User talk:The Honorable

Boobpedia: encyclopedia of big tits

Jump to: navigation, search

(Archive 1)

Contents

[edit] Biobox type

Ah, by the way... Great things ahead... Are you keen on being listed among the MySpace models by using the biobox nonperformer on your userpage? :-) I'm working on the type parameter, which will eliminate all categories from being added if the biobox is used on other pages than articles. This is great, you don't have to pay attention any more if you are just trying an example in the template or user namespace, for example. You cannot mess up the categories any more. If this is fully implemented, you can use one biobox for performers, photographers and fictional characters, just by setting type=fictional or similar. We will only have to take care of one single biobox in the future.
One more question: The new biobox will not add cup categories and so on for non-performers or female photographers with a cup size less than C. But: What about birthdays? Is Russ Meyer to be excluded from the birthdate categories, or are we deleloping towards a more free point of view, where Russ Meyer, for example, would be listed among the birthdays of models on the same day. I introduced categories like "photographer (non-performing)" for occupations, but I think it's stupid to introduce extra birthday categories for non-performers.
I'll keep non-performers out of all categories for the time being (but add them manually on pages like May 15, for instance (Richard Avedon) (yes, my plans of a big boob chronology, see October 23, June 28 or the main page Chronology)), but I think this will be a point to discuss in the future.
Regards
Prophecy 21:47, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Two new categories

Hey, can you add Reality Kings and MILF Next Door as categories as well? Brianna Ray belongs in these two categories, along with a lot of the MILFHunter models.

Thanks for adding it. MILFHunter should also be a subcategory under Realitykings.

I've found/created a total of 8 articles of beautiful, busty women that haven been on MILF Next Door, so I created that category. I've put it under By Website, MILF, Reality porn models, and Reality Kings models. Am I doing it right? Speaking of doing it right, I've went on a frenzy and I've updated/created 8 articles in the past couple of days. Have they been done correctly?

[edit] Nonperformer and Hybrid now included in Biobox new

Hi Honorable,

Same procedure as every day... :-) Before I can change my photographer pages, please copy the new code to the original template. Type=fictional and type=user will follow.

Please go to {{Biobox new/sandbox}},

  • check if the last change has really been done by me, and if so,
  • copy the whole code starting with <includeonly> (fourth line) to {{Biobox new}}.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy

[edit] Double penetration

Hi Honorable,

I saw that you introduced a new boy/girl category. Would you like me to add it to the new biobox?

Regards

Prophecy 20:36, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

OK. Not today, though, I've got to go. I'll add it as soon as I find the time. Prophecy 20:50, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
Go ahead. It's implemented. Prophecy 13:51, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
You can copy the code like before. I also implemented that model birthdays are categorised if only month and day are available. Prophecy 19:17, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Good news

Hi, Honorable-- Good news: I'm online at home! Bad news: the connection is slower than molasses in January. I expect to continue my main up/downloading during my one (or two) free hours during the day, but you can expect me to do more low-bandwidth tinkering-around in the evenings. Also, I'll be able to participate better in discussions/formatting decisions & whatnot at night now-- Hexvoodoo had dropped a note about that to Prophecy and me earlier. Anyway, hopefully I'll be able to devote more time to this worthy project now. Cheers! Dekkappai 13:35, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please copy Biobox

Hi Honorable,

User:Drducker uploaded a picture:

.

He added it to the biobox of his model, so he had to add Category:Image needed manually (because there was some picture. I implemented this in the new biobox, so if there is no picture, the "No Image Available" pic is shown; and the category don't need to be added manually.

Please copy the code from the sandbox to {{Biobox new}}.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 08:57, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Something new...

Hi Honorable,

when I was compiling the Playmates and Penthouse Pets for the Chronology years (for instance 2006), I noticed that Wikipedia has extra bioboxes for them. I thought that this wasn't necessary for us, because our biobox is more powerful. So here's a nice new feature:

  • If you specify playmatemonth and playmateyear, it's now listed in the Performances section of the biobox. Along with an automated link to the Playboy profile and Category:Playboy Playmates being added automatically. See Monica Leigh.
  • petmonth and petyear does the same for Penthouse Pets and adds Category:Penthouse Pets, but without link (there is no official Pet directory, is it?). See Shay Laren.

The Playmate feature generally does the same as {{Playmate}}, but is more tolerant. You can type April, apr, 04 or 4, all results in "April".

Please copy the code from {{Biobox new/sandbox}} starting with <includeonly> to {{Biobox new}}.

Regards

Prophecy 18:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

Hi Honorable,
just in case you did not see the first message, because I sent two shortly one after another. :-) Could you please copy the code to the new biobox? Thanks and regards Prophecy 04:47, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Dear Honorable,
I have Just added several new pictures of Maribel Guardia so you could post them on her page. I tried earlier to place 1 of them into her bio-box but it still seems that I cant seem to get the handle on placeing them so the thumbnails would be visible on the article. So thanks, Red Phoenix 5:10 pm., 26 September 2008 (PST)

[edit] Please remove content

Hi Honorable,

I wanted to move Katarina to her real name page, but there were some difficulties with the protected tags. Please remove the content on Katarina. Otherwise this redirection page will be categorised.

Thanks

Prophecy 19:33, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] New weight template

I've been working on an automatic body type template, and in the process ran into the existing weight and height templates. Both of those needed some serious re-working to be both less fragile, and more legible.

In part as a means to learn templating better, I've done weight, and you can find my work in: Template:Weight/sandbox and Template:Weight_npn. BTW, "npn" stands for "Normalized Parameter Names", which if you don't know, is a fancy way of saying to reduce the complexity of the parameter possibilities; By rolling it into two templates, with one reducing the possible parameters down, and feeding that into the other, it becomes easier to modify, should such become necessary, and easier to understand. For instance, if you wanted to add "kgs" as a kilogram variant, all that would need to be done, would be to add {{{kgs|}}} after the last pipe ("|") on the k line of Template:Weight/sandbox.

Hopefully this will meet with approval, and the sandbox can be rolled onto the weight template. A similar technique for other templates that have multiple parameter names (all of which have the same "meaning") might not be a bad thing to consider also. And unless I hear otherwise, I'll be trying to do the same for the height template, though that one's a bit trickier. ;)

Drducker 02:16, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

I'd like to join the discussion. I'll answer on Drducker's discussion page. Prophecy 07:09, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Affiliate links

Hi Honorable,

just wanted to inform you that User:Define Babe replaces original homepage links with own affiliate links, for example Anette Dawn. Perhaps you might want to go through his other contributions.

Regards

Prophecy 06:50, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

Issue solved, talked to him, links removed. Prophecy 13:34, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
Ok, he told me he was sorry, but obviously he did not care at all: See Brooke Biggs. Honestly said, I don't want to have to go through his contributions every day and remove his affiliate links he replaces our original links with. Prophecy 08:06, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Vandalism

Hi Honorable,

User:12FFF --> Cindy Fulsom (I already removed it).

Regards

Prophecy 07:17, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please copy once again

Hi Honorable,

in some cases the text "Playboy Playmate" has a line break, not nice... See Marketa Janska. I added a non-breaking space, please copy the code from {{Biobox new/sandbox}} to {{Biobox new}}.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 03:25, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Same person?

Do you think this person [1] is an older Tiffany Sloan? In all honesty I am not able to make up my mind.--Bustanut 12:17, 29 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Questions

Hi Honorable,

two questions:

  • I wanted to write an article about the film "Eyes wide shut" (in contrast to the garment), because there are two busty models in it (One already has an article, another one to be written). Does Boobpedia only show articles on "pure" big bust films, or are articles about films with two busty models also ok? Eyes Wide Shut actually has a lot of naked scenes with a lot of boobs. :-) I just saw that you deleted the disambiguation comment on the body page, but I guess that's because the film article did not exist yet.
  • I saw that Bustanut tried to establish a website infobox copied from Wikipedia for his Big Naturals list some time ago. I already have color schemes ready for different kinds of infoboxes (because I think that the biobox template becomes to server-aggressive if we use one template for all articles on Boobpedia). The clothing infobox only was the first one of a series I'm planning. It's much shorter than {{Biobox new}} and takes less server load if applied. I assume I have your ok if I develop the other ones? That makes us really different from Wikipedia, because they don't have a clothing box so far, and our infoboxes are more sophisticated.

Regards

Prophecy 18:03, 29 June 2008 (EDT)

"I think doing articles on specific latex outfits and bras may be too tangential to the point of Boobpedia, though." - Sorry, I did not quite understand that (linguistically). Does tangential mean "relevant" or "irrelevant, only touching a side aspect of boobpedia"? I think you meant the latter one. Well, the latex body was only because I already had the paragraph in my Katja Ehrhardt article. But concerning the bras: Several users have started copying Wikipedia articles about bras, bra conversion, measurements and how to take them - but left them alone, and there is no structure so far. The bra articles are only part of a larger project I'm planning. Freya, for example, is specialised in big bust bras (they only start at D cups), and it's incredible how many Boobpedia models wear them. They have special styles to meet the criteria a big bust bra needs, and there are quotes of many models who talk about bras and such things. Wikipedia is quite superficial at this point, and I thought: "Which site could handle this topic better than Boobpedia which is specialised on big boobs?" I'd like us to become the reference for big boob topics, not Wikipedia... I know, for now the Arabella (bra) article is only a stub which may appear unnecessary at this time. But I noticed many threads in big boob forums who were talking just about special big boobs clothing and special types of bras, that's why I thought this might be interesting. (By the way, the Arabella bra still has a few red links to big bust models in it, including one Japanese. I wonder how Dekkappai could not discover her until today! :-)) Enough said, I'll better start contributing other big boob models. :-)
Regards
Prophecy 18:43, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
Of course I was thinking about that too before creating the article - can bodies qualify for big boob related themes at all? Normally they do not have cups, so they can be worn by any woman. But:
  • Bodies (in my opinion) actually only start to look really nice if the material is stretched by big boobs.
  • Transparent bodies even more accentuate big breasts, because you can see everything through them.
  • Latex as such has become a material that is widely established in the fetish scene - because it accentuates every rounding of the body with its light reflections. That's not far-fetched if one has a look at latex models: Most of them have huge boobs, very often enhanced especially for this purpose (Vanessa Montagne, Natalia Mühlhausen, Bianca Beauchamp, Susan Wayland). When I started the latex category, I was not aware how many "normal" models have worn latex too (even Faith and many Score models of whom you wouldn't suspect this)
Taking all that into consideration, I came to the conclusion that the Eyes Wide Shut body fulfils all three criteria and is therefore an appropriate topic for an article - especially because it has been worn by many big boobs models immediately after its release. I'd appreciate if you could let this article exist for a while and see how the category develops. But I'll pay special attention if I want to create a new body article if it really fulfils notability criteria.
Regards
Prophecy 20:09, 29 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Samantha (Topheavy Amateurs)

Hi Honorable,

I strongly believe that Samantha (Topheavy Amateurs) is already there: Samantha Anderson. The 36G is a common typo, she's 38G. Or am I mistaken? Prophecy 19:35, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Any idea?

Any idea how to view the second to last search result? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Sabree+Lynn%22+iowa&start=0&sa=N I was wanting to view the listing she put on that website, can't figure out how to do so. --Bustanut 19:54, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, that is what I am thinking, or it expired after 120 days. It was obviously there though as the google search result shows.--Bustanut 11:02, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Cassandra Calogera

The following in quotes is from Cassandra Calogera. I thought I would ask you exactly what you want me to do with it on her article.

"1. Why did you choose the name Cassandra Calogera, any significance?

-Cassandra is my best friends name, we were the best of friends when i lived in Connecticut...and i always thought her name was beautiful. I wanted a last name and i wanted it to start with a c, i also wanted something that sounded italian. i didnt want a typical porn name, i wanted something unique and classy...a friend suggest calogera. i liked it and put the two together!

2. Why did you decide to start your career in the adult industry, any key events that led you to do so?

-i had a boyfriend that i was with for six years who was completely addicted to porn, he actually preferred to masturbate than to have sex with me. i wanted sex about twice a day and sometimes we would go 4 months without having sex. this gave me a really bad self esteem...i thought i wasnt pretty or sexy and i got into porn to see if people found me attractive. i liked the attention

3. What does the tatoo you have symbolize? -i was on a random internet site one day and i saw a picture of my tattoo...i printed it out and got in tattooed on my hip. simple as that! unfortantly that same asshole boyfriend has the same one on his wrist.

4. If you can think of anything else that I missed feel free to let me know. -keep an eye out for me in the industry...im a girl who really enjoys sex, i have a job that perfectly suits my personality and i plan to stick around" --Bustanut 11:13, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

If you want to call it an interview, it was just a myspace message.--Bustanut 14:28, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

Go for it. I am finished up with the Big Naturals article.. that took HOURS. Only missing one date and three names for the movies. Pretty good if I do say so myself. --Bustanut 14:51, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please copy code to Biobox new

Hi Honorable,

the following changes have been made:

  • Vaginal and Blowjob are categorised as well, there are new categories for this.
  • Thin has been replaced by Slim, according to discussion with Drducker and Hexvoodoo. Any old Thin entries are automatically converted to Slim as soon as the code has been copied; no work has to be done.

Thanks for copying from {{Biobox new/sandbox}} to {{Biobox new}}and regards

Prophecy 12:41, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

Very kind, I just noticed that the Penthouse Pet year of Nikki Nova is not correct. I'll tell you when I've fixed that. Thanks Prophecy 14:19, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
Ok, done, go ahead - thanks. Prophecy 14:32, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Have you considered?

I thought maybe you might want to consider this. I found it a while back. Might help with the cost of keeping the site running. Instead of not getting payed for all the links to Reality King pages, why not get payed for it, and have it go towards the site. [2] Let me know what you think, just an idea I had. Plus I thought if you signed up for it, you might be able to find the missing names since they might not have removed the women from the affilate site.--Bustanut 16:23, 4 July 2008 (EDT) Will do. --Bustanut 19:10, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Debbie Quarry

Hi Honorable,

I wanted to add the new biobox to Debbie Quarry, but when I save the page it says that there's a spam link in it. Could you verify this, please? It does not seem to be spam. Prophecy 01:02, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Birthdays

Hi, Honorable. Any thoughts of including a "Today's birthdays" on the mainpage? Either as a list or-- probably better-- as a link to the appropriate page? It's a thought. Regards. Dekkappai 13:09, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

"once there are categories for all the days"
Done! Since July 4. (No, I'm not American.) :-) Six days are empty though. There are no performers that celebrate their birthday on these days, but I created the categories anyway, so there's no dead link. A link to today's birthdays can be directly copied out of {{Birthdays}}: 
[[:Category:{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}} birthdays|Today's birthdays]]
gives Today's birthdays.
Ah, by the way, {{Months}} has something similar, but hidden if the page does not exist yet. So you can add the link and be sure it never leads to a non-existing page: 
{{#ifexist:{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}|[[{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}|Today in boob history]]}}
gives . (Displayed today, July 6, because there are events, but not tomorrow, for example.)
Regards - Prophecy 17:22, 6 July 2008 (EDT)
Good deal! BP is well on its way to becoming the ultimate reference tool for boob-lore! I'm trying to fight off the urge to start another list, and blue-linking all those red-links I've created at them. Wow, I'm coming across some fantastic Japanese models! Tough work, but somebody's got to do it ;-) Cheers! Dekkappai 19:48, 6 July 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, I just noticed it. This looks really really cool, thanks for implementing it! Above all, because we have a fancier chronology system than Wikipedia. It's not that messed up, because I was able to create it from scratch and avoid some inconsistencies of Wikipedia. Er - do you know of some boob-related events that took place on July 7, by chance? :-) Prophecy 19:49, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] References

Hi Honorable,

please have a look at the discussion of Drducker and me at User talk:Drducker#Refs to foot and User talk:Prophecy#Refs to foot. We'd like to hear your opinion on references at the very bottom of a page or just at the end of an article. I first was against the bottom thing, but I come from print media formatting and there it is common consensus that refereces have to be at the bottom of a page. It was only Wikipedia that introduced references at the end of an article. So should we blindly follow Wikipedia or develop a style of our own? Please answer only at User talk:Drducker#Refs to foot so that we can continue the discussion there.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 20:54, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

This has gotten a bit too large to be handled in the User_talk space, so I've migrated this to, consolidated in, and continued at: Help_talk:How_should_the_articles_be_written. Drducker 04:45, 7 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Another happy BP story

Hi Honorable. The ID Sara request has been filled (or started) with the Emi Tsukino article. I don't know what we do when a question/request has been satisfied, but maybe you can move the ID Sara request to Emi's talk page and delete the info request? Regards. Dekkappai 00:54, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please unprotect

Hi Honorable,

please unprotect {{Biobox}}. There is no performer page left that uses it. Transformation is complete: Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Biobox

What I have in mind:

  • I'll copy the code from {{Biobox new}} to {{Biobox}}, introducing a few ameliorations. This will cause no server load, because there's no page left that links to the template.
  • When it's done, I'll ask you to replace the code of {{Biobox new}} by a redirect. So the people will be able to use the simple Biobox on their pages. There's no reason to keep the "new" in the name, because it's not new anymore. I'll adapt the documentation page, and everything is like before - with a simple straight name for the biobox.

Regards

Prophecy 20:56, 14 July 2008 (EDT)


[edit] Server Problems?

I've been experiencing problems loading pages on Boobpedia. I thought it just my browser and/or internet. But other sites worked, except this specific one. I was working on an article and lost all my work. Which is was sort of frustrating. Just thought I ask and/or let you know about this problem. Apara 23:15, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

I already answered on Apara's user page. It was my fault. Prophecy 23:31, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Just in case you wonder...

Hi Honorable,

you will notice that I will be creating a whole lot of templates. More exactly: One template for each nationality. Although this might seem to be a huge waste of server resources, it is the contrary:

At the moment, we have 66 nationalities on Boobpedia. The template which generates the small flags is quite big and causes the server to do a lot of unnecessary work, because it checks all of the 66 countries before displaying a flag. So each time a biobox is used, this will be checked too.

Even worse: Each time a single tiny nationality is added and the template is saved, the server crashes, because it has to replace the big template on more than 2,000 pages.

At first I thought that the Wikipedia system of a template for each country is contraproductive, but it is not. I tested it with the photographers, because each photographer already had a template of his own:

  • When a new photographer (nationality) is added, the mother template does not have to be changed. No more server crashes.
  • When a photographer (nationality) is mentioned in an article, only one check is made instead of 66.
  • Very nice side effect: The new system is extremely versatile. For example, {{photographer|Gil Perron|link=1|location=1}} gives Gil Perron (website), Montreal, Québec, Canada like before. On the other hand, one single parameter causes the template to look like this: {{photographer|Gil Perron|header=1}} gives
Gil Perron (Montreal, Québec, Canada)
Photographer, lighting designer (fetish, fashion, glamour)
Main article: Gil Perron
Categories Gil Perron models · Gil Perron photos

Only one server call. The system can be used for everything: Nationalities, photographers, bras - everything that is similar in type and can need a header.

The changes will take a while and at the end, I will produce one last server crash. But I think it's worth it. I'll write messages to editors around before applying the changes.

Regards

Prophecy 12:20, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please add a line.

Hi Honorable,

I created two more How-tos and made them simpler. I think it's a good idea to add the following line to Help:Contents#How do I add a page to Boobpedia?, at the end of the chapter:

For a simple how-to guide that creates a predefined page for you, see [[New article]].

This could avoid many initial mistakes that are made by beginners.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 07:42, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Wha' happened?

Was it just me, or was Boobpedia just down for a day and a half? Judging from the Recent changes, it wasn't just me... Dekkappai 21:09, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Happened with me also. I can't seem to edit anything. Even though it says I had. But I see no changes. It also says I'm not logged in. Then it says I am. Apara 20:13, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
Right-- the server's acting very peculiar... I've uploaded several images that then do not appear on the pages which link to them... then they do appear if I make a minor change to the text of the article... And I can't ever get a "Show preview" to work-- I have to "Save page" and hope there are no mistakes... strange things happening... Dekkappai 21:08, 22 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Request: Change of naming policy

Hi Honorable,

I just saw Eva Wyrwal being moved to Iga Wyrwał by another editor. And I cannot say that I have something against it. Reason:

  • The purpose of the rule that article names should avoid foreign characters was to keep the URLs "tidy".
  • But: As the number of articles increased, we had to introduce names like Kelly Kay (Bang Bros). The full URL for such an article name with brackets: http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Kelly_Kay_%28Bang_Bros%29.
  • So the if we really followed the rule to only have "clean" URLs, brackets would not be allowed either.

I suggest that we explicitly allow article names with foreign characters and add redirects for the variations with "normal" characters. Wikipedia does the same. This would be the correct way. The model names would all be displayed correctly in categories and lists, but could easily be found like before if you search for them and are not able to type the foreign characters on your keyboard.

It's my opinion that the clean link rule has no base anymore. Links from external sites leading to Boobpedia work fine in either way:

Please tell me your opinion.

Prophecy 16:31, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

This is an issue that would affect my editing as well. Currently I am naming articles with difficult names using a "How I feel at the moment" approach-- a model like Yuuri Kimitsu should probably really be Yūri Kimitsu, as Wikipedia would have it. But I've named similar articles "Yuri Kimitsu", using a more informal-- but probably more common among English-speaking fans-- Romanization... If it's up for a vote, I say we include the non-standard characters, with redirects from the informal namings that will no doubt be searched on... I hope we never become as absurdly rigid as Wikipedia can be on things like this, but I also hope we lean towards making our articles as academically respectable as articles on subjects such as these can be ;-) Dekkappai 18:16, 23 July 2008 (EDT)
  • Besides URL aesthetics, we try to avoid accented characters in page titles because it causes some page maintenance things to behave strangely. Instead of creating a redirect for "Yūri Kimitsu" (with "ū"), it would be better to use it in the opening of the article, and in the biobox's "name=" field. Parentheses haven't caused any problems (yet...), so they're OK. The Honorable 18:35, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Replace Biobox new, quick! :-)

Hi Honorable,

as announced, I took {{Nationality}} out of the Biobox. Nationality categories are still given, but the template is not used any longer. So I can rework {{Nationality}} without server crashes.

Please copy {{Biobox new/sandbox}} (after <includeonly>) to {{Biobox new}}.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 06:03, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please unprotect

Hi Honorable,

please unprotect {{Film}}. I have replaced the template by {{Film info}} and changed all links from pages using this template.

I need the {{Film}} template for a new idea: All filmographies on Boobpedia with a unified layout and very simple to write. Please see User Talk:Dekkappai#Just in case... for details.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 09:27, 30 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Add picture gallery...Robyn Foxx

I would like to add a picture gallery here. Is that possible? If so, how do I do it? I have a lot of pictures that I could post but I cant decide which one to have as my main photo...so when in doubt...add the, all...lol

Thank you, Robyn Foxx --Robyn Foxx 23:21, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

[edit] LaWanda Page

You forgot to zorch the image. Randy 16:36, 2 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please remove

Hi Honorable,

please remove the protect tags from Joana (attention, I mean from the redirect page with one single N!). I redirected the page to Joanna, but couldn't remove them. Otherwise the redirect page is categorised and listed in the categories. Thanks. Prophecy 15:43, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Another ethical dilemma

Hi, Honorable. I've been doing some preliminary work on Russ Meyer and his films, and have a little bit of a question on boob-ethics... Not all of Meyer's films were as extremely boob-centric as he is known for. The Seven Minutes, for example, was a bit of a flop directed by Meyer, and he attributed its failure to the lack of a busty female lead. Nevertheless, being a Meyer film, he did manage to squeeze a few large bosoms into the project. The question is: Does a film like this deserve an article here on BP? My first thought was, with someone as closely linked to big-boob entertainment as Meyer, we want to be as thorough as possible on his career. Another thought is that on a subject like Meyer, we should strive to be better and more complete than that other, much larger, Wiki project. :-) But I can see too how a film like this would be considered beyond BP's scope. Any thoughts? Dekkappai 03:08, 9 August 2008 (EDT)

Thanks Honorable. Right, I was thinking about deleting it, but then I think, "This is by RUSS MEYER, the patron saint of BP!" I'll forge ahead. :-) Dekkappai 16:07, 9 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Updates to The Honorable from skilled Wufei.

I know Im fairly new yet Im pretty good with computer code. If you can see this, changing the ethnicity of Black to African to encompass all people of African descent i.e. Carribean, America, especially considering the formality of other ethnicities and the fact that the term Black usually only means people of African-American descent. In addition changing the name of the two seperate ethnicities Latina & Black into one group Afro-Latina since people of Afro-Latina descent usually refer to themselves as such.

I was already thinking of a way to change "Black" to the more neutral form "African" for some reasons of political correctness, but skipped it, because I only started two articles of performers of this ethnicity. As to the way our (maybe technically, but not socially) skilled Wufei wanted to force this renaming, I can only say: Redirecting Apara's page to a Spanish swear word page is not the way to make oneself popular or even respected or credible. Changing all ethnicities from Black to African is one thing, one could have told him that it might be a better idea to discuss this first on a general discussion page. I'd have supported this renaming. But starting to vandalise and to quarrel instead of trying to resolve the conflict in a decent way only leads my to one suggestion: Plese ban this person.
Regards
Prophecy 11:30, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Another issue...

Hi, Honorable. I bring another ethical dilemma for your consideration. This is what I get for stepping outside of Asia :-) A certain other editor has expressed the thought, commonly held at Wikipedia, that IMDb is "unreliable" and should not be used for any sourcing here. (Actually Wikipedia does use it for cast and credit info, and I am of the opinion that some sourcing is better than no sourcing... As long as we list the source, the reader can judge for him or herself the "reliability" of the sourced info.) I'm all for us using the most "reliable" sourcing, and I do strive to get the best sourcing available. But here's the problem that comes up: "Reliable" sources, typically, do not give our fringe subjects much respect, and do not devote much time to making sure the data they give are accurate or complete. Fan-edited sources, such as IMDb, edited by people with a strong interest in these films, often are more accurate than these more-respected sources. An example: In this edit I have replaced the IMDb citation and data with that from the British Film Institute-- a respected source of film scholarship. Here's the problem: I haven't seen the film, but the IMDb-editor mentions that Chesty Morgan's role name is often listed incorrectly. BMI gives that incorrect (according to IMDb) information. What to do? My gut instinct is to get the damned movie eventually, and source it off the credits. Or maybe one of our editors already has it, and could source it off the DVD? But what to do in the meantime? Dekkappai 17:10, 11 August 2008 (EDT)

Apara & I had a similar situation a little earlier. In this edit Apara removed a role name based on the "reliable" AFI Catalog, claiming that, based on his own viewing of the film, the listing was incorrect. Again, while the AFI is no doubt considered a more "reliable" source than Apara :-), I do trust Apara's opinion, as a fan of the genre, and I trust that he has more interest in getting information on a Russ Meyer film right than the AFI probably did at the time of the compiliation of the catalog. In this case, I left Apara's deletion of the incorrect role-name, but restored the AFI sourcing for the cast members. In other words, I retained the AFI citation and used only the accurate information, but ommitted the inaccurate information. My thoughts are that, since our subject is on the fringe of scholarship, we must have more flexible sourcing standards than Wikipedia-- we should lean towards "truth" (that Wikipedian no-no) over "reliable sourcing", while still using the most "reliable" source that gets things right. Strictly enforcing a Wikipedia-based sourcing and reliability standard (not to mention their arbitrary and nonsensical application of "notability"), will result in some gross absurdities at BP. Dekkappai 18:47, 11 August 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for the input, Honorable-- obviously I was mainly thinking things through outloud to myself up there. Right, IMDb is not perfect, but neither are the "reliable" sources, and on subjects like ours, IMDb is sometimes more accurate than the "reliable" sources. I guess we go with the best source we have, and if that's IMDb, or something even less reputable, so be it, as long as we give a citation to where we got the info. I consider the "unreliable" accusation to be borderline trolling anyway, since I'm one of the editors who habitually sources his edits. And yet the editor who expressed concern sees no problem with lack of sourcing, but has accused my sources of being 1) poorly formatted, 2) spam, 3), vandalism, and now 4) "unreliable"... I guess some people just need to stir up trouble to keep themselves busy. (To Wikipedia with them!) Regards. :-) Dekkappai 22:19, 11 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Nikita

Hello

Could you delete "Nikita (MC Nudes)" for me I didn't realize there was already a profile for her.

Thanks,

Marcus


[edit] Cassidy/Maxi 32JJ

Both women are not the same person. Both appear on http://www.topheavyamateurs.com/ So it wouldnt make sense if they featured the same person with different bra sizes and names. From observation, of their bodies. They don't look anythign alike. So if you could, remake the article or let me know. If I can recreate it. Apara 21:13, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

Were they both "your" articles, Apara? And someone put a "delete" tag on one without questioning or notifying you... or anyone else? If so, this is extremely disturbing, and something I hope never becomes common practice here... Dekkappai 22:53, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
Cassidy article I made. I made it when I took a "break" from doing pin ups. I didn't notice the deletion requestion. Until I saw it was deleted. So I have no clue what happened. Apara 00:17, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
Sounds like someone slapped a "Delete" tag on your article without knowing all the facts or bothering to ask anyone about them... Maybe that's not what happened, but if it is, I think it's a very dangerous precedent, and something we should strongly discourage. Dekkappai 02:08, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
...Had a suspicion who it might have been... Again, I think this-- labeling other editors' work for deletion without so much as a notification or discussion-- absolutely intolerable. Dekkappai 22:59, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

Note: I notified the culprit of my strong feelings against his tagging others' work for deletion without discussion here. He admits no wrongdoing and engages in troll-like argument designed to continue argument for argument's sake without addressing the issue. I notice he attempted to delete another editors' work here and here (removing the photo from the article), but was reverted by a third editor. He gives every indication of continuing on his course. This user has managed to annoy just about every regular editor here at some time or other, but this time has engaged in tactics which, if gone unchecked, will be very harmful to the project. The only reason this article was retrieved was that its creator happened to be a regular, and happened to noticed its deletion. As BP gets larger such completely needless deletions will be harder to detect, and will result in loss of work, ill-will towards the project, and more and more in-fighting. I've seen this happen at Wikipedia-- though even at Wikipedia the editor whose work is tagged is notified, and a discussion can take place. Since the culprit shows no remorse, and will probably continue on his way unless checked, I do believe discipline is called for in this case. Dekkappai 10:57, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Note2: here the editor makes another lengthy and pointless stylistic-nit-picking and re-wording edit, and he intentionally mislabels it "Added titles including references". I believe this editor's antics have gone on too long. Dekkappai 11:11, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
I re-checked the edit, and notice that buried within all the usual pointless style changes he's added a "reflist", so I guess that's what the edit summary referred to. Dekkappai 17:58, 21 August 2008 (EDT)


[edit] Harrison Marks/Naked as Nature Intended

I was going to start a new article on the film "Naked as Nature Intended". The film doesn't really have any "big bust" women in the film. Maybe one them was a C cup. Also Harrison isn't known only for big bust women, but pin ups of all kinds. About 50% are big bust. So I was wonder if this new article would be appropriate here. Apara 23:51, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Moving photographer pages

Hi Honorable,

thanks for editing Gréta Istvándi, but unfortunately photographer pages (she is a photographer, too) have to have the original person's name as article name - otherwise the whole system with {{Photographer}} does not work and produces dead links. I'll move her back to her original name for now.

I did find a solution for this issue and implemented it in the {{Film}} template (film templates can have different names than articlse), but for photographers it does not work so far.

Please don't change photographer pages' names until this works for them too.

Regards

Prophecy 09:44, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] We lost our fake tits...

Hi Honorable,

due to an error in the code of {{Biobox new}}, our Fake tits category has been de-populated. Please copy the code from {{Biobox new/sandbox}} (after <includeonly>) to {{Biobox new}}. I have fixed the bug.

Thanks

Prophecy 22:09, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Please remove protect tags

Hi Honorable,

please remove all protect tags in Lisa Miller. They make it impossible to move sections or to rearrange them. You can add them again when the work is done, although I think it's not necessary as most users have started to add them themselves.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 08:56, 4 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Featured article

Hi Honorable,

please have a look at Featured article and tell us if there are certain commercial reasons which have to be considered when choosing an article for the Main page, or if it's possible that editors can vote freely for an article, which will, if consent is reached, be published on the Boobpedia front page. And of course, as an editor, you can leave comments on the suggested articles too. :-)

Regards

Prophecy

[edit] Vandalistic edit summaries?

Hi, Honorable. I noticed in the Kelly Shibari that Hex had removed some puerile vandalism, but that the message remains in the edit summary. In the event that the model comes across our article (she's American, so it's not entirely unlikely), I'd think this would cast a negative light on our project. Also-- the vandal who added this ("This account was comprimised by...") is apparently known for leaving this type of idiocy at other sites, and has gathered his own idiot-fan-base, so leaving it is something like leaving graffiti on a public wall-- a source of pride among idiots that their mark remains... So, is there a way to remove this? (Or does it really matter much?) Regards. Dekkappai 16:14, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Cassandra Calogera

Hi Honorable,

CalogAra is a typo. Please delete the remaining protected text on Cassandra Calogara and add protect tags to the interview on Cassandra Calogera.

Thanks and regards

Prophecy 07:41, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Slash

I was wondering, since I was saving another Prodded article at the same time, and BP was telling me I had no such subpage... All's well that ends well though :) Dekkappai 20:27, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Sybian

Can we get a page for sybians?

Well neither are double penetrations.
Yeah.

[edit] Interviews

How do women get selected for interviews here? And how do they get interviewed? It seems as though all of them just talk about their upbringing, when they hit puberty, and when they lost their virginity. Can't we add some more spice to that? Cost 01:54, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

I posted Holly West's email on her discussion page. Also, I have the email address of Brianna Ray and Lexi Jade. And, you can try asking the Dreamnet girls on the Dreamnet forums.Cost 21:32, 30 November 2008 (EST)

[edit] Please re-protect

Hi Honorable,

please re-protect {{Note}}. I don't know what the last change was good for, but I think the template is too important to be left unprotected.

Prophecy 13:17, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Fair use images

I've been noticing some editors (mostly new), have been uploading and adding a good amount of fair use images on articles. Heather Hooters for example. Seems far too many for us to use on an article. Just thought I'd let you know incase you haven't noticed. Apara 19:12, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Besides the new editors, I may be one of the guilty party in the new article on Pocha Pocha Princess Pretty: Usagi. I tried to choose images that illustrate the text of the article. But I must admit, I find the woman captivating, and would probably stoop to making any excuse to put up another image of her. So if someone has to reign me in, feel free to do so. :-) Dekkappai 22:34, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
P.S. I was very much aware that I was "guilding the lily" with the "The end." image. But I just couldn't help myself. ;) Dekkappai 22:38, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh come on, Honorable... have a heart! OK, I'll see what I can do. This won't be easy though :-( Dekkappai 13:00, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
Maybe I could start an article on each chapter of the DVD?...Dekkappai 13:11, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
OK, I've done what I could. It's down to 4 in the article, 5 counting the cover image. If you have to shoot down another one, do it quickly and mercifully, while I'm not watching. :-( Dekkappai 13:23, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
On further thought though, this does bring up some questions... One great thing about Boobpedia is that the rules are hard-set and not subject to gross inconsistency, bias and interminable argument/interpretation, as are so many of Wikipedia's.
That said: A flat "3 or 4 fair use images per article, period" will probably create some awkward situations. An unsourced one-sentence stub on a model gets four images, while a lengthy, carefully cited article on a film, which would benefit from several screenshots, is given the same four-image limit? With four, the model stub would seem bloated with images while the film one would be unnecessarily cramped. And even Wikipedia (last I knew anyway) has a policy that allows the fair-use image depicts an event that cannot be shown with a free image (such as a screensho of a scene in a film, described in the article). I know I was pushing the envelope with the Usagi Minagi video, but still, I did make an attempt to justify the inclusion of most of the images. And it seems to me that important films-- really important ones, like some of Meyer's-- will eventually call for illustrations of scenes/themes being discussed. Also, my practice of putting film poster/video cover images in actress filmographies-- these images are excluded from the total article image-limit, I hope? Because they are illustrations of the film/video, not the actress.
The other apparently hard-and-fast rule that can create some odd situations is the "18 or over" rule... Saaya Irie, an under-aged bikini model, was removed as being under 18. OK, so far so good... But we have Fuko, who posed topless under-aged, and these images are all over the 'net. Eventually someone is going to try to upload one. Do we remove it under this policy? I would say "yes". But wait, it gets stickier: Rosina Revelle, currently under work as a Feature Article, apparently posed nude under-aged. So, is this one OK? I'd say "yes", but I'm not sure how we reconcile this inconsistency with the "18 or over" rule. It seems a bit inconsistent that an under-aged bikini model is banned, while an under-aged topless model is allowed, because she posed a few decades ago... Or am I over-thinking it? Anyway, some thoughts, for what their worth. Dekkappai 18:22, 17 September 2008 (EDT)

Another example, Joanna. Apara 20:54, 20 September 2008 (EDT)

Hey, I had NOTHING to do with Joanna! ;-) Dekkappai 22:48, 20 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Lesbian

Can we add that as a category?

There's already a "lesbian" field in the new biobox-- doesn't that point to some kind of "lesbian performance" category? (I can't find it, but it should, I'd think...) Dekkappai 14:10, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Lesbian

Done. You can copy the code from the sandbox into the real template.It does, however, not link to the category, because we have softcore, dildo and fisting. The category is added, but we would have to have three different lesbian categories to link to, so I left it unlinked. Prophecy 18:29, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Japanese Amazon

Hi, Honorable. I noticed at the Alice Hoshi, that the Japanese Amazon link has a Boobpedia tag on it. (It is in one of those "protect" tags which I hate...) I assume BP gets some sort of revenue from this kind of thing? If so, I'd be perfectly happy to add this tag to Japanese Amazon links at pages as I create them. These days I haven't been giving Amazon links for actresses so much, but for video articles as sourcing. I use the simplified Amazon link. Let me know how to add a BP-donation to them if it will help the cause. Dekkappai 18:44, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Minka's classification

Hi, Honorable. I notice we have Minka down as a "South Korean adult model and porn star". She apparently is South Korean, by birth (nationality may have changed), and she is an adult model and porn star. My quibble with this though, is that the sentence implies she works within the South Korean adult entertainment industry, which, as far as I know, she doesn't. She works in the U.S. industry... I hope eventually to be able to do some work on South Korea's adult entertainment industry which is kept out of outsider eyes, so extremely difficult to research. The only article I've been able to start so far is on Na Hye-ra, whose video I was lucky enough to see in Korea in the early '90s, and I clipped that little article out of a local paper. Maybe next time I'm over there I'll be able to step out of the family eye and grab a few choice items :-) My preference would be to call her a "South Korean-born adult model and porn star..." then in the article make clear that she works in the U.S. industry. That way she won't be mis-grouped into the real South Korean industry when/if we're ever able to get some substantial work done on that country. Anyway, I don't want to make this into another black / African thing-- and promise not to go around moving pages and lobbing Korean swear-words at other editors :-)-- but I do think it's important to distinguish that she works in the U.S. industry, not Korean. But if other disagree, or think I'm splitting hairs, of course, it's no big deal. Dekkappai 13:13, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Usage of the unreferenced template

I don't understand - if it is considered vandalism to use this tag in places that have no references, why did you create it in the first place? -Biguns 12:55, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

Hi, Honorable. Of course I wouldn't have labeled the banner-- objectionable though I find it-- as "vandalism" had it been put in place by another editor. However, the editor in question unapologetically tosses around accusations of "vandalism", "spam" etc. to other editors, so surely he doesn't mind these terms being applied to his own edits. :-) About these banners not defacing articles: I am of the opinion that they do deface articles, and that if an editor has issues with article's sourcing, then he should fix it, not deface it with a banner and expect others to do his work. I believe this is a bad and lazy habit which we should not carry over from Wikipedia. If the editor doesn't have time to source the article when he notices it, he can make a note to himself, something like my own User:Dekkappai#Stubs_needing_filmographies_.2F_expanding" list which serves to remind me of red-links I've upgraded to stubs, which I will later return to to fill out as articles. Dekkappai 17:39, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
First of all, please just reply within the topic. Secondly, when did I claim "vandalism" or "spam" for naive actions? Thirdly, even though you don't like Wikipedia, I'm sure the ban on personal attacks applies just the same in here. Thirdly, you say maybe it's not vandalism after all, and a few lines later break down and admit you do think it's vandalism (even though you don't use the word). Last but not least, when will you understand it's not your private site and that the wiki concept doesn't sit well with your beliefs? You would be much happier to have a private site where you make the rules and rightfully ban anyone who crosses your path (because you pay the bills). -Biguns 04:43, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
First: Generally I don't care to respond directly to you, because I find your edits, your tone and replies to be constantly condescending and irritating. Second: [3] for one, Third: I have no idea what you're talking about, Fourth: I love the Wikipedia concept and contributed to it for nearly three years, and created some Good Articles and a Feature Article which was on the main page. And I have been at Boobpedia longer than you, and have had no problems with any editor here-- except one. I have absolutely no problem with the Wiki-concept. You are the only one who has ever implied I do-- and you do so constantly whenever I have a disagreement you. As other editors have pointed out, you seem to identify yourself with Boobpedia, and that's probably why you seem to equate my disagreements with you as disagreements with Wikipedia/Boobpedia. My only trouble with Wikipedia was a few self-important jackasses who abuse the system to turn it against itself and make it less than it could be. They set themselves into power and, rather than contribute constructively, micro-edit the work of others, and decide what material stays and what material goes-- even in subjects about which they have absolutely no knowledge or interest. I worked perfectly happily at Wikipedia for nearly three years, and continue to do so here at Boobpedia. We only have one here who seems to be working towards making the project less than it could be, and that one is obviously not me-- By and large, I work on my own articles, I work with other editors, consulting with them, improving their articles when I can (by "improving" I mean adding text and sourcing, not nit-picking stylistic changes), and I don't try to push them around with constant nit-picking, tagging their s work for deletion without notification, etc. I recommend you do the same. This is the last I'll reply to you on this matter, since you appear to enjoy a pointless argument better than working on the project, and I see no point in continuing this discussion. Dekkappai 09:39, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Wiki's big-bust list

Hi, Honorable. It looks like Wikipedia has finally deleted the "List of big-bust performers". I intend to salvage my section on Japan and build it into a historical overview of the Japanese scene here at Boobpedia. (I think once I've got the list mostly blue-linked, I'll be able to build a decent history of the genre in Japan with lots of reference to real people, with existing articles. Hopefully it'll be something of broad coverage and interest, though something that would never survive at Wiki in the current anti-content zeitgeist.) Others may find some sourcing or writing in the Introduction to be of some use. If anyone wants to see it, I've saved it at: User:Dekkappai/Wikipedia_deletions#List_of_big-bust_models_and_performers_.286th_nomination.29. It's all ours now, I guess :-) Dekkappai 10:30, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

By the way, I don't know if you are aware of any of the history behind the list and its deletion, but this was consistently one of Wikipedia's top-20 most-viewed pages. Hopefully its deletion will bring more traffic to Boobpedia ;-) Dekkappai 10:53, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Another ethical dilemma

I come to lay another decision at your feet today, Honorable. Wikipedia is a good source for starter-articles, and we note when we borrow articles from them. You may or may not know, I've had a falling-out with the Wikipedia community at large, and have stopped contributing there, but I do mine the deletions for discarded material to place here. Here's my question: I've noticed a fellow Japanese-fan acquaintance of mine at Wikipedia is doing some terrific work in the Japanese adult entertainment area, and has started a couple excellent articles on subjects on which we only have stubs. I'd like to use the raw material-- the sourcing, interviews, filmographies, etc.-- that he has put together, but use it to write our own article. If I do this-- take the sourcing, but write our own article-- should I still credit Wikipedia? Dekkappai 18:18, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

Well... I'm mining it for sources, but I'm not using it as a source... I'll be rewriting completely without looking at the text of the Wiki article any more than I can possibly avoid... so I'll plan on not citing Wiki. Thanks for the input. Dekkappai 18:55, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
I think most users only use the "based on Wikipedia" GFDL message as a source for easy links to Wikipedia. If you really don't like the word "based", you can always open an "external links" section and use [[wikipedia:article]] as a link. -Biguns 05:10, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Victoria Valentino

Would you suggest moving Victoria Valentino to "Victoria Valentino (porn star)", and make a new article on Victoria Valentino the Playboy Playmate? Or just make a new article called "Victoria Valentino (Playmate)"? Apara 05:08, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Mysterious image deletions

Hi, Honorable. I noticed a few mysterious image deletions just now. One (Image:FBS-43.jpg) was improperly linked from its thumb (Image:FBS-43s.jpg), leaving it looking like an orphan. This has been fixed and re-uploaded. Another (Image: Rui Ayukawa.jpg) was actually a video cover to show an actress of whom I could not find a regular portrait. I do try to find portraits if at all possible, but Hex has told me that video covers will do if they cannot be located. Still, I do prefer to use the video ID# to identify these images. So, technically, it was mis-named, and the deletion takes care of that. It has been re-named (Image:ARZ-026s.jpg) and re-uploaded. The third, (Image:Kumiko Hayama.jpg) just confuses me. I'm pretty sure this was just a portrait from Tokyo Topless, properly sourced and licensed as Fair use. I could cobble the information together and re-upload it, but, since it seems to have been wrongly deleted, maybe you could just restore it? Thanks. Dekkappai 01:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

Same goes for Image:Jusd021.jpg and Image:55t28056.jpg. Two Ellen Joe video images which may have appeared to be orphans due to a typo in the code, which has been fixed. Please restore if you can. Dekkappai 01:41, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Thanks, Honorable. I think everything is straightened out (you restored one I replaced, I've marked it for deletion), except for Image:Kumiko Hayama.jpg. Oddly, the image says it is not linked to any page. But if you look at the article on Kumiko Hayama, there it is... Dekkappai 02:50, 9 October 2008 (EDT)


[edit] Interview

I recently that in contact with Cheron from Topheavyamateurs about doing a interview. How does this work for Boobpedia? Is there a series of questions I or you/Hex ask or make some up? Also are you or Hex willing do it or should/can I do it myself? Apara 04:39, 15 November 2008 (EST)

[edit] link trade..?

==

I am friends of Big Breast Forum, saw he was linking to you and would like to do so as well.

Let me know if you want to swap, I'll throw yours up right now.

Nice site you have going.

See ya.

www.mybigbreasts.net

[edit] Baby Got Boobs

For whatever reason, whenever I put down "Baby Got Boobs models" on an article, it comes up red.Cost 17:55, 20 November 2008 (EST)

Thanks! That is going to get really annoying.Cost 19:37, 20 November 2008 (EST)
Shouldn't these pages be merged?Cost 16:04, 23 November 2008 (EST)

[edit] Speacial Links

I've noticed that some sites have "speacial" links with protect tags around them. What are they for? Should all Brazzers sites have them, because not all do.Cost 19:43, 20 November 2008 (EST)

[edit] Tokyo Topless article/ category

Hi, Honorable. Is merging the entire Tokyo Topless article into the category really the way to go? Seems to me more logical to have a separate article on the site with a link to the model category at the bottom of the page. The category links to the article in the one-line description at the top, "Models who appeared at Tokyo Topless". Is this going to be our standard way of dealing with subjects & their categories? If so, we should probably change all similar situations to reflect the new Tokyo Topless one-- e.g., put the article on Russ Meyer into the "Russ Meyer actresses" category-- But, really, it doesn't seem right to me. If you want info on Tokyo Topless, you go to the article. If you want a listing of actresses who appeared there, you go to the category. Tokyo Topless has the duplicate model listing, but that's to designate the different genres of models-- Fuzoku, AV, foreign, etc. Dekkappai 22:21, 24 November 2008 (EST)

No problem, Honorable. Prophecy and I both agreed the idea was worth considering, but we also both agreed that, for a variety of reasons, it was not a good idea. Anyway, you can always expect to get a squawk out of me if you experiment with the Japanese articles :) Regards. Dekkappai 19:53, 30 November 2008 (EST)

[edit] Justine Joli

I just reopened the Justine Joli page. This time I put all the correct info and citations. However, I can't seem to be able to get the age citation in properly.Cost 23:56, 25 November 2008 (EST)

I believe Apara fixed the problem. The reference for the DOB wasn't displaying correctly, but it is now. Cost 11:36, 27 November 2008 (EST)

[edit] References

How do you do references properly? Can you give me a link that will show me how? And can we have mroe than one reference for an item? Cost 11:05, 1 December 2008 (EST)

I did one on Mariah Milano, but it doesn't seem to be working. =/ Cost 23:08, 3 December 2008 (EST)

[edit] Ethnic Groups

What would you recommend for someone who is descents from Pakistan and/or Indian? For example: Ann Stephens. Apara 22:10, 1 December 2008 (EST)

[edit] 40 Inch Plus

This website is under Reality Kings' umbrella. You need to change the template for its link as it says that 40 Inch Plus is part of the All Site Access network, which it isn't. Cost 20:16, 2 December 2008 (EST)

Retrieved from "http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/User_talk:The_Honorable"
Personal tools