force certain ones to the front while leaving the others in the back. the default alphabetic sorting makes things pretty easy to find anyway. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 15:37, 17 October 2007 (PDT)
:Then how come there's a category for cup sizes?

:Not to mention that they don't have to ''remain'' on the top level after there's a genral top category for them to be under. Imagine how much more convenient it would be. Besides, the top level gets more and more crowded and you'd probably add more categories down the line, so think long term. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 15:40, 17 October 2007 (PDT)

::there's a "by cup size" category because i'm too lazy to go and revert the changes. i'd have to go to each cup size category and delete the tags. there's been a couple of attempts to reduce the number of top level categories. i understand the intention, but i resisted putting the important categories into subcategories. my rationale is that physical description categories should be left at the top level (for example: cup size, natural or fake, ethnicity, hair color, body type, height), and that's why i tolerate the huge number of cup size categories at the top. i do try to move the less important stuff into subcategories. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 18:15, 17 October 2007 (PDT)

::: Then maybe you should put a disclaimer at the top saying something like "please don't add any parent categories". Also, if you announce at the disclaimer what's less important, you may get help with such sub-categories. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 07:14, 19 October 2007 (PDT)

::::i'll put something into the help page, which new editors are supposed to read. a disclaimer such as "please don't put this at the top level" would have to be put into every category page, so i'd rather add to the help page. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 15:18, 19 October 2007 (PDT)

== Chubby vs. BBW ==

As they share no parent category (see other discussion), I guess I'll ask here - what's the difference? Thanks. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 15:48, 17 October 2007 (PDT)

:it's a rough division. an example would be ''voluptuous'' versus ''xl girls''. chubby would be in ''voluptuous'', while bbw would be in ''xl girls''. also if a model specifically markets herself as bbw, we'll put her in bbw. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 18:15, 17 October 2007 (PDT)

:: So BBW (unless just self proclaimed for marketing) is one step after Chubby? -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 07:14, 19 October 2007 (PDT)

:::yes exactly --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 15:18, 19 October 2007 (PDT)

:::: Without self marketing, how do you decide if someone large is chubby or BBW? BBW sounds more like a brand name than a body type, so perhaps it is reserved as such? -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 18:54, 22 October 2007 (PDT)

::::: chubby is someone who's a bit plump, BBW is more than just plump. to get a feel for what qualifies as BBW, take a look at the models in ''xl girls'' who are definitely BBW, versus those in ''voluptuous'' who would be chubby. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 23:36, 22 October 2007 (PDT)

== Unique nipple shapes ==
Maybe Inverted Nipples should be added to the categories. -The preceding '''unsigned''' comment was added by [[User:68.195.108.162|68.195.108.162]] ([[User talk:68.195.108.162|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/68.195.108.162|contribs]]) 16:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC).

: Is this common enough for a whole category? Anyway, there's already Large areolas so I was thinking about Large nipples (a-la [[Chiharu Mizushima]]). -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 17:47, 28 October 2007 (PDT)
:: Maybe "long" is a better descriptive word. I've created such a category. Please share your input. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 07:47, 20 January 2008 (EST)

== Saggy breasts ==
Someone has just added the category [[:Category:Saggy tits|Saggy tits]]. The problem is it would always be an objective term, even if it's pretty obvious. Then again, maybe it has a point. So please join [[Category talk:Saggy tits|the vote there]] before just deleting it. -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 06:22, 8 December 2007 (EST)

Isn't it the same problem with large/medium areolas and so on? --[[User:Treecko|Treecko]] 21:25, 13 January 2014 (EST)

== Possibly duplicated categories ==
What's the difference between [[:Category:Singers]] and [[:Category:Musicians]]? -[[User:Biguns|Biguns]] 11:06, 14 December 2007 (EST)

:i think musicians include singers. these can be merged. --[[User:Hexvoodoo|Hexvoodoo]] 18:35, 14 December 2007 (EST)

== Cross category search option ? ==

Hi there,

Is there a cross category search option ?

Like : Year of birth AND cup size AND ... AND Natural Breast ?

If not, can you implement it ?

Thanks

Boobpedia - User contributions [en]

Category talk:Categories